CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Same-Sex Relations in Education
Tác giả
Podschwadek F.
Năm xuất bản
2022
Source title
Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-84021-1_7
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This chapter looks at the topic of same-sex relations in political liberal education. After engaging with questions of religious freedom withing the limits of political liberalism, it appears that even if reasonable religious views would support educational institutions that are regulated by the state, religious objections against certain contents of school curricula are still possible. Especially same-sex relations appear to be a point of concern for some religious views and have been targeted by various proponents of natural law theory, John Finnis being one of the most prominent among them. After assessing a variety of arguments against what is often called the promotion of same-sex relations in sex education, this chapter argues that political liberal education ought to include this topic in sex education curricula on grounds of equality and citizens’ self-respect, drawing on the works of feminist authors like Elizabeth Brake and Clare Chambers to support its argument. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Từ khóa
Homosexuality; Marriage; Natural law; Sex education; Transgender rights
Tài liệu tham khảo
Blum R.W., Beuhring T., Shew M.L., Bearinger L.H., Sieving R.E., Resnick M.D., The Effects of Race/Ethnicity, Income, and Family Structure on Adolescent Risk Behaviors, American Journal of Public Health, 90, 12, pp. 1879-1884, (2000); Brake E., Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, And the Law, (2012); Brown S.L., Family Structure and Child Well-Being: The Significance of Parental Cohabitation, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 2, pp. 351-367, (2004); Brown S.L., Manning W.D., Stykes J.B., Family Structure and Child Well-Being: Integrating Family Complexity, Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1, pp. 177-190, (2015); Brown C.S., Stone E.A., Gender Stereotypes and Discrimination: How Sexism Impacts Development, Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 50, pp. 105-133, (2016); Chambers C., The Marriage-Free State, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 113, 2, pp. 123-143, (2013); Against Marriage: An Egalitarian Defense of the Marriage-Free State, (2017); Renee D., Jennett M., Deconstructing Heteronormativity in Primary Schools in England: Cultural Approaches to a Cultural Phenomenon, Challenging Homophobia: Teaching about Sexual Diversity, pp. 19-32, (2007); Ettelbrick P.L., Since When Is Marriage a Path To Liberation?, We are Everywhere: A Historical Sourcebook of Gay and Lesbian Politics, pp. 757-760, (1997); Fine M., McClelland S.I., Sexuality Education and Desire: Still Missing After All These Years, Harvard Educational Review, 76, 3, pp. 297-338, (2006); Finnis J.M., Fundamentals of Ethics, (1983); Law, Morality, and “Sexual Orientation, Notre Dame Law Review, 69, 5, pp. 1049-1076, (1994); 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights; Foddy B., Savulescu J., Time to Re-Evaluate Gender Segregation in Athletics?, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45, 15, pp. 1184-1188, (2011); George B.G., Fifty/Fifty: Ending Sex Segregation in School Sports, Ohio State Law Journal, 63, 4, pp. 1107-1164, (2002); Girgis S., George R.P., Anderson R.T., What Is Marriage?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34, 1, pp. 245-287, (2011); Gowen K.L., Winges-Yanez N., Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Youths’ Perspectives of Inclusive School-Based Sexuality Education, Journal of Sex Research, 51, 7, pp. 788-800, (2014); Hendricks J.S., Arguing with the Building Inspector about Gender-Neutral Bathrooms, Northwestern University Law Review, 113, pp. 77-96, (2018); Jones A., Becoming a “Girl”: Post-Structuralist Suggestions for Educational Research, Gender & Education, 5, 2, pp. 157-167, (1993); Koppelman A., Is Marriage Inherently Heterosexual?, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 42, pp. 51-95, (1997); Patrick L., Marriage, Procreation, and Same-Sex Unions, The Monist, 91, 3-4, pp. 422-438, (2008); Leong N., Against Women’s Sports, Washington University Law Review, 95, 5, pp. 1251-1292, (2018); Macedo S., Homosexuality and the Conservative Mind, Marriage and Same-Sex Unions: A Debate, pp. 97-114, (2003); Marks L., Same-Sex Parenting and Children’s Outcomes: A Closer Examination of the American Psychological Association’s Brief on Lesbian and Gay Parenting, Social Science Research, 41, 4, pp. 735-751, (2012); McLanahan S.S., Family Structure and the Reproduction of Poverty, American Journal of Sociology, 90, 4, pp. 873-901, (1985); Meezan W., Rauch J., Gay Marriage, Same-Sex Parenting, and America’s Children, The Future of Children, 15, 2, pp. 97-115, (2005); Moschella M., Sexual Identity, Gender, and Human Fulfillment: Analyzing the “Middle Way” Between Liberal and Traditionalist Approaches, Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, 25, 2, pp. 192-215, (2019); Pacilli M.G., Taurino A., Tost J.T., Toorn J., System Justification, Right-Wing Conservatism, and Internalized Homophobia: Gay and Lesbian Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Parenting in Italy, Sex Roles, 65, 7-8, pp. 580-595, (2011); Local Government Act, 1988, (1988)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus