CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The Question Concerning Curriculum
Tác giả
Hodge S.
Năm xuất bản
2015
Source title
SpringerBriefs on Key Thinkers in Education
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-19806-4_6
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Heidegger’s philosophy and direct contributions to educational thought do not make it easy to envisage a form of curriculum that can promote openness to Being. Much debate goes on about curriculum already. There are arguments that curriculum should be about appreciating the achievements of human culture, or about preparing for the demands of life in the modern world, or about the meaning that learners make of experience—or some combination of these. This chapter considers these three curriculum orientations from the perspective of Heidegger’s philosophy. His critiques of the Tradition and humanism undermine the idea that curriculum should be about appreciating culture. His critique of the instrumental mindset challenges the idea that curriculum should focus on the demands of modern living. That curriculum should be a matter of developing the learner and that the learner’s experience is itself a form of curriculum appears to be more consistent with Heidegger’s thinking. However, it is argued that although a curriculum oriented to awakening the sense of Being has a similar starting point to a curriculum oriented to the learner’s experience, it takes a different direction: into the disclosure of Being itself. The chapter goes on to describe a vision of an ontological curriculum that goes some way toward answering the question of what a curriculum could be like from the perspective of Heidegger’s philosophy. © 2015, The Author(s).
Từ khóa
Curriculum; Liberal arts; Poetry; Technology
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bernstein B., Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique, (2000); Bonnett M., Teaching thinking, and the sanctity of content, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29, 3, pp. 295-309, (1995); Bonnett M., Education as a form of the poetic: A Heideggerian approach to learning and the teacher—pupil relationship, Heidegger, Education, and Modernity, (2002); Brady L., Kennedy K.J., Curriculum Construction, (2013); Doll W.E., Ghosts of the curriculum, Curriculum Visions, (2002); Egan K., The Educated Mind: How Cognitive Tools Shape Our Understanding, (2007); Gagne R., The Conditions of Learning, (1985); Gordon H., Heidegger on Poetry and Thinking: Some Educational Implications, (2000); Hamilton D., Curriculum History, (1990); Heidegger M., Existence and Being, (1949); Heidegger M., Being and Time (Trans. Macquarrie and Robinson), (1962); Heidegger M., What is Called Thinking, (1968); Heidegger M., The Question concerning Technology and Other Essays, (1977); Heidegger M., The self-assertion of the German University (1933, The Heidegger Controversy. a Critical Reader, (1993); Heidegger M., (1998); Heidegger M., Heidegger on the art of teaching (trans. & ed. Allen & Axiotis, Heidegger, Education, and Modernity, (2002); Heidegger M., Being and time (trans. Stambaugh, rev, Schmidt), (2010); Hodge S., The origins of competency-based training, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 47, 2, pp. 179-209, (2007); Hodge S., The return of the gods: Heidegger and mythopoetic curriculum theory, Spirituality, Mythopoesis and Learning, (2009); Huebner D., Curriculum as concern for man’s temporality, Theory into Practice, 6, 4, pp. 172-179, (1967); Macdonald J.B., Theory as a Prayerful Act, (1995); Marsh C.J., Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum, (2007); Heidegger, Education, and Modernity, (2002); Pinar W., Currere: Toward reconceptualisation, Curriculum Theorizing. the Reconceptualists, (1975); Pinar W., The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10, 3, pp. 205-214, (1975); Pinar W., Grummett M.R., Toward a Poor Curriculum, (1976); Pinar W., Reynolds W.M., Slattery P., Taubman P.M., Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses, (1995); Schubert W.H., Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, And Possibility, (1985); Spanos W., The End of Education: Toward Posthumanism, (1993); Taylor C., Modern Social Imaginaries, (2004); Thomson I.D., Heidegger on ontological education, or how we become what we are, Heidegger, Education, and Modernity, (2002); Thomson I.D., Heidegger on Ontotheology. Technology and the Politics of Education, (2005); Tyler R., Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, (1949)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus