CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Flashlight: Using bizup’s beam to illuminate the rhetoric of research
Tác giả
Rubick K.
Năm xuất bản
2015
Source title
Reference Services Review
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.1108/RSR-10-2014-0047
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Purpose – This paper aims to demonstrate how a librarian at a liberal arts college partnered with a professor of rhetoric and media studies to teach students methods to classify sources using Bizup’s BEAM. Design/methodology/approach – Students in rhetorical criticism, read the Bizup article on BEAM. The library instruction included a discussion of the article and an application exercise where students classified cited references in a peer-reviewed journal article using BEAM. Findings – BEAM was a valuable addition to the rhetorical criticism course. The application exercise used in the library instruction session introduced BEAM as a tool to be used in reading and evaluating sources. Students were able to apply what they learned as they selected, deciphered and interpreted sources of information for use in their academic writing. Practical implications – Librarians teaching in a variety of academic disciplines may use or adapt BEAM as a tool for helping students learn to critically evaluate information sources, as they read texts and as they engage in research-based writing assignments. Originality/value – This work showcases how librarians using BEAM can extend library teaching beyond traditional bibliographic instruction and into the realm of critical inquiry. It also demonstrates how librarians can use BEAM to initiate conversations with academic faculty about information literacy. It also contributes to an emerging area of scholarship involving the use of BEAM to teach source evaluation. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Từ khóa
BEAM; Collaborative instruction; Information literacy; Liberal arts colleges; Library instruction west; Partnerships
Tài liệu tham khảo
Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, (2000); (2014); Bean J.C., Backward design: Towards an effective model of staff development in writing in the disciplines, Writing in the Disciplines, pp. 215-236, (2011); Bean J.C., Engaging Ideas the Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom, (2011); Bejune M., Building the Wikipedia-Proof Assignment, (2014); Bizup J., BEAM: A rhetorical vocabulary for teaching research-based writing, Rhetoric Review, 27, 1, pp. 72-86, (2008); Brockriede W., Rhetorical criticism as argument, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 2, pp. 165-174, (1974); Doherty B., BEAM Illustrated: Class Handout, (2014); Farkas M., Focus on Evidence, Not Sources-Parts 1 and 2: Portland State University Library, (2013); Fister B., Welcome to the Palace of Ambiguity, (2013); Francoeur S., A Better System for Classifying Sources, (2010); Ganski K., Flipping Freshman Composition Library Instruction, (2013); Ganski K., Woodward K., What Could a Writer Do with This Source, (2013); Ivey R., Information literacy: How do librarians and academics work in partnership to deliver effective learning programs?, Australian Academic &Amp; Research Libraries, 34, 2, pp. 100-113, (2003); Jones M., Teaching research across disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and information literacy, Interdisciplinarity and Academic Libraries, pp. 167-181, (2012); Messner M., Legitimizing wikipedia: How US national newspapers frame and use the online encyclopedia in their coverage, Journalism Practice, 5, 2, pp. 145-160, (2011); Meulemans Y.N., Carr A., Not at your service: building genuine faculty-librarian partnerships, Reference Services Review, 41, 1, pp. 80-90, (2013); Nutefall J., Ryder P.M., The timing of the research question: First-year writing faculty and instruction librarians differing perspectives”, Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 10, 4, pp. 437-449, (2010); Rubick ., [Ili-L] Bizup’s BEAM in Library Instruction-Summary, (2014); Scharf E., Introduction to the History of Western Art: IBEAM, (2014); Shields K., Online info lit modules and English composition: An experiment in hybrid pedagogy, Presented at the Innovative Library Classroom Conference, (2014); Simon C., Strategy Guide: Using the Think-Pair-Share Technique, National Council of Teachers of English, (2014); Troutman P., How to Use Sources Effectively in Expert Writing, (2009); Walk M.S., Y2 Seminar: Thinking Functionally about Sources, (2014); Daly E., Clarifying Research Jargon #267: Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, what?!”,, (2012)
Nơi xuất bản
Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus