CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

When the informal is the formal, the implicit is the explicit: Holistic sustainability education at Green Mountain College

Tác giả

Joyner Armstrong C.M.; Hustvedt G.; LeHew M.L.A.; Anderson B.G.; Hiller Connell K.Y.

Năm xuất bản

2016

Source title

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

8

DOI

10.1108/IJSHE-02-2015-0012

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84992643552&doi=10.1108%2fIJSHE-02-2015-0012&partnerID=40&md5=9d3c7734b67bdfeaa180728cb2cc7caa

Tóm tắt

Purpose: The purpose of this project is to provide an account of the student experience at a higher education institution known for its holistic approach to sustainability education. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative study was conducted at Green Mountain College (GMC), an environmental liberal arts school in Poultney, VT; 55 students participated in focus group interviews. Findings: Students articulate that the most valuable gains that manifest at GMA are a variety of new capacities for science literacy, anthropological appreciation, the triple bottom line, a sense of place, systems, empathic decision-making and reasoning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and practical techniques supporting self-sufficiency. Prompting these emergent outcomes was a philosophy of practice at Green Mountain College, which included place-based techniques, empowerment, personalization, community ecology and charting polarity. Many students described their seeming metamorphosis as uncomfortable, and some felt isolated from the outside paradigm. Research limitations/implications: A key implication of the study’s findings is that in a holistic setting, the line between the informal and formal curriculum are significantly blurred and what is implicitly communicated through university practices and values is what most transforms the students’ explicit understanding of sustainability. Practical implications: Sustainability education is far more than technique, far more than what a lone instructor can manifest in students. While the persistence of individual faculty members is important, this evidence suggests that the fertile conditions for transformation may be more fruitful when faculty members work together with a collective sense of responsibility and a well-articulated paradigm. Originality/value: The advantage of the present study is that it examines the perceived impact of a focus on sustainability across curricula and school by considering the educational environment as a whole. The experiences of students from many different majors who are involved in a holistic, sustainability-infused curriculum at a university with a history of successful post-graduation job placements in the sustainability field are explored here. © 2016, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Từ khóa

Capacities; Holistic sustainability education; Qualitative inquiry; Student experience; Sustainability integration

Tài liệu tham khảo

Brundiers K., Wiek A., Redman C.L., Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11, 4, pp. 308-324, (2010); Burns H., Teaching for transformation: (re)designing sustainability courses, Journal of Sustainability Education, 2, 1, (2011); Burns H., Meaningful sustainability learning: a study of sustainability pedagogy in two university courses, International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 25, 2, pp. 166-175, (2013); Cervantes G., A methodology for teaching industrial ecology, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8, 2, pp. 131-141, (2007); Colucci-Gray L., Camino E., Barbiero G., Gray D., From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: an ecological framework for education, Science Education, 90, 2, pp. 227-252, (2006); De Eyto A., McMahon M., Hadfield M., Hutchings M., Strategies for developing sustainable design practice for students and SME professionals, European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 3, pp. 331-342, (2008); Eagan P., Cook T., Joeres E., Teaching the importance of culture and interdisciplinary education for sustainable development, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3, 1, pp. 48-66, (2002); Eisner E.W., The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice, (1998); Ellis G., Weekes T., Making sustainability ‘real’: using group-enquiry to promote education for sustainable development, Environmental Education Research, 14, 4, pp. 482-500, (2008); Entwistle N., Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: conceptual frameworks and educational contexts, (2000); Learning and Skills for Sustainable Development, (2004); Grauerholz L., Teaching holistically to achieve deep learning, College Teaching, 49, 2, pp. 44-50, (2001); Gulwadi G.B., Using reflective journals in a sustainable design studio, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10, 2, pp. 96-106, (2009); Haigh M., Internationalization, planetary citizenship and Higher Education, Inc, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 38, 4, pp. 427-440, (2008); Hegarty K., Thomas I., Kriewaldt C., Holdsworth S., Bekessy S., Insights into the value of a ‘stand-alone’ course for sustainability education, Environmental Education Research, 17, 4, pp. 451-469, (2011); Howard P., Educating the imagination: teaching for sustainability through a bioregional literacy curriculum, Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6, 2, pp. 327-340, (2012); Jucker R., ’Sustainability? Never heard of it?’ Some basics we shouldn’t ignore when engaging in education for sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3, 1, pp. 8-18, (2002); Kelly R., Fetherston B., Productive contradictions: dissonance, resistance and change in an experiment with cooperative learning, Journal of Peace Education, 5, 2, pp. 97-111, (2008); Lourdel N., Gondran N., Laforest V., Debray B., Brodhag C., Sustainable development cognitive map: a new method of evaluating student understanding, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8, 2, pp. 170-182, (2007); McKeown R., Using rubrics to assess student knowledge related to sustainability: a practitioner’s view, Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5, 1, pp. 61-74, (2011); Green mountain college, (2014); Remington-Doucette S.M., Hiller Connell K.Y.H., Armstrong C.M., Musgrove S.L., Assessing sustainability education in a transdisciplinary undergraduate course focused on real-world problem solving: a case for disciplinary grounding, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14, 4, pp. 404-433, (2013); Rickinson M., Lundholm C., Hopwood N., Environmental Learning: Insights from Research into the Student Experience, (2009); Rode H., Michelsen G., Levels of indicator development for education for sustainable development, Environmental Education Research, 14, 1, pp. 19-33, (2008); Sandri O.J., Threshold concepts, systems and learning for sustainability, Environmental Education Research, 19, 6, pp. 810-822, (2013); Segalas J., Ferrer-Balas D., Mulder K.F., Conceptual maps: measuring learning processes of engineering students concerning sustainable development, European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 3, pp. 297-306, (2008); Shephard K., Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 1, pp. 87-98, (2008); Sipos Y., Battisi B., Grimm K., Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 1, pp. 68-86, (2008); Svanstrom M., Lozano-Garcia F.J., Rowe D., Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 3, pp. 339-351, (2008); Contributing to A More Sustainable Future: Quality Education, Life Skills and Education for Sustainable Development, (2005); Venkataraman B., Education for sustainable development, Environment Magazine, 51, 2, pp. 8-10, (2009); Warburton K., Deep learning and education for sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4, 1, pp. 44-56, (2003); Wiek A., Withycombe L., Redman C.L., Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development, Sustainability Science, 6, 2, pp. 203-218, (2011); Wright T.S.A., Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3, 3, pp. 203-220, (2002); Landorf H., Doscher S., Rocco T., Education for sustainable human development, Theory and Research Education, 6, 2, pp. 221-236, (2008)

Nơi xuất bản

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus