CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Making Philosophy of Science Education Practical for Science Teachers

Tác giả

Janssen F.J.J.M.; van Berkel B.

Năm xuất bản

2015

Source title

Science and Education

Số trích dẫn

13

DOI

10.1007/s11191-014-9735-5

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84925481210&doi=10.1007%2fs11191-014-9735-5&partnerID=40&md5=463da5daeca6adc486cc4eb9c044450d

Tóm tắt

Philosophy of science education can play a vital role in the preparation and professional development of science teachers. In order to fulfill this role a philosophy of science education should be made practical for teachers. First, multiple and inherently incomplete philosophies on the teacher and teaching on what, how and why should be integrated. In this paper we describe our philosophy of science education (ASSET approach) which is composed of bounded rationalism as a guideline for understanding teachers’ practical reasoning, liberal education underlying the why of teaching, scientific perspectivism as guideline for the what and educational social constructivism as guiding choices about the how of science education. Integration of multiple philosophies into a coherent philosophy of science education is necessary but not sufficient to make it practical for teachers. Philosophies are still formulated at a too abstract level to guide teachers’ practical reasoning. For this purpose, a heuristic model must be developed on an intermediate level of abstraction that will provide teachers with a bridge between these abstract ideas and their specific teaching situation. We have developed and validated such a heuristic model, the CLASS model in order to complement our ASSET approach. We illustrate how science teachers use the ASSET approach and the CLASS model to make choices about the what, the how and the why of science teaching. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arnold K.H., Didactics (didactic models) and learning, Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, pp. 986-990, (2012); Bailey C.H., Beyond the present and the particular: A theory of liberal education, (1984); Bateson P., Laland K.N., Tinbergen’s four questions: an appreciation and an update, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 12, pp. 712-718, (2013); Belland B.R., Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pp. 505-518, (2014); Bereiter C., Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper’s world 3, Educational researcher, 23, pp. 21-26, (1994); Bergen C.T.A., van der Meer M.M., van der Otterlo S.G., Tijdsbesteding leraren voortgezet onderwijs, (2009); Borko H., Jacobs J., Koellner K., Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development, International encyclopedia of education, pp. 548-555, (2010); Bunge M., Chasing reality: Strife over realism, (2006); Callebaut W., Scientific perspectivism: A philosopher of science’s response to the challenge of big data biology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 1, pp. 69-80, (2012); Campagnolo D., Camuffo A., The concept of modularity in management studies: A literature review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 3, pp. 259-283, (2010); Chi M.T., Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise, Expertise in mathematics instruction, pp. 17-39, (2011); Chinn C.A., Buckland L.A., Samarapungavan A.L.A., Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology, Educational Psychologist, 46, 3, pp. 141-167, (2011); Cobb P., Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development, Educational researcher, 23, 7, pp. 13-20, (1994); Collins A., Greeno J., Resnick L.B., Cognition and learning, Handbook of educational psychology, pp. 15-46, (1996); Corno L., On teaching adaptively, Educational Psychologist, 43, pp. 161-173, (2008); Cuypers S.E., Martin C., Reading RS Peters on education today, (2011); Dam M., Janssen F.J.J.M., van Driel J.H., Concept-context onderwijs leren ontwerpen en uitvoeren—Een onderwijsvernieuwing praktisch bruikbaar maken voor docenten [How to make concept-context education practical], Pedagogische Studiën, 90, 2, pp. 63-77, (2013); Darling-Hammond L., Bransford J., Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, (2007); De Corte E., Historical developments in the understanding of learning, Educational research and innovation the nature of learning using research to inspire practice: Using research to inspire practice, pp. 35-60, (2010); Doyle W., Ponder G., The ethic of practicality and teacher decision-making, Interchange, 8, pp. 1-12, (1977); Giere R.N., Scientific perspectivism, (2010); Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W., Heuristic decision making, Annual Review of Psychology, 62, pp. 451-482, (2011); Grandy R.E., Constructivisms, scientific methods, and reflective judgement in science education, The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education, pp. 358-380, (2009); Hammond K.R., Beyond rationality: The search for wisdom in a troubled time, (2007); Hirst P.H., Peters R.S., The logic of education, (1971); Janssen F.J.J.M., de Boer E., Dam M., Westbroek H.B., Wieringa N., Design research on developing teaching repertoires, Educational design research. Introduction and illustrative cases, pp. 757-780, (2013); Janssen F.J.J.M., de Hullu A.E., A toolkit for stimulating productive thinking, Journal of Biological Education, 43, pp. 21-28, (2008); Janssen F.J.J.M., de Hullu A.E., Tigelaar D.H., Positive experiences as input for reflection by student teachers, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14, pp. 115-127, (2008); Janssen F.J.J.M., de Hullu A.E., Tigelaar D.H., Using a domain-specific model to improve student teachers’ reflections on positive teaching experiences, Action in Teacher Education, 31, 2, pp. 86-98, (2009); Janssen F.J.J.M., Westbroek H.B., Doyle W., Practicality studies: How to move from what works in principle to what works in practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, (2014); Janssen F.J.J.M., Westbroek H.B., Doyle W., The practical turn in teacher education. Designing a preparation sequence for core practice frames, Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 3, pp. 195-206, (2014); Janssen F.J.J.M., Westbroek H.B., Doyle W., van Driel J.H., How to make innovations practical, Teachers College Record, 115, 7, pp. 1-43, (2013); Janssen F.J.J.M., Westbroek H.B., van Driel J.H., How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers, Instructional Science, 42, pp. 67-90, (2014); Kennedy M.M., Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform, (2005); Kirschner P.A., Van Merrienboer J.J.G., Ten steps to complex learning: A new approach to instruction and instructional design, 21st century education: A reference handbook, pp. 244-253, (2008); Mahner M., Bunge M., Foundations of biophilosophy, (1997); Matthews M.R., Israel Scheffler on the role of history and philosophy of science in science teacher education, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 16, 1-2, pp. 159-173, (1997); Matthews M.R., Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism in science education, Constructivism in science education, pp. 1-10, (1998); Mayer R.E., Learning and Instruction, (2008); Mayr E., This is biology: The science of the living world, (1997); Merrill M.D., First principles of instruction, (2012); Mulcahy D.G., The educated person: Toward a new paradigm for liberal education, (2008); Paas F., Van Merrienboer J.J.G., Van Gog T., Designing instruction for the contemporary learning landscape, APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching, (2011); Peters R.S., Aims of education. A conceptual inquiry, Philosophy of education, pp. 11-57, (1973); Peters R.S., Ambiguities in liberal education and the problem of its content’, Education and the education of teachers, pp. 46-67, (1977); Sandoval W.A., Reiser B.J., Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry, Science Education, 88, 3, pp. 345-372, (2004); Schulz R.M., Philosophy of education and science education: A vital but underdeveloped relationship. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (Vol. II, Ch. 39, pp, (2014); Schwab J.J., The practical: Arts of eclectic, The School Review, 79, pp. 493-542, (1971); Shah J.Y., Kruglanski A.W., Structural dynamics: The challenge of change in goal systems, Handbook of motivation science, pp. 217-235, (2008); Simon H.A., Models of man. Social and rational. Mathematical essays on rational behavior in a social setting, (1957); Simon H.A., The sciences of the artificial, (1996); Tinbergen N., On the aims and methods of ethology, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20, pp. 410-433, (1963); Van Berkel B., The structure of current school chemistry—A quest for conditions for escape, (2005); Van Berkel B., De Vos W., Verdonk A.H., Pilot A., Normal science education and its dangers: The case of school chemistry, Science & Education, 9, 2, pp. 123-159, (2000); Van de Pol J., Volman M., Beishuizen J., Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research, Educational Psychology Review, 22, 3, pp. 271-296, (2010); Wimsatt W.C., Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality, (2007); Zeitz C.M., Some concrete advantages of abstraction. How experts’ representations facilitate reasoning, Expertise in context, pp. 43-65, (1997)

Nơi xuất bản

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus