CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Interdisciplinary collaboration to promote l2 science literacy in hong kong
Tác giả
Fan C.; Lo Y.Y.
Năm xuất bản
2015
Source title
Team Teaching and Team Learning in the Language Classroom: Collaboration for innovation in ELT
Số trích dẫn
3
DOI
10.4324/9781315718507-9
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This chapter discusses the self-reflective inquiry that seeks to broaden understanding of team learning in higher education by emphasising the importance of practice and collaboration for meaning making and community building. Central to the chapter conceptualisation of team learning are groupings of shared activity called communities of practice. Faculty members belong to a number of communities of practice (CoP) is characterised as learning networks or teams. Ideally, one can share their passions for learning, teaching, community service and scholarship by interacting with likeminded individuals as endeavour to do them better. The liberal arts curriculum was taught in English to second language learners and required an unusual degree of interdisciplinary collaboration between English language teaching (ELT) educators and subject-area specialists. The chapter reflects the definition of team learning and elaborates it beyond the ELT classroom by emphasising learning opportunities within the array of CoP typically found in higher education communities. © 2016 selection and editorial material, Akira Tajino, Tim Stewart and David Dalsky.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Achinstein B., Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration, Teachers College Record, 104, 3, pp. 421-455, (2002); Arkoudis S., Teaching English as a second language in science classes: Incommensurate epistemologies?, Language and Education, 17, 3, pp. 161-187, (2003); Cammarata L., Tedick D.J., Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers, Modern Language Journal, 96, 2, pp. 251-269, (2012); Carless D., Walker E., Effective team teaching between local and native-speaking English teachers, Language and Education, 20, 6, pp. 463-477, (2006); Coyle D., Hood P., Marsh D., CLIL: Content and language integrated learning, (2010); Creese A., Teacher collaboration and talk in multilingual classrooms, (2005); Creese A., Content-focused classrooms and learning English: How teachers collaborate, Theory into Practice, 49, 2, pp. 99-105, (2010); Crow G.M., Pounder D.G., Interdisciplinary teacher teams: Context, design, and process, Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 2, pp. 216-254, (2000); Dalton-Puffer C., Discourse in content-and-language-integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms, (2007); Davison C., Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 4, pp. 454-475, (2006); DelliCarpini M., Dialogues across disciplines: Preparing English-as-a-secondlanguage teachers for interdisciplinary collaboration, Current Issues in Education, 11, 2, (2009); Dove M., Honigsfeld A., ESL coteaching and collaboration: Opportunities to develop teacher leadership and enhance student learning, TESOL Journal, 1, 1, pp. 3-22, (2010); Circular Memorandum No. 139/2010, (2010); Gibbons P., English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone, (2009); Hargreaves A., Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the post-modern age, (1994); Hoare P., Kong S., Evans M., Co-ordinating language across the curriculum: A handbook for English-medium schools, (1997); Kong S., Collaboration between content and language specialists in late immersion, Canadian Modern Language Review, 70, 1, pp. 103-122, (2014); Koopman G.J., Skeet J., de Graaff R., Exploring content teachers’ knowledge of language pedagogy: A report on a small-scale research project in a Dutch CLIL context, Language Learning Journal, 42, 2, pp. 123-136, (2014); Lin A.M.Y., Language across the curriculum: Theory and practice; Little J.W., The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations, Teachers College Record, 91, 4, pp. 509-536, (1990); Llinares A., Morton T., Whittaker R., The roles of language in CLIL, (2012); Lo Y.Y., Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes, RELC Journal, 45, 2, pp. 181-196, (2014); Lo Y.Y., A glimpse into the effectiveness of L2-content cross-curricular collaboration in content-based instruction programmes, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18, 4, pp. 443-462, (2014); Lo Y.Y., Lo E.S.C., A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong, Review of Educational Research, 84, 1, pp. 47-73, (2014); Lortie D., School-teacher, (1975); Lyster R., Ballinger S., Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts, Language Teaching Research, 15, 3, pp. 279-288, (2011); Man E.Y.F., Teachers’ perspectives towards language across the curriculum initiatives for English-medium schools in Hong Kong, Curriculum and instruction: The journey of research and practice, pp. 383-390, (2008); Mehisto P., CLIL counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL, International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 1, pp. 93-119, (2008); Musanti S.I., Pence L., Collaboration and teacher development: Unpacking resistance, constructing knowledge, and navigating identities, Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 1, pp. 73-89, (2010); Pounder D.G., Teacher teams: Redesigning teachers’ work for collaboration, Restructuring schools for collaboration, pp. 65-88, (1998); Rose D., Martin J.R., Learning to write/reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school, (2012); Schleppegrell M., The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective, (2004); Snow C.M., Met M., Genesee F., A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction, TESOL Quarterly, 23, 2, pp. 201-219, (1989); Stewart T., Sagliano M., Sagliano J., An alternative team teaching model for content-based instruction, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 3, 1, pp. 211-243, (2000); Stoller F.L., Content-based instruction, Encyclopedia of Language and Education, pp. 59-70, (2008); Tajino A., Tajino Y., Native and non-native: What can they offer?, ELT Journal, 54, 1, pp. 3-11, (2000); Tan M., Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning, Language Teaching Research, 15, 3, pp. 325-342, (2011); Trent J., Teacher identity construction across the curriculum: Promoting cross-curriculum collaboration in English-medium schools, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30, 2, pp. 167-183, (2010); Tsui A.B.M., Medium of instruction in Hong Kong: One country, two systems, whose language?, Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda?, pp. 97-106, (2004)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus