CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Facepalms and cringes: liberal education misapprehended

Tác giả

Riley D.

Năm xuất bản

2015

Source title

Engineering Studies

Số trích dẫn

4

DOI

10.1080/19378629.2015.1062499

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84949539189&doi=10.1080%2f19378629.2015.1062499&partnerID=40&md5=8fa8fa840c6b305a04e0f92c4e516478

Tóm tắt

Many well-intentioned engineering faculty, eager to integrate engineering and liberal arts, do not seem to truly grasp the meaning and intent of liberal education. Most of us are doing it wrong, and our colleagues across campus would cringe or facepalm at our efforts. Such moments reveal our (conscious or unconscious) misapprehensions of liberal education. Reflexive engagement of these misapprehensions may be a productive site for our own liberal education. © 2015 Taylor & Francis.

Từ khóa

critical participation; engineering education; liberal education

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cech E.A., Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?, Science, Technology & Human Values, 39, 1, pp. 34-63, (2014); Claris L., Riley D., Situation Critical: Critical Theory and Critical Thinking in Engineering Education, Engineering Studies, 4, 2, pp. 101-120, (2012); Freire P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed, (1970); Harris C.E., Pritchard M.S., Rabins M.J., Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, (2013); King P.M., Kitchener K.S., Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults, (1994); Lapine M.C., The Sneaky Chef: Simple Strategies for Hiding Healthy Foods in Kids’ Favorite Meals, (2007); Snider A.

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus