CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

‘Re-thinking a Bachelor of Arts for the 21st-Century precariat’

Tác giả

Carson J.

Năm xuất bản

2022

Source title

Studies in Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

2

DOI

10.1080/03075079.2021.1916906

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104802830&doi=10.1080%2f03075079.2021.1916906&partnerID=40&md5=94c69a462f31cac075ee53d7bfbeb357

Tóm tắt

The emergence of the neo-liberal university, rapid changes to the world of work and the unravelling of the Western social contract in an era of fake news and pandemic have created a set of circumstances that define emerging university graduates as members of a global precariat. Several projections of the future world of work suggest a need to shift the imperatives of a university education away from career preparation and disciplinary training and toward a set of skills and capacities that are similar to those that hold the core of a liberal arts education. Notwithstanding public doubt and neo-liberal antipathy, with a bit of re-thinking the Bachelor of Arts can emerge as the essential degree for 21st-century-undergraduates. © 2021 Society for Research into Higher Education.

Từ khóa

Bachelor of Arts; knowledge ecology; liberal arts; precariat

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alvargonzalez D., Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25, pp. 387-403, (2011); Arum R., Roksa J., Cook A., Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcome and Assessment for the 21st Century, (2016); Augsburg T., Becoming Transdisciplinary: The Emergence of the Transdisciplinary Individual, World Futures, 70, pp. 233-247, (2014); Basil B., Solomon J., Pedagogy, Identity and the Construction of a Theory of Symbolic Control: Basil Bernstein Questioned by Joseph Solomon, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, pp. 265-279, (1999); Bernstein B., Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique, (2000); Blyth C., On Time: Finding Your Pace in a World Addicted to Fast, (2017); Brown R., Carasso H., Everything for Sale? The Marketisation of UK Higher Education, (2013); Carson J.T., Blueprints of Distress?: Why Quality Assurance Frameworks and Disciplinary Education Cannot Sustain a 21st-Century Education, Teaching in Higher Education, 24, pp. 1014-1023, (2019); Carter C., Lapum J.L., Lavallee L.F., Martin L.S., Explicating Positionality: A Journey of Dialogical and Reflexive Storytelling, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, pp. 362-376, (2014); (2018); Clarke M.C., Off the Beaten Path: Some Creative Approaches to Adult Learning, New Update on Adult Learning Theory: New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, pp. 83-91, (2001); (2019); Curtis B., (2019); Dyer-Witheford N., Species-Being and the New Commonism: Notes on an Interrupted Cycle of Struggles, The Commoner, 11, pp. 15-32, (2006); Epstein D., Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World, (2019); Esteve A., The Business of Personal Data: Google, Facebook, and Privacy Issues in the EU and the USA, International Data Privacy Law, 7, pp. 36-47, (2017); Finlayson G., Hayward D., (2010); Floridi L., Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality, (2014); Furedi F., Introduction to the Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, pp. 1-7, (2011); Gandini A., Labour Process Theory and the Gig Economy, Human Relations, 72, pp. 1039-1056, (2019); Gannaway D., Sheppard K., WIL in Liberal Arts Programs: New Approaches, Work-Integrated Learning in the 21st Century, pp. 51-66, (2017); Giri A.K., The Calling of a Creative Transdisciplinarity, Futures, 34, pp. 103-115, (2002); Graeber D., Bullsh*t Jobs: A Theory, (2018); Graff H.J., Undisciplining Knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century, (2015); Graham M., Hjorth I., Lehdonvirta V., Digital Labour and Development: Impacts of Global Digital Labour Platforms and the Gig Economy on Worker Livelihoods, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23, pp. 135-162, (2017); Guattari F., The Three Ecologies, (2000); Guattari F., Transdisciplinarity Must Become Transversality, Theory, Culture and Society, 32, pp. 131-137, (2015); Hall R., Winn J., Questioning Technology in the Development of a Resilient Higher Education, E-Learning and Digital Media, 8, pp. 343-356, (2011); Haucap J., Heimeshoff U., Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet Driving Competition or Market Monopolization?, International Economics and Economic Policy, 11, pp. 49-61, (2014); Hodgson A., A Transdisciplinary World Model, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, pp. 517-526, (2012); Jahn T., Bergmann M., Keil F., Transdisciplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization, Ecological Economics, 79, pp. 1-10, (2012); Jewkes Y., Autoethnography and Emotion as Intellectual Resources: Doing Prison Research Differently, Qualitative Inquiry, 18, pp. 63-75, (2012); Kaine S., Josserand E., The Organisation and Experience of Work in the Gig Economy, Journal of Industrial Relations, 61, pp. 479-501, (2019); Kalleberg A.L., Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition, American Sociological Review, 74, pp. 1-22, (2009); Klein J.T., Prospects for Transdisciplinarity, Futures, 36, pp. 515-526, (2004); Kostakis V., Bauwens M., Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy, (2014); Lapadat J.C., Lindsay A.C., Transcription in Research and Practice: From Standardization of Technique to Interpretive Positionings, Qualitative Inquiry, 5, pp. 64-86, (1999); Maguire K., Transdisciplinarity: Towards an Epistemology of What Matters, Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education: The Art of Collaborative Research and Collective Learning, pp. 103-115, (2018); Marin-Guzman D., (2019); Mason P., Post-Capitalism: A Guide to Our Future, (2015); McCue T.J., (2018); Montuori J., The Joy of Inquiry, Journal of Transformative Education, 6, pp. 8-26, (2008); Moretti E., New Geography of Jobs, (2013); Neary M., Winn J., Open Education: Common(s), Commonism and the New Common Wealth, Ephemera, 12, pp. 406-422, (2012); Neary M., Winn J., Against Academic Identity, Higher Education Research & Development, 35, pp. 409-412, (2016); Neary M., Winn J., Beyond Public and Private: A Framework for Co-operative Higher Education, Open Library of Humanities, 3, pp. 1-36, (2017); Neary M., Winn J., There Is an Alternative: A Report on an Action Research Project to Develop a Framework for Co-operative Higher Education, Learning and Teaching, 10, pp. 87-105, (2017); Nicolescu B., Methodology of Transdisciplinarity, World Futures, 70, pp. 186-199, (2014); Nordensvard J., The Consumer Metaphor versus the Citizen Metaphor: Different Sets of Roles for Students, The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, pp. 157-169, (2011); Perry P., (2016); Pessoa F., The Book of Disquiet, (2001); Picketty T., Capital in the Twenty-First Century, (2014); Potter E., Ecological Becoming and the Marketplace of Knowledge, Innovation and Tradition: The Arts, Humanities and the Knowledge Economy, pp. 101-112, (2004); Prescott E.C., Northern America’s Production of Technology Capital is Transforming the World Economy, Business Economics, 51, pp. 127-132, (2016); Raciti M., Marketing Australian Higher Education at the Turn of the 21st Century: A Précis of Reforms, Commercialisation and the New University Hierarchy, E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 4, pp. 32-41, (2010); Rainie L., Wellman B., Networked: The New Social Operating System, (2012); Ramadier T., Transdisciplinarity and Its Challenges: The Case of Urban Studies, Futures, 36, pp. 423-439, (2004); Robinson A.M., The Workplace Relevance of the Political Science BA and How It Might Be Enhanced: Reflections on an Exploratory Survey of the NGO Sector, PS: Political Science and Politics, 46, pp. 147-153, (2013); Rosenblatt R., Beet, (2009); Satterfield J.M., Spring B., Brownson R.C., Mullen E.J., Newhouse R.P., Walker B.B., Whitlock E.P., Toward a Transdisciplinary Model of Evidence-Based Practice, Milbank Quarterly, 87, pp. 368-390, (2009); Sill D.J., Integrative Thinking, Synthesis, and Creativity in Interdisciplinary Studies, Journal of General Education, 45, pp. 129-151, (1996); Snider L., Enabling Exploitation: Law in the Gig Economy, Critical Criminology, 26, pp. 563-577, (2018); Thomas K.D., Taxing in the Gig Economy, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166, pp. 2-18, (2018); Walsh L., (2017); Wood A.J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V., Hjorth I., Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy, Work, Employment and Society, 33, pp. 56-75, (2019); Young M., The Future of Education in a Knowledge Society: The Radical Case for a Subject-Based Curriculum, Pacific-Asian Education, 22, pp. 21-32, (2010); Young M., Overcoming the Crisis in Curriculum Theory: A Knowledge-Based Approach, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, pp. 101-118, (2013)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus