CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Academic departments as networks of informal learning: faculty development at liberal arts colleges

Tác giả

Pifer M.J.; Baker V.L.; Lunsford L.G.

Năm xuất bản

2015

Source title

International Journal for Academic Development

Số trích dẫn

18

DOI

10.1080/1360144X.2015.1028065

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946180222&doi=10.1080%2f1360144X.2015.1028065&partnerID=40&md5=76d8747bdd637622a6cfa627ccb032b7

Tóm tắt

In this article, we consider the role of departmental contexts and relationships in faculty work within liberal arts colleges. Knowledge about how departmental networks relate to success and satisfaction may inform the work of those who support faculty work in liberal arts colleges, as well as other institution types. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative survey data from faculty members at 13 liberal arts colleges in the US suggests that informal departmental relationships influence faculty experiences. Findings suggest that departmental leaders and colleagues are sources of professional development and support, but that counter-productive behaviours interfere with such support and foster negative workplace cultures. © 2015, © 2015 Taylor & Francis.

Từ khóa

academic departments; faculty development; informal networks; liberal arts colleges

Tài liệu tham khảo

Austin A.E., Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career, The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 1, pp. 94-122, (2002); Austin A.E., Supporting faculty members across their careers, A guide to faculty development, pp. 363-378, (2010); Baker V.L., Baldwin R.G., Makker S., Where are they now? Revisiting Breneman’s study of liberal arts colleges, Liberal Education, 98, 3, pp. 48-53, (2012); Baker V.L., Lunsford L.G., Pifer M.J., Systems alignment for comprehensive faculty development in liberal arts colleges, To Improve the Academy, 34, pp. 1-2, (2015); Chopp R., Frost S., Weiss D.H., Remaking college: Innovation and the liberal arts, (2013); Dahlander L., McFarland D.A., Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time, Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 1, pp. 69-110, (2013); de Janasz S.C., Sullivan S.E., Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professorial network, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 2, pp. 263-283, (2004); Duryea E.D., The academic corporation: A history of college and university governing boards, (2000); Foote K.E., Solem M.N., Toward better mentoring for early career faculty: Results of a study of US geographers, International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 1, pp. 47-58, (2009); Golde C.M., Dore T.M., At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education, (2001); Hearn J.C., Anderson M.S., Conflict in academic departments: An analysis of disputes over faculty promotion and tenure, Research in Higher Education, 43, 5, pp. 503-529, (2002); Kezar A., Non-tenure-track faculty’s social construction of a supportive work environment, Teachers College Record, 115, pp. 1-47, (2013); Lewis K.G., Faculty development in the United States: A brief history, International Journal for Academic Development, 1, 2, pp. 26-33, (1996); Niehaus E., O'Meara K., Invisible but essential: The role of professional networks in promoting faculty agency in career advancement, Innovative Higher Education, 40, 2, pp. 159-171, (2014); Ouellett M.L., Overview of faculty development, A Guide to Faculty Development, pp. 3-20, (2010); Pascarella E.T., Cruce T.M., Wolniak G.C., Blaich C.F., Do liberal arts colleges really foster good practices in undergraduate education?, Journal of College Student Development, 45, 1, pp. 57-74, (2004); Pataraia N., Margaryan A., Falconer I., Littlejohn A., Falconer J., Discovering academics’ key learning connections, Journal of Workplace Learning, 26, 1, pp. 56-72, (2014); Pifer M.J., Intersectionality in context: A mixed-methods approach to researching the faculty experience, Using mixed-methods approaches to study intersectionality in higher education, pp. 27-44, (2011); Pifer M.J., Baker V.L., Managing the process: The intradepartmental networks of early-career academics, Innovative Higher Education, 38, 4, pp. 323-337, (2013); Ponjuan L., Conley V.M., Trower C., Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues, The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 3, pp. 319-346, (2011); Redden E., The liberal arts, abroad, Inside HigherEd, (2009); Reder M., Effective practices in the context of small colleges, A guide to faculty development, pp. 293-308, (2010); Roxa T., Martensson K., Significant conversations and significant networks – exploring the backstage of the teaching arena, Studies in Higher Education, 34, 5, pp. 547-559, (2009); Saldana J., The coding manual for qualitative researchers, (2013); Sorcinelli M.D., Austin A.E., Eddy P.L., Beach A.L., Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present, (2006); Thelin J.R., A history of American higher education, (2011); Tierney W.G., Rhoads R.A., ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6, (1993); Tight M., Researching higher education, (2003); Wright M., Always at odds? Congruence in faculty beliefs about teaching at a research university, The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 3, pp. 331-353, (2005)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus