CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The positive power of negative capability: Long-term teacher researchers in the United States
Tác giả
Currin E.
Năm xuất bản
2022
Source title
Moral and Political Values in Teacher Education over Time: International Perspectives
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.4324/9781003219507-7
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
For decades, neo-liberal education policies in the United States have promoted accountability and standardisation as the remedy for the so-called failing public schools. Such market-driven efforts, especially the proliferation of high-stakes testing, have narrowed curricula and contributed to teacher burnout and demoralisation. Teacher research, educators’ systematic study of their practice for the sake of improvement, is a more bottom-up approach to transformation, aligned with the democratic vision for public education. However, as a critical counterweight to top-down neo-liberal education reform throughout the United States, teacher research is not guaranteed. Rather, its endurance depends, in part, on who teacher researchers are and how they come to be. To explore these themes, this chapter presents insights from a study of three long-term teacher researchers, each nominated by teacher educators who recognised the stance of inquiry they have devoted to continual, self-guided change. Scholarship is rife with theoretical discussion of the inquiry stance construct as a lifelong quality, as well as guidance for introducing teacher research to pre-service and in-service teachers. Taking the long view, this study sought empirical evidence of inquiry’s endurance in the face of increasing neo-liberalism, specifically by identifying the dispositions that enable educators to develop and maintain an inquiry stance. © 2023 selection and editorial matter, Nick Mead; individual chapters, the contributors. All rights reserved.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams G., Using a narrative approach to illuminate teacher professional learning in an era of accountability, Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, pp. 161-170, (2017); Ayers W., Joseph P.B., Burnaford G.E., A teacher ain’t nothin’ but a hero: Teachers and teaching in film, Images of Schoolteachers in America, (2000); Baker S., Milner J.O., Building discretionary authority in a teacher education program, Action in Teacher Education, 38, 2, pp. 91-103, (2016); Ball S.J., Olmedo A., Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities, Critical Studies in Education, 54, 1, pp. 85-96, (2013); Bate W.J., Negative Capability: The Intuitive Approach in Keats, (1939); Becton Y.J., Bogiages C., Currin E., D'Amico L., Jeffries R., Lilly T., Tamim S., An emerging framework for the EdD activist, Impacting Education, 5, 2, pp. 43-54, (2020); Bien A., Selland M., Living the stories we tell: The sociopolitical context of enacting teaching stories, Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, pp. 85-94, (2018); Bray J.S., Kramer P.A., Lepage D., Stefly B.E., Wolfe M.P., Pasch S.H., Enz B.J., The expert teacher, Life Cycle of the Career Teacher, (2000); Buchanan R., Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21, 6, pp. 700-719, (2015); Burt J., Negative capability and education, Literary Imagination, 16, 3, pp. 261-274, (2014); Carr D., Skinner D., The cultural roots of professional wisdom: Towards a broader view of teacher expertise, Educational Philosophy & Theory, 41, 2, pp. 141-154, (2009); Charest B., Navigating the shores: Troubling notions of the teacher as researcher, International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 10, 2, pp. 19-43, (2019); Chia R., Morgan S., Educating the philosopher-manager: De-signing the times, Management Learning, 27, 1, pp. 37-64, (1996); Clayton C., Kilbane J., McCarthy M.R., Growing into inquiry: Stories of high school teachers using inquiry for themselves and their students, Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 8, 2, pp. 1-20, (2017); Cochran-Smith M., Lytle S.L., Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation, (2009); Crotty M., The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process, London: Sage, (1998); Currin E., Storied stance: an oral history of long-term teacher researchers in the age of accountability, Doctoral Dissertation, (2018); Dana N.F., Yendol-Hoppey D., The Reflective educator’s Guide to Classroom Research: Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn through Practitioner Inquiry, (2014); Dewey J., How We Think, (1910); Domina T., Penner A., Penner E., Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting machines, Annual Review of Sociology, 43, pp. 311-330, (2017); Flessner R., Klehr M., Lessons from the teaching of teacher research, Educational Forum, 80, 4, pp. 479-480, (2016); Gundy J., Poetry, the sleeping king, and creative doubt, Cross Currents, 64, 4, pp. 466-488, (2014); Gutek G.L., American Education 1945-2000: A History and Commentary, (2000); Joyce P.A., The thing itself”: Using literary criticism techniques in teaching qualitative research through dissertation advising, Qualitative Social Work, 15, 3, pp. 407-413, (2016); Kim J., Teacher action research as Bildung: An application of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics to teacher professional development, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 3, pp. 379-393, (2013); Kumashiro K.K., Bad Teacher: How Blaming Teachers Distorts the Bigger Picture, (2012); Ladson-Billings G., Gorski P., Zenkov K., The pedagogy of poverty: The big lies about poor children, The Big Lies of School Reform: Finding Better Solutions for the Future of Public Education, (2014); Macdonald M., Weller K., Redefining our roles as teachers, learners, and leaders through continuous cycles of practitioner inquiry, The New Educator, 13, 2, pp. 137-147, (2017); Magee B., How can we ever know what we know?, Think, 14, pp. 33-57, (2015); McDonald D., Craig C., Markello C., Kahn M., Our academic sandbox: Scholarly identities shaped through play, tantrums, building castles, and rebuffing backyard bullies, The Qualitative Report, 21, 6, pp. 1145-1163, (2016); Mead N., Values and Professional Knowledge in Teacher Education, (2019); Olsen B., How reasons for entry into the profession illuminate teacher identity development, Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 3, pp. 23-40, (2008); Pamphilon B., The zoom model: A dynamic framework for the analysis of life histories, Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 3, pp. 393-410, (1999); Patton M.Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, (2002); Phillion J., He M.F., Connelly F.M., Narrative and experience in multicultural education, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, (2005); Pine G.J., Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies, Los Angeles: Sage, (2009); Poulet G., The self and the other in critical consciousness (M.S. Sibley, trans.), Diacritics, 2, 1, pp. 46-50, (1972); Ralston S.J., Higher education’s microcredentialing craze: A postdigital -Deweyan critique, Postdigital Science and Education, 3, pp. 83-101, (2020); Rogers C., I’m not so sure.”: Teacher educator action research into uncertainty, Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 18, 2, pp. 1-16, (2016); Rury J.L., Education and Social Change: Contours in the History of American Schooling, (2016); Saggurthi S., Thakur M., Usefulness of uselessness: A case for negative capability in management, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15, 1, pp. 180-193, (2016); Santoro D.A., Cain L., Principled Resistance: How Teachers Resolve Ethical Dilemmas, (2018); Seidman I., Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, (2006); Sfard A., Prusak A., Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity, Educational Researcher, 34, 4, pp. 14-22, (2005); Simpson P., French R., Negative capability and the capacity to think in the present moment: Some implications for leadership practice, Leadership, 2, 2, pp. 245-255, (2006); Simpson P., French R., Harvey C.E., Leadership and negative capability, Human Relations, 55, 10, pp. 1209-1226, (2002); Sugimoto A.T., Carter K., Bosworth K., Divergent narratives: The story of schools, schooling, and students from the 1960s to the present, Prevention Science in School Settings: Complex Relationships and Processes, (2016); Taylor L.A., How teachers become teacher researchers: Narrative as a tool for teacher identity construction, Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, pp. 16-25, (2017); Townsend A., Myopic Keats, the Kenyon Review, 33, 4, pp. 167-172, (2011); Tsur R., Two critical attitudes: Quest for certitude and negative capability, College English, 36, 7, pp. 776-788, (1975); van der Heijden H.R.M.A., Geldens J.J.M., Beijaard D., Popeijus H.L., Characteristics of teachers as change agents, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21, 6, pp. 681-699, (2015); van Es E.A., Stockero S.L., Sherin M.G., van Zoest L.R., Dyer E., Making the most of teacher self-captured video, Mathematics Teacher Educator, 4, 1, pp. 6-19, (2015); Wamba N., Developing an alternative epistemology of practice: teachers’ action research as critical pedagogy, Action Research, 9, 2, pp. 162-178, (2011); Wear D., Toward negative capability: Literature in the medical curriculum, Curriculum Inquiry, 34, 2, pp. 169-184, (2004); Wheatley M., Turning to One Another: Simple Conversations to Restore Hope to the Future, (2009); Wigod J.D., Negative capability and wise passiveness, PMLA, 67, 4, pp. 383-390, (1952); Yeigh M.J., Inquiry at the heart of teacher preparation, I.E.: Inquiry in Education, 9, 2, pp. 1-4, (2017); Yow V.R., Recording Oral History: A Guide for the Humanities and Social Sciences, (2005)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus