From liberal education to general education: Change and continuity in the philosophy of university education
Mei Yee L.
2012
General Education and the Development of Global Citizenship in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China: Not Merely Icing on the Cake
1
10.4324/9780203083154-11
General education as a curriculum concept appeared with the campaign to reform the higher education curriculum in the United States at the beginning of the twentieth century. Advocated by a small number of scholars, it was rst tried in various forms in different colleges. The lack of consistency in the philosophies that supported the various experiments and the differences in the processes of implementation and outcomes resulted in much criticism and debate. After World War II, with the increasing number of students entering university and with the shock of the devastating war, general education was given a second look by universities. Notwithstanding, on more than one occasion in the 1970s it was described as the “disaster area” of the undergraduate curriculum (Lucas, 1994, p. 268), which led to serious reviews and reforms of general education. Since the 1980s, numerous universities have been busy reviewing and redening their general education curricula. Following the ups and downs in the general education movement, not only has general education become a basic component of the undergraduate curriculum of most American universities (Johnson, 2002, p. 10), 1 but the importance attached to it by universities has only increased (Johnson, Ratcliff and Gaff, 2004, p. 10).2 Additionally, general education has progressively received greater attention in places outside the United States. In 2000, the Task Force on Higher Education and Society convened by the World Bank and UNESCO published a research report on the prospects of higher education in developing countries in the twenty-rst century. The report devotes a whole chapter to explaining the importance of general education and encourages the relevant countries to ensure that, while they are developing higher education, at least some of their universities provide a broad-based general education (Task Force on Higher Education and Society, 2000, pp. 117-18).3. © 2013 Xing Jun, Ng Pak-sheung and Cheng Chunyan.
Greater Expectations: A New Vision for Learning as a Nation Goes to College, (2002); Boyer E.L., Levine A., A Quest for Common Learning, (1981); General Education in a Free Society, (1945); Conant J.B., Introduction, In Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society, (1945); Cross T.P., An Oasis of Order: The Core Curriculum at Columbia College, (1995); Howie G., Aristotle on Education, (1968); Huang K., General Education in American Universities - The Rise of the American Spirit, (2006); Johnson D.K., General Education 2000 - A National Survey: How General Education Changed Between 1989 and 2000, (2002); Johnson D.K., Ratcliff J.L., Creating Coherence: The Unfinished Agenda, Changing General Education Curriculum, pp. 85-96, (2004); Johnson D.K., Ratcliff J.L., Gaff J.G., A Decade of Change in General Education, Changing General Education Curriculum, pp. 9-28, (2004); Kerr C., The Uses of the University, (2001); Lewis H.R., Excellence without a Soul: How a Great University Forgot Education, (2006); Li M., General Education - A View on University Education, (1999); Lucas C.J., American Higher Education: A History, (1994); Miller G.E., The Meaning of General Education: The Development of the General Education Paradigm and Practices, (1985); Smith V., New Dimension for General Education, Higher Learning in America 1980-2000, pp. 243-258, (1993); Higher Education in Developing Countries: Peril and Promise, (2000); The American Curriculum: A Documentary History, pp. 25-38, (1993); Zhang F., Selection of Works on Education in Ancient Greece, (1994)
Taylor and Francis
Book chapter
Scopus