CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Navigating Disruptive Innovation in Undergraduate Business Education

Tác giả

Behara R.S.; Davis M.M.

Năm xuất bản

2015

Source title

Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

Số trích dẫn

8

DOI

10.1111/dsji.12072

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84936133925&doi=10.1111%2fdsji.12072&partnerID=40&md5=c53f800c07979b95e3ff49719d624896

Tóm tắt

The undergraduate business education landscape is dramatically changing and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Many of the changes are being driven by increasing costs, advances in technology, rapid globalization, and an increasingly diverse workforce and customer base, and are occurring simultaneously in both the business world and higher education. This is especially true for undergraduate business education in which alternative models to the traditional four-year curriculum continue to emerge. Using Christensen's theory of disruptive innovation as a framework, we develop a set of recommendations to help undergraduate business education navigate the disruptions it faces by adopting a "pragmatic liberal" approach. This approach offers a direct contrast to the decades of limited success that business schools have had integrating liberal education and business education. © 2015 Decision Sciences Institute.

Từ khóa

Academic areas; And pedagogical approaches; Content areas; Operations management; Pedagogical approaches; Projects; Service learning; Undergraduate education

Tài liệu tham khảo

Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college, (2003); Allen J., Reichheld F., Hamilton B., Markey R., Closing the delivery gap. Boston, MA: Bain & Company., (2005); Unlockinh Opportunity: Revolutionizing the way the way students approach, finance, and repay higher education, (2014); Astin A.W., Vogelgesang L.J., Ikeda E.K., Yee J.A., How service learning affects students, (2000); Carey K., The University of Everywhere, Departures, pp. 108-109, (2015); Coolidge C., Address to the American Society of Newspaper Editors, (1925); Chew B.E., McInnis-Bowers C., Blending liberal arts & business education, Liberal Education, 90, 1, pp. 56-63, (2004); Christensen C.M., The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail, (1997); Christensen C.M., Aaron S., Clark W., (2001); Christensen C.M., Raynor M.E., The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth, (2003); Christensen C.M., Johnson C.W., Horn M.B., Disrupting class, expanded edition: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns, (2008); Christensen C.M., Eyring H.J., The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out, (2011); Colby A., Ehrlich T., Sullivan W.M., Dolle J.R., Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education: Liberal Learning for the Profession, (2011); Detrick G., An interview with Russel L. Ackoff, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 1, pp. 56-63, (2002); Foroohar R., The school that will get you a job, Time, pp. 22-29, (2014); Goodman J., Strategic customer service, (2009); Digest of Education Statistics 2012 (NCES 2014-015), National Center for Education Statistics, (2013); Gordon R.A., Howell J.E., Higher education for business, The Journal of Business Education, 35, 3, pp. 115-117, (1959); Hunter A.-B., Laursen S.L., Seymour E., Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students'cognitive, personal, and professional development, Science Education, 91, pp. 36-74, (2007); Korn M., Wealth or waste? Rethinking the value of a business major, Wall Street Journal, (2012); Kuh G.D., High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter, Association of American Colleges and Universities, (2008); Lage M.J., Platt G., Treglia M., Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment, Journal of Economic Education, 31, 1, pp. 30-43, (2000); Levesque-Bristol C., Knapp T.D., Fisher B.J., The effectiveness of service-learning: It's not always what you think, Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 3, pp. 208-224, (2010); Lopatto D., Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings, Cell Biology Education, 3, pp. 270-277, (2004); Manyika J., Chui M., Brown B., Bughin J., Dobbs R., Roxburgh C., Byers A.H., (2011); Manyika J., Chui M., Brown B., Bughin J., Dobbs R., Roxburgh C., Byers A.H., (2011); Digest of Education Statistics 2013, Bachelor's, master's, and doctor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions by field of study: Selected years, 1970-71 through 2011-12, (2014); Nguyen S., Computing in the Classroom: From the 'Teaching Machine' to the Promise of Twenty-First Century Learning Technology, Harvard Magazine, (2015); Russell S.H., Hancock M.P., McCullough J., Benefits of undergraduate research experiences, Science, 316, pp. 548-549, (2007); Seymour E., Hunter A.-B., Laursen S.L., Diatonic T., Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study, Science Education, 88, pp. 493-534, (2004); The future of universities: The digital degree, The Economist, (2014); Wagner C., Garner M., Kawulich B., The state of the art of teaching research methods in the social sciences: towards a pedagogical culture, Studies in Higher Education, 36, 1, pp. 75-88, (2011)

Nơi xuất bản

Wiley-Blackwell

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus