CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Mapping institutional legitimacy in meeting of expanding demand for education
Tác giả
Storrs E.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Research in Social Problems and Public Policy
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.1108/S0196-115220160000022007
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
One of the consequences of the democratization of higher education in the United States is the explosion of institutions that have arisen to meet mass demand, and the stratification of those institutions based on the populations they serve. The Ivy League, the "public ivy" flagship state universities, and a cadre of elite small private liberal arts colleges are the basis for the institutionalized myths that inform public perception of what colleges or universities are, even though these schools account for an ever-shrinking fraction of American higher education experiences. The growth in schools serving primarily "nontraditional" students-that is, anything except in-person residential undergraduate liberal arts for at-least-middle-class white eighteen-year-olds with certain test scores coming directly from a college-preparatory high school program-has created a legitimacy paradox within the higher education sector. Democratization has created a need for different types of institutions. Copyright © 2017 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Accreditation Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, (2012); Aldersley S.F., Upward Drift is alive and well, Change, 27, 5, pp. 50-57, (1995); Ashforth B.E., Gibbs B.W., The double-edge of organizational legitimation, Organization Science, 1, 2, pp. 177-194, (1990); Aurini J., Crafting legitimation projects: An institutional analysis of private education businesses, Sociological Forum, 21, 1, pp. 83-111, (2006); Birnbaum R., Maintaining Diversity in Higher Education (1st.ed.), (1983); Brint S., Riddle M., Hanneman R.A., Reference sets, identities, and aspirations in a complex organizational field: The case of American four-year colleges and universities, Sociology of Education, 79, 3, pp. 229-252, (2006); The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, (2006); The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, (2011); Carr-Saunders A.M., Wilson P.A., The Professions, (1933); Cattani G., Ferriani S., Negro G., Perretti F., The structure of consensus: Network ties, legitimation, and exit rates of U.S feature film producer organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 1, pp. 145-182, (2008); Chow E.P.Y., Acupuncture: Its History and Educational Significant to Health Practice in the United States, (1975); Clark B., The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds, (1987); Clarke A., Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn, (2005); Daunno T., Sutton R.I., Price R.H., Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environment: A study of drug abuse treatment units, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 3, pp. 636-661, (1991); Deephouse D.L., Suchman M.C., Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 49-77, (2008); Dey E.L., Milem J.F., Berger J.B., Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism?, Sociology of Education, 70, 4, pp. 308-323, (1997); Epstein E., Votaw D., Rationality, Legitimacy, Responsibility: Search for New Directions in Business and Society, (1978); Goldin C., Katz L.F., The Shaping of Higher Education: The Formative Years in the United States, 1890 to 1940. NBER, (1998); Goode W., Professions and non-professions, Professionalization, pp. 33-45, (1966); Greenleaf W.J., Higher education in 1934, The Journal of Higher Education, 5, 2, pp. 61-65, (1934); Hannan M.T., Freeman J., Organizational Ecology, (1993); Hybels R., On legitimacy, legitimation, and organization: A critical review and integrative theoretical model, Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995, 1, pp. 241-245, (1995); Jencks C., Riesman D., The Academic Revolution, (2002); Kraatz M.S., Zajac E.J., Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change, American Sociological Review, 61, 5, pp. 812-836, (1996); Lachs J., Graduate programs in the undergraduate college: The arguments against turning a college into a university, The Journal of Higher Education, 36, 3, (1965); Leicht K., Fennell M.L., Professional Work: A Sociological Approach, (2001); Longanecker D.A., Mission Differentiation vs. Mission Creep: Higher Educations Battle between Creation and Evolution, Presented at the National Conference of State Legislators, Boulder, CO, (2008); Martin J., Samels J., Shaky ground in troubled times: Its a perplexing paradigm-That of fragile American colleges and universities, University Business, 9, 10, pp. 25-26, (2006); McConnell T.R., A General Pattern for American Public Higher Education, (1962); McGlothlin W., Book review: Professional education: Some new directions, The Journal of Higher Education, 44, 4, pp. 322-324, (1973); Merriam S.B., Qualitative Research and Case Study Research in Education (2nd Ed), (1998); Meyer J.W., Rowan B., Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83, 2, pp. 340-363, (1977); Moore W.E., The Professions: Roles and Rules, (1970); Morphew C.C., Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of U.S. Colleges and universities, Journal of Higher Education, 80, 3, pp. 243-269, (2009); Omeara K., Striving for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 121-179, (2007); Riesman D., Constraint and Variety in American Education, (1965); Ruef M., Scott W.R., A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 4, pp. 877-904, (1998); Scott W.R., Organizations: Rational Natural, and Open Systems (2nd Ed.), (1987); Scott W.R., Institutions and Organizations, (1995); Singh J.V., Tucker D.J., House R.J., Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 2, pp. 171-193, (1986); Suchman M.C., Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20, 3, pp. 571-610, (1995); Toma J.D., Institutional strategy: Positioning for prestige, The Organization of Higher Education: Managing Colleges for A New Era, pp. 118-159, (2012); Tornikoski E.T., Newbert S.L., Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective, Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 2, pp. 311-335, (2007); Trow M., The democratization of higher education in America, Archives Européennes de Sociologie/European Journal of Sociology/Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie, 3, pp. 231-262, (1962); Tyler R.W., Distinctive attributes of education for the professions, Social Work Journal, 23, pp. 52-62, (1952); Weick K.E., Administering education in loosely coupled schools, The Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 10, pp. 673-676, (1982); Zimmerman M.A., Zeitz G.J., Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy, The Academy of Management Review, 27, 3, pp. 414-431, (2002)
Nơi xuất bản
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Hình thức xuất bản
Review
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus