CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Effects of monetary reward and punishment on information checking behaviour
Tác giả
Li S.Y.W.; Cox A.L.; Or C.; Blandford A.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Applied Ergonomics
Số trích dẫn
9
DOI
10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.012
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Two experiments were conducted to examine whether checking one's own work can be motivated by monetary reward and punishment. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a flat-rate payment for completing the task (Control); payment increased for error-free performance (Reward); payment decreased for error performance (Punishment). Experiment 1 (N = 90) was conducted with liberal arts students, using a general data-entry task. Experiment 2 (N = 90) replicated Experiment 1 with clinical students and a safety-critical 'cover story' for the task. In both studies, Reward and Punishment resulted in significantly fewer errors, more frequent and longer checking, than Control. No such differences were obtained between the Reward and Punishment conditions. It is concluded that error consequences in terms of monetary reward and punishment can result in more accurate task performance and more rigorous checking behaviour than errors without consequences. However, whether punishment is more effective than reward, or vice versa, remains inconclusive. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society.
Từ khóa
Error; Punishment; Reward
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allwood C.M., Error detection processes in statistical problem solving, Cognitive Sci., 8, 4, pp. 413-437, (1984); Back J., Cheng W.L., Dann R., Curzon P., Blandford A., Does Being Motivated to Avoid Procedural Errors Influence Their Systematicity? People and Computers XX-engage, pp. 151-157, (2007); Barchard K.A., Pace L.A., Preventing human error: the impact of data entry methods on data accuracy and statistical results, Comput. Hum. Behav., 27, 5, pp. 1834-1839, (2011); Barchard K.A., Verenikina Y., Improving data accuracy: selecting the best data checking technique, Comput. Hum. Behav., 29, 5, pp. 1917-1922, (2013); Baysari M.T., Westbrook J.I., Richardson K.L., Day R.O., The influence of computerized decision support on prescribing during ward-rounds: are the decision-makers targeted?, J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc., 18, 6, pp. 754-759, (2011); Blavier A., Rouy E., Nyssen A.-S., De Keyser V., Prospective issues for error detection, Ergonomics, 48, 7, pp. 758-781, (2005); Brumby D.P., Cox A.L., Back J., Gould S.J., Recovering from an interruption: investigating speed- accuracy trade-offs in task resumption behavior, J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., 19, 2, (2013); Byrne M.D., Davis E.M., Task structure and postcompletion error in the execution of a routine procedure, Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc., 48, 4, pp. 627-638, (2006); Chelazzi L., Perlato A., Santandrea E., Della Libera C., Rewards teach visual selective attention, Vis. Res., 85, pp. 58-72, (2013); Cohen J., A power primer, Psychol. Bull, 112, 1, (1992); Dambacher M., Hubner R., Schlosser J., Monetary incentives in speeded perceptual decision: effects of penalizing errors versus slow responses, Front. Psychol., 2, (2011); Dekker S.W., Just culture: who gets to draw the line?, Cognit. Technol. Work, 11, 3, pp. 177-185, (2009); Ellis J., Prospective Memory or the Realization of Delayed Intentions: a Conceptual Framework for Research, Prospective Memory: Theory and Applications, pp. 1-22, (1996); Ehrlich S.F., Rayner K., Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading, J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav, 20, 6, pp. 641-655, (1981); Engelmann J.B., Damaraju E., Padmala S., Pessoa L., Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance: transient and sustained motivational effects, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 3, (2009); Gray W.D., Boehm-Davis D.A., Milliseconds matter: an introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior, J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., 6, 4, pp. 322-335, (2000); Gray W.D., Fu W.-T., Soft constraints in interactive behavior: the case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head, Cognit. Sci., 28, 3, pp. 359-382, (2004); Jaensch S.L., Baysari M.T., Day R.O., Westbrook J.I., Junior doctors' prescribing work after-hours and the impact of computerized decision support, Int. J. Med. Inf., 82, 10, pp. 980-986, (2013); Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension, Psychol. Rev, 87, 4, (1980); Kirk R.E., Practical significance: a concept whose time has come, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 56, 5, pp. 746-759, (1996); Lane D.M., HyperStat Online Statistics Textbook, (1993); Lin C.-J., Wu C., Factors affecting numerical typing performance of young adults in a hear-and-type task, Ergonomics, 54, 12, pp. 1159-1174, (2011); Lourens P.F., Theoretical perspectives on error analysis and traffic behaviour, Ergonomics, 33, 10-11, pp. 1251-1263, (1990); Magrabi F., Li S.Y., Day R.O., Coiera E., Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects, J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc., 17, 5, pp. 575-583, (2010); Muir H.C., Bottomley D.M., Marrison C., Effects of motivation and cabin configuration on emergency aircraft evacuation behavior and rates of egress, Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., 6, 1, pp. 57-77, (1996); Norman D.A., Categorization of action slips, Psychol. Rev., 88, 1, (1981); Nyssen A.S., Blavier A., Error detection: a study in anaesthesia, Ergonomics, 49, 5-6, pp. 517-525, (2006); Potts G.F., Impact of reward and punishment motivation on behavior monitoring as indexed by the error-related negativity, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 81, 3, pp. 324-331, (2011); Rayner K., Visual attention in reading: eye movements reflect cognitive processes, Mem. Cognit, 5, 4, pp. 443-448, (1977); Rayner K., Eye movements in reading and information processing, Psychol. Bullet, 85, 3, (1978); Rayner K., Duffy S.A., Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity, Mem. Cognit, 14, 3, pp. 191-201, (1986); Reason J., Human Error, (1990); Rizzo A., Bagnara S., Visciola M., Human error detection processes, Int. J. man-machine Stud., 27, 5, pp. 555-570, (1987); Sellen A.J., Detection of everyday errors, Appl. Psychol., 43, 4, pp. 475-498, (1994); Skitka L.J., Mosier K., Burdick M.D., Accountability and automation bias, Int. J. Human Comput. Stud., 52, 4, pp. 701-717, (2000); Sturmer B., Nigbur R., Schacht A., Sommer W., Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control, Front. Psychol., 2, (2011); Waersted M., Bjorklund R.A., Westgaard R.H., The effect of motivation on shoulder-muscle tension in attention-demanding tasks, Ergonomics, 37, 2, pp. 363-376, (1994); White R.E., Trbovich P.L., Easty A.C., Savage P., Trip K., Hyland S., Checking it twice: an evaluation of checklists for detecting medication errors at the bedside using a chemotherapy model, Qual. Saf. Health Care, 19, 6, pp. 562-567, (2010); Woods D.D., Dekker S., Cook R., Johannesen L., Sarter N., Behind Human Error, (2010); Zapf D., Maier G.W., Rappensperger G., Irmer C., Error detection, task characteristics, and some consequences for software design, Appl. Psychol., 43, 4, pp. 499-520, (1994); Zapf D., Reason J.T., Introduction: human errors and error handling, Appl. Psychol., 43, 4, pp. 427-432, (1994); Zola D., Redundancy and word perception during reading, Percept. Psychophys., 36, 3, pp. 277-284, (1984)
Nơi xuất bản
Elsevier Ltd
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus