CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Gender differences in bystander response to risk for party rape
Tác giả
Nguyen L.J.; Katz J.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Victims and Victimization: Risk Factors, Intervention Strategies and Socioemotional Outcomes
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This study investigated individual differences in bystander responses to potential party rape scenarios. In these scenarios, an intoxicated woman was escorted by an apparently sober man into a private bedroom. Undergraduate students at a small liberal arts college (N = 209) read this scenario and responded to measures of intent to intervene, barriers to intervention, and rape myth acceptance. As expected, intent to intervene was negatively correlated with barriers to intervention and rape myth acceptance. Also as expected, compared to women, men reported less intent to intervene, perceived more barriers to intervention, and reported greater rape myths acceptance. Multivariate analyses showed that barriers to intervention mediated the association between bystander gender and intent to intervene. Bystander education programs that explicitly address barriers to active intervention, including risk identification, acceptance of responsibility to intervene, skills deficits and audience inhibition, may help engage both men and women as active bystanders in sexual assault prevention. © 2016 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
Từ khóa
Bystander; Gender; Sexual assault
Tài liệu tham khảo
Armstrong E.A., Hamilton L., Sweeney B., Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape, Social Problems, 53, pp. 483-499, (2006); Banyard V.L., Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence, Violence and Victims, 23, pp. 83-97, (2008); Banyard V.L., Moynihan M.M., Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students, Psychology of Violence, 1, pp. 287-301, (2011); Bennett S., Banyard V.M., Garnhart L., To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, pp. 476-496, (2014); Brown A.L., Messman-Moore T.L., Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students' willingness to intervene against sexual aggression, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, pp. 503-517, (2010); Burn S.M., A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention, Sex Roles, 60, pp. 779-792, (2009); Carlson M., I'd rather go along and be considered a man: Masculinity and bystander intervention, The Journal of Men's Studies, 16, pp. 3-17, (2008); Casey E.A., Ohler K., Being a positive bystander: Male antiviolence allies' experiences of "stepping up., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, pp. 62-83, (2012); Chabot H.F., Tracy T.L., Manning C.A., Poisson C.A., Sex, attribution, and severity influence intervention decisions of informal helpers in domestic violence, Interpersonal Violence, 24, pp. 1696-1713, (2009); Fabiano P.M., Perkins H.W., Berkowitz A., Linkenbach J., Stark C., Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach, Journal of American College Health, 52, pp. 105-112, (2003); Hayes A.F., Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, (2013); Hinck S.S., Thomas R.W., Rape myth acceptance in college students: How far have we come?, Sex Roles, 40, pp. 815-832, (1999); Katz J., Deconstructing masculinity in the locker room: The mentors in violence prevention project, Harvard Educational Review, 65, pp. 163-174, (1995); Katz J., Colbert S., Colangelo L., Effects of group status and victim sex on female bystanders' responses to a potential party rape, Violence and Victims, 30, pp. 265-278, (2015); Katz J., Moore J., Bystander education for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis, Violence and Victims, 28, pp. 1054-1067, (2013); Koelsch L.E., Brown A.L., Boisen L., Bystander perceptions: Implications for university sexual assault prevention programs, Violence and Victims, 27, pp. 563-579, (2012); Krebs C.P., Lindquist C.H., Warner T.D., Fisher B.S., Martin S.L., The campus sexual assault (CSA) study (221153), (2007); Latane B., Darley J.M., The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help?, (1970); Levant R., Richmond R., Cook S., House A.T., Aupont M., The Femininity Ideology Scale: Factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and social contextual variation, Sex Roles, 57, pp. 373-383, (2007); Levine M., Crowther S., The responsive bystander: How social group membership and group size encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, pp. 1429-1439, (2008); Masters N.T., My strength is not for hurting: Men's anti-rape websites and their construction of masculinity and male sexuality, Sexualities, 12, pp. 33-46, (2010); McMahon S., Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students, Journal of American College Health, 59, pp. 3-11, (2010); McMahon S., Postmus J., Koenick R.A., Engaging bystanders: A primary prevention approach to sexual violence on campus, Journal of College Student Development, 15, pp. 115-130, (2011); Mohler-Kuo M., Dowdall G.W., Koss M.P., Wechsler H., Correlates of rape while intoxicated in a national sample of college women, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, pp. 37-45, (2004); Muir G., Lonsway K.A., Payne D.L., Rape myth acceptance among Scottish and American students, The Journal of Social Psychology, 136, pp. 261-262, (1996); Payne D.L., Lonsway K.A., Fitzgerald L.F., Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale, Journal of Research in Personality, 33, pp. 27-68, (1999); Stein J.L., Peer educators and close friends as predictors of male college students' willingness to prevent rape, Journal of College Student Development, 48, pp. 75-89, (2007); Tice D.M., Baumeister R.F., Masculinity inhibits helping in emergencies: Personality does predict the bystander effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, pp. 420-428, (1985); Survey of current and recent college students on sexual assault, (2015)
Nơi xuất bản
Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus