CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Structuring opportunity after entry: Who has access to high quality instruction during college?
Tác giả
Roksa J.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Teachers College Record
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Background/Context: When inequality of opportunity is discussed in higher education, it typically pertains to access to college. Ample research has examined sociodemographic inequalities in transition to higher education and enrollment in particular types of institutions. Although providing valuable insights, social stratification research does not dedicate the same attention to students' experiences during college and, more specifically, to inequalities in instructional quality. Research Questions: Conceptualizing opportunity in terms of instructional quality, I address two specific questions: First, do students from all sociodemographic groups report similar levels of instructional quality? And second, do students report changes in instructional quality during their time in college? Research Design: This study relies on data from three cohorts of students who entered college in the fall of 2006, 2007, and 2008 and were followed through the end of their senior year in the Wabash National Study (WNS) of Liberal Arts Education. In addition to students' background characteristics, WNS includes detailed information regarding students' college experiences, including instruction. Results: The results reveal a substantial amount of variability in students' reports of instructional quality. Notably, this variation is not systematically related to students' sociodemographic characteristics, net of controls. However, the results also reveal a considerable amount of path dependency, with approximately half of the students reporting the same level of instructional quality at the beginning and end of college. Academic achievement is related to students' reports of instructional quality in the first year, after which academic inertia carries students toward the end. Academic motivation, on the other hand, facilitates mobility to higher levels of instructional quality over time and is particularly beneficial for students who begin college reporting a low level of instructional quality. Conclusion: Reported patterns offer insights into social stratification and path dependence of students' experiences during college. Moreover, patterns of stability and change in students' reports of instructional quality have implications for studies of college impact. The article concludes with reflections on different conceptualizations of instructional quality and recommendations for future research. © Teachers College, Columbia University.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adelman C., The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college, (2006); Armstrong E.A., Hamilton L.T., Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality, (2013); Arum R., Roksa J., Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses, (2011); Astin A.W., What matters in college? Four critical years revisited, (1993); Blaich C., How do students change over four years of college, (2011); Bowen W.G., Chingos M.M., McPherson M.S., Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America's public universities, (2009); Bozick R., Lauff E., Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002): A first look at the initial postsecondary experiences of the sophomore class of 2002 (NCES 2008-308), (2007); Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., Cocking R.R., How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, (2000); Braxton J.M., Olsen D., Simmons A., Affinity disciplines and the use of principles of good practice for undergraduate education, Research in Higher Education, 39, 3, pp. 299-318, (1998); Breen R., Jonsson J.O., Analyzing educational careers: A multinomial transition model, American Sociological Review, 65, 5, pp. 754-772, (2000); Buchmann C., Gender inequalities in the transition to college, Teachers College Record, 111, 10, pp. 2320-2346, (2009); Buchmann C., Di Prete T.A., The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement, American Sociological Review, 71, 4, pp. 515-541, (2006); Burniske J., Meibaum D., The use of student perceptual data as a measure of teaching effectiveness, (2012); Camburn E.M., College completion among students from high schools located in large metropolitan areas, American Journal of Education, 98, 4, pp. 551-569, (1990); Carbonaro W., Ellison B., Covay E., Gender inequalities in the college pipeline, Social Science Research, 40, 1, pp. 120-135, (2011); Charles C., Fischer M., Mooney M., Massey D., Taming the river: Negotiating the academic, financial, and social currents in selective colleges and universities, (2009); Chickering A., Gamson Z., Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education, AAHE Bulletin, 39, pp. 3-7, (1987); Chickering A., Gamson Z., Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education, (1991); Cruce T.M., Wolniak G.C., Seifert T.A., Pascarella E.T., Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college, Journal of College Student Development, 47, 4, pp. 365-383, (2006); Davies S., Guppy N., Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education, Social Forces, 75, 4, pp. 1417-1438, (1997); Deil-Amen R., Lopez-Turley R., A review of the transition to college literature in sociology, Teachers College Record, 109, 10, pp. 2324-2366, (2007); Deil-Amen R., Rosenbaum J., The social prerequisites of success: Can college structure reduce the need for social know-how, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 586, pp. 120-143, (2003); Delbanco A., College: What it was, is, and should be, (2012); Gamoran A., American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the 21st century, Sociology of Education, 75, pp. 135-153, (2001); Goyette K., Mullen A., Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequence of undergraduate field of study, Journal of Higher Education, 77, 3, pp. 497-538, (2006); Grodsky E., Jackson E., Social stratification in higher education, Teachers College Record, 111, 10, pp. 2347-2384, (2009); Hallinan M., Tracking: From theory to practice, Sociology of Education, 67, pp. 79-91, (1994); Hearn J.C., Academic and nonacademic influences on the college destinations of 1980 high school graduates, Sociology of Education, 64, 3, pp. 158-171, (1991); Holland J.L., Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments, (1997); Jencks C., Philips M., The Black-White test score gap, (1998); Kao G., Thompson J., Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment, Annual Review of Sociology, 29, pp. 417-442, (2003); Karen D., Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980-1992, Sociology of Education, 75, 3, pp. 191-210, (2002); Kelly S., Social class and tracking within schools, The way class works, pp. 210-224, (2007); Kerckhoff A.C., Diverging pathways: Social structure and career deflections, (1993); Kuh G.D., Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement, Change, 33, 3, pp. 10-17, (2001); Kuh G.D., High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter, (2008); Kuh G.D., Cruce T.M., Shoup R., Kinzie J., Gonyea R.M., Unmasking the effects of student engagement on college grades and persistence, Journal of Higher Education, 79, 5, pp. 540-563, (2008); Kuh G.D., Kinzie J., Buckley J.A., Bridges B.K., Hayek J.C., What matters to student success: A review of the literature, (2006); Lucas S., Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects, American Journal of Sociology, 106, 6, pp. 1642-1690, (2001); Marsh H.W., Roche L.A., Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility, American Psychologist, 52, 11, pp. 1187-1197, (1997); Massey D., Charles C., Lundy G., Fischer M., The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America's selective colleges and universities, (2003); Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching project, (2010); Mood C., Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it, European Sociological Review, 26, 1, pp. 67-82, (2010); Neumann A., Staking a claim on learning: What we should know about learning in higher education and why, Review of Higher Education, 37, 2, pp. 249-267, (2014); Pascarella E.T., Cruce T., Umbach P.D., Wolniak G.C., Kuh G.D., Carini R.M., Zhao C.-M., Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link, Journal of Higher Education, 77, 2, pp. 251-285, (2006); Pascarella E., Cruce T., Wolniak G., Blaich C., Do liberal arts colleges really foster good practices in undergraduate education, Journal of College Student Development, 45, 1, pp. 57-74, (2004); Pascarella E., Salisbury M., Blaich C., Exposure to effective instruction and college student persistence: A multi-institutional replication and extension, Journal of College Student Development, 52, 1, pp. 4-19, (2011); Pascarella E., Terenzini P., How college affects students : A third decade of research, 2, (2005); Pascarella E., Wang J.S., Trolian T., Blaich C., How the instructional and learning environments of liberal arts colleges enhance cognitive development, Higher Education, 66, 5, pp. 569-583, (2013); Pascarella E., Wolniak G., Seifert T., Cruce T., Blaich C., Liberal arts colleges and liberal arts education: New evidence on impacts, (2005); Perna L.W., Titus M.A., Understanding differences in the choice of college attended: The role of state public policies, Review of Higher Education, 27, 4, pp. 501-525, (2004); Robinson K., The rise of choice in the U.S, university and college: 1910-2005. Sociological Forum, 26, 3, pp. 601-622, (2011); Roksa J., Grodsky E., Arum R., Gamoran A., Changes in higher education and social stratification in the United States, Stratification in higher education: A comparative study, pp. 165-191, (2007); Seifert T., Gillig B., Hanson J., Pascarella E., Blaich C., The conditional nature of high impact/good practices on student learning outcomes, Journal of Higher Education, 85, 4, pp. 531-564, (2014); Seifert T., Pascarella E., Goodman K., Salisbury M., Blaich C., Liberal arts colleges and good practices in undergraduate education: Additional evidence, Journal of College Student Development, 51, 1, pp. 1-22, (2010); Shulman L.S., Teaching as community property: Essays on higher education, (2004); Shulman L.S., The wisdom of practice: Essays on learning, teaching, and learning to teach, (2004); Smart J.C., Feldman K.A., Ethington C.A., Academic disciplines: Holland's theory and the study of college students and faculty, (2000); Smart J.C., Umbach P.D., Faculty and academic environments: Using Holland's theory to explore differences in how faculty structure undergraduate courses, Journal of College Student Development, 48, 2, pp. 183-195, (2007); Stevens M., Armstrong E., Arum R., Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education, Annual Review of Sociology, 34, pp. 127-151, (2008); Stuber J., Inside the college gates: How class and culture matter in higher education, (2011); Trolian T., Kilgo C., Pascarella E., Roksa J., Blaich C., Wise K., Race and exposure to good teaching during college, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, (2014); Umbach P.D., Faculty cultures and college teaching, The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective, pp. 263-318, (2007)
Nơi xuất bản
Teachers College, Columbia University
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus