CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Autonomy
Tác giả
Podschwadek F.
Năm xuất bản
2022
Source title
Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-84021-1_4
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This chapter has a closer look at the role of autonomy in political liberalism and what implication a requirement for citizens’ autonomy has for political liberal education. Political liberalism rejects any reliance on substantive conceptions of autonomy which are connected to comprehensive ethical views that are not necessarily shared by all reasonable citizens. Instead, political liberalism insists on so-called political autonomy of individuals which pertains only to their roles as citizens. The just state is not supposed to be concerned with peoples’ autonomy beyond this requirement, according to Rawls. However, from a perspective of education it appears hard to make sense of a concept of political autonomy without having first a concept of personal autonomy. Therefore, this chapter argues, the political liberal state must care about the development of citizens’ individual autonomy as well. Yet this does not mean that political liberalism needs to endorse a substantive notion of autonomy, as the concept of individual autonomy that can serve as a precursor for political autonomy is only a weak one without deeper connections to any substantive ethical views. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Từ khóa
Compulsory education; Political autonomy; Procedural autonomy; Rationality; Self-authorship
Tài liệu tham khảo
Archard D., Children: Rights and Childhood, (2004); Aviram A., The Justification of Compulsory Education: The Still Neglected Moral Duty, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 20, 1, pp. 51-58, (1986); Benn S.I., A Theory of Freedom, (1990); Michael B., Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30, 3, pp. 258-296, (2001); Brighouse H., School Choice and Social Justice, (2003); John Philip C., Autonomy, Self-Knowledge, and Liberal Legitimacy, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, pp. 330-358, (2009); The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-Historical Selves, (2011); Colburn B., Forbidden Ways of Life, The Philosophical Quarterly, 58, 233, pp. 618-629, (2008); Autonomy and Liberalism, (2013); Costa M.V., Rawlsian Civic Education: Political Not Minimal, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21, 1, pp. 1-14, (2004); Dworkin G., The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, (2001); Dworkin R., Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, (2002); Elster J., Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, (2001); Feinberg J., Autonomy, The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy, pp. 27-53, (1989); The Child’s Right to an Open Future, Philosophy of Education: An Anthology, pp. 112-123, (2011); Frankfurt H.G., Autonomy, Necessity, and Love, Necessity, Volition, and Love, pp. 129-141, (1999); Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person, The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, pp. 11-25, (2009); Gaus G.F., The Place of Autonomy Within Liberalism, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, pp. 272-306, (2009); The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in A Diverse and Bounded World, (2011); Hinchliffe G., Education, Liberty and Authority: Justifying Compulsory Education, Philosophical Perspectives on Compulsory Education, pp. 35-47, (2014); Hurka T., Why Value Autonomy?, Social Theory and Practice, 13, 3, pp. 361-382, (1987); Kant I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, (2014); Killmister S., The Woody Allen Puzzle: How “Authentic Alienation” Complicates Autonomy, Noûs, 49, 4, pp. 729-747, (2015); Kleinig J., Compulsory Schooling, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 15, 2, pp. 191-203, (1981); Kymlicka W., Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, (1996); Laborde C., Female Autonomy, Education and the Hijab, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 9, 3, pp. 351-377, (2006); Larmore C.E., Political Liberalism, The Morals of Modernity, pp. 121-151, (1996); Levinson M., The Demands of Liberal Education, (2004); Mill J.S., On Liberty, On Liberty and Other Essays, pp. 5-130, (2008); Oshana M., Personal Autonomy and Society, Journal of Social Philosophy, 29, 1, pp. 81-102, (1998); Autonomy and the Question of Authenticity, Social Theory and Practice, 33, 3, pp. 411-429, (2007); Pettit P., Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, (1997); Quong J., Liberalism without Perfection, (2011); Rawls J., Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, (2001); Rawls J., 2005A. a Theory of Justice; Political Liberalism, (2005); Raz J., The Morality of Freedom, (2009); Reich R., Opting Out of Education: Yoder, Mozert, and the Autonomy of Children, Educational Theory, 52, 4, pp. 445-461, (2002); Skinner Q., The Paradoxes of Political Liberty, Equal Freedom: Selected Tanner Lectures on Human Values, pp. 15-38, (1995); Liberty before Liberalism, (1998); Strawson P.F., Freedom and Resentment, Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, pp. 1-28, (2008); Sunstein C.R., The Partial Constitution, (1993); Tooley J., Reclaiming Education, (2005)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus