CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

“I’m not scientifically gifted, I’m a girl”: implicit measures of gender-science stereotypes – preliminary evidence

Tác giả

Mascret N.; Cury F.

Năm xuất bản

2015

Source title

Educational Studies

Số trích dẫn

10

DOI

10.1080/03055698.2015.1043979

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84940439372&doi=10.1080%2f03055698.2015.1043979&partnerID=40&md5=f65f18265f37b91036793cab351a7926

Tóm tắt

Students often have a negative view on science, particularly women. Furthermore, academic level in math and science is usually considered as an innate ability. The aims of the study were to create an Implicit Association Test (IAT) in order to highlight the stereotype that science is innate, to identify if the gender of the participants impacts the results of this implicit measure and to compare self-report and implicit measures. Results showed that (1) science and innate are more easily associated in the IAT than liberal arts and innate, (2) women have a higher association of science and innate than men in the IAT (that is not the case in self-report measures). © 2015 Taylor & Francis.

Từ khóa

gender; Implicit Association Test; implicit theories; science; stereotype

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cury F., Elliot A.J., Da Fonseca D., Moller A.C., The Social-cognitive Model of Achievement Motivation and the 2 × 2 Achievement Goal Framework, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, pp. 666-679, (2006); Cvencek D., Meltzoff A., Greenwald A.N., Greenwald A.G., Math–gender Stereotypes in Elementary School Children, Child Development, 82, 3, pp. 766-779, (2011); Dweck C.S., Molden D.C., Self-theories: Their Impact on Competence Motivation and Acquisition, The Handbook of Competence and Motivation, pp. 122-140, (2005); Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, pp. 197-216, (2003); Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., Greenwald A.G., Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math ? Me, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1, pp. 44-59, (2002); Rattan A., Good C., Dweck C.S., It’s Ok – Not Everyone Can Be Good at Math: Instructors with an Entity Theory Comfort (and Demotivate) Students, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, pp. 731-737, (2012)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

All Open Access; Green Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus