CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Using implicit measures to highlight science teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence
Tác giả
Mascret N.; Roussel P.; Cury F.
Năm xuất bản
2015
Source title
European Journal of Psychology of Education
Số trích dẫn
12
DOI
10.1007/s10212-015-0249-6
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Using an innovative method, a Single-Target Implicit Association Test (ST-IAT) was created to explore the implicit theories of intelligence among science and liberal arts teachers and their relationships with their gender. The results showed that for science teachers—especially for male teachers—there was a negative implicit association between “intelligence” and “modifiable” stimuli, whereas liberal arts teachers had no implicit association between these two variables. The results are discussed in comparison with previous explicit measures, and the implications for teacher training are highlighted. © 2015, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Từ khóa
Gender; Implicit theories of intelligence; Mathematics; Science; Single-target implicit association test; Teachers
Tài liệu tham khảo
Banaji M., Greenwald A.G., Implicit stereotyping and prejudice, The Psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium, pp. 55-76, (1994); Banaji M.R., Hardin C.D., Automatic stereotyping, Psychological Science, 7, 3, pp. 136-141, (1996); Banaji M.R., Lemm K.M., Carpenter S.J., The social unconscious, Blackwell handbook of social psychology, pp. 134-158, (2001); Beach D., Mathematics goes to market, Democratic education—ethnographic challenges, (2003); Beach D., Dovemark M., Education and the commodity problem: ethnographic investigations of creativity and performativity in Swedish schools, (2007); Bem S.L., The measurement of psychological androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 2, pp. 155-162, (1974); Bluemke M., Friese M., Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects?, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, pp. 163-176, (2006); Bluemke M., Friese M., Reliability and validity of the Single?Target IAT (ST?IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects, European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 6, pp. 977-997, (2008); Braten I., Stromso H.I., Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 4, pp. 371-388, (2004); Butler R., Making judgments about ability: the role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, pp. 965-978, (2000); Calderhead J., Teachers: beliefs and knowledge, Handbook of educational psychology, pp. 709-725, (1996); Carr P.B., Dweck C.S., Intelligence and motivation, The Cambridge handbook of intelligence, pp. 748-770, (2011); Crosby F., Bromley S., Saxe L., Recent unobtrusive studies of black and white discrimination and prejudice: a literature review, Psychological Bulletin, 87, pp. 546-563, (1980); Crowne D.P., Marlowe D., A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, pp. 349-354, (1960); Cunningham W.A., Preacher K.J., Banaji M.R., Implicit attitude measures: consistency, stability, and convergent validity, Psychological Science, 12, 2, pp. 163-170, (2001); Cury F., Elliot A.J., Da Fonseca D., Moller A.C., The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, pp. 666-679, (2006); Cvencek D., Andrew N., Meltzoff A.N., Greenwald A.G., Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children, Child Development, 82, 3, pp. 766-779, (2011); Deemer S.A., Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments, Educational Research, 46, pp. 73-90, (2004); Dislich F.X.R., Imhoff R., Banse R., Altstotter-Gleich C., Zinkernagel A., Schmitt M., Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-concepts of intelligence predict performance on tests of intelligence, European Journal of Personality, 26, pp. 212-220, (2012); Dweck C.S., Motivational processes affecting learning, American Psychologist, 41, pp. 1040-1048, (1986); Dweck C.S., Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development, (1999); Dweck C.S., Leggett E., A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality, Psychological Review, 95, pp. 256-273, (1988); Dweck C.S., Molden D.C., Self-theories: their impact on competence motivation and acquisition, The Handbook of competence and motivation, pp. 122-140, (2005); Dweck C.S., Sorich L., Mastery-oriented thinking, Coping, pp. 232-251, (1999); Else-Quest N.M., Hyde J.S., Linn M.C., Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 136, pp. 103-127, (2010); Frome P.M., Eccles J.S., Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, pp. 435-452, (1998); Fujii T., Uebuchi H., Assessment of participants' theories of intelligence: reliability and validity of the implicit association test, Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 3, pp. 263-274, (2010); Gonida E., Kosseoglou G., Leondari A., Implicit theories of intelligence, perceived academic competence, and school achievement: testing alternative models, American Journal of Psychology, 119, 2, pp. 223-238, (2006); Good C., Aronson J., Inzlicht M., Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: an intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, pp. 645-662, (2003); Good C., Rattan A., Dweck C.S., Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4, pp. 700-717, (2012); Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R., Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, Psychological Review, 102, pp. 4-27, (1995); Greenwald A.G., Farnham S.D., Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, pp. 1022-1038, (2000); Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R., Rudman L.A., Farnham S.D., Nosek B.A., Mellott D.S., A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept, Psychological Review, 109, pp. 3-25, (2002); Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., Schwartz J.L.K., Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, pp. 1464-1480, (1998); Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, pp. 197-216, (2003); Greenwald A.G., Poehlman T.A., Uhlmann E.L., Banaji M.R., Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1, pp. 17-41, (2009); Hofmann W., Gawronski B., Gschwendner T., Le H., Schmitt M., A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 10, pp. 1369-1385, (2005); Jonsson A.C., Beach D., Reproduction of social class in teacher education: the influence of scientific theories on future teachers' implicit beliefs, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8, 2, (2010); Jonsson A.C., Beach D., Korp H., Erlandson P., Teacher’s implicit theories of intelligence: influences from different disciplines and scientific theories, European Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 4, pp. 387-400, (2012); Karpinski A., Steinman R.B., The single category implicit association test (SC-IAT) as a measure of implicit social cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, pp. 16-32, (2006); Kiefer A.K., Sekaquaptewa D., Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes: a prospective study of female college students, Psychological Science, 18, pp. 13-18, (2007); Lepore L., Brown R., Category and stereotype activation: is prejudice inevitable?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 2, (1997); Leroy N., Bressoux P., Sarrazin P., Trouilloud D., Impact of teachers’ implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 4, pp. 529-545, (2007); Li Q., Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: a review, Educational Research, 41, pp. 63-76, (1999); Lindberg S.M., Hyde J.S., Petersen J.L., Linn M.C., New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 136, pp. 1123-1135, (2010); Liu M., Hu W., Jiannong S., Adey P., Gender stereotyping and affective attitudes towards science in Chinese secondary school students, International Journal of Science Education, 32, 3, pp. 379-395, (2010); Midgley C., Feldlaufer H., Eccles J., The transition to junior high school: beliefs of pre-and post-transition teachers, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, pp. 543-562, (1988); Muis K.R., Personal epistemology and mathematics: a critical review and synthesis of research, Review of Educational Research, 74, 3, pp. 317-377, (2004); Murrone J., Gynther M., Teachers’ implicit “theories” of children’s intelligence, Psychological Reports, 69, pp. 1195-1201, (1991); Myers M.D., Nichols J.D., White J., Teacher and student incremental and entity views of intelligence. The effects of self-regulation and persistence activities, International Journal of Educational Reform, 12, 2, pp. 97-117, (2003); Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., The go/no-go association task, Social Cognition, 19, pp. 625-664, (2001); Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., Greenwald A.G., Math = male, me = female, therefore math ? me, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1, pp. 44-59, (2002); Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., Greenwald A.G., Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 1, pp. 101-115, (2002); Nosek B.A., Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R., Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 2, pp. 166-180, (2005); Nosek B.A., Smyth F.L., Sriram N., Lindner N.M., Devos T., Ayala A., Et al., National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, pp. 10593-10597, (2009); Osborne J., Simon S., Collins S., Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25, 9, pp. 1049-1079, (2003); Pajares M.F., Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct, Review of Educational Research, 62, 3, pp. 307-332, (1992); Park L.E., Cook K.E., Greenwald A.G., Implicit indicators of women’s persistence in math, science, and engineering, Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 6, pp. 145-152, (2001); Plaks J.E., Stroessner S.J., Dweck C.S., Sherman J.W., Person theories and attention allocation: preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, pp. 876-893, (2001); Plaut V.C., Markus H.R., The “inside” story: a cultural-historical analysis of being smart and motivated, American style, Handbook of competence and motivation, pp. 457-488, (2005); Rattan A., Good C., Dweck C.S., It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, pp. 731-737, (2012); Rosenthal R., Jacobson L., Pygmalion in the classroom, (1992); Schoenfeld A.H., Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, pp. 338-355, (1989); Shim S.S., Cho Y.J., Cassady J., Goal structure: the role of teacher’s achievement goals and theories of intelligence, The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 1, pp. 84-104, (2013); Stipek D.J., Givvin K.B., Salmon J.M., MacGyvers V.L., Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 2, pp. 213-226, (2001); Stipek D., Gralinski H., Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics, Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 361-371, (1991); Trouilloud D., Sarrazin P., Bois J., Teacher expectation effects on student perceived competence in physical education classes: autonomy-supportive climate as a moderator, Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1, pp. 75-86, (2006); Wigboldus D.H.J., Holland R.W., & van Knippenberg, A, (2004)
Nơi xuất bản
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus