Six Credit Hours for Arizona, the United states, and the World: A Case Study of Teacher Content-Knowledge Preparation and the Creation of Social Studies Courses
Turchi L.B.; Hinde E.R.; Dorn R.I.; Ekiss G.O.
2015
Rethinking Social Studies Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century
2
10.1007/978-3-319-22939-3_8
The Teaching Foundations Project, part of a collaborative federally funded initiative, addressed the social studies content-area knowledge of future elementary teachers through the combined efforts of university faculty in teacher education and liberal arts and sciences, along with faculty from community colleges in Arizona. The project developed two courses combining history, political science, geography, and economics. The chapter describes the development, evaluation, piloting, and institutionalization of the courses, highlighting three themes: the opportunities and challenges in aligning different institutions in shared commitments to teacher preparation; resources as a lever for change brings tensions of compliance and cooperation across institutions; and the identification and operationalization of theories about what content and pedagogy future elementary teachers need, particularly when faculty from university in teacher education and liberal arts and sciences, as well as community colleges in Arizona, are all working together. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016.
Content knowledge; Federal investments; Teacher education reforms; Twenty-first century learning
Bencze J.L., Promoting student-led science and technology projects in elementary teacher education: Entry into core pedagogical practices through technological design, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 1, pp. 43-62, (2010); Darling-Hammond L., Constructing 21st-century teacher education, Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 3, pp. 300-314, (2006); Dentith A., Developing globalized teacher education curriculum through interdisciplinarity, Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 13, 12, pp. 77-92, (2011); Hawley T., Crowe A., Brooks E., Where do we go from here? Making sense of prospective social studies teachers’ memories, conceptions, and visions of social studies teaching and learning, Teacher Education Quarterly, 39, 3, pp. 63-83, (2012); Labaree D., The Trouble with Ed Schools, (2004); Lampert N., Critical thinking dispositions as an outcome of undergraduate education, JGE: The Journal of General Education, 56, 1, pp. 17-33, (2007); Mason M., Critical thinking and learning, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 4, pp. 339-349, (2007); Ritter J.K., Modeling powerful social studies: Bridging theory and practice with preservice elementary teachers, The Social Studies, 103, 3, pp. 117-124, (2012); Smith T., Ware D., Cochran R., Shores M., Mathematical Investigations in Inquirybased Courses for Pre-Service Teachers, (2010); Sullivan C., Modeling the model: The use of classroom talk in teaching socioconstructivist pedagogy in a social studies teacher education setting, Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46, 2, pp. 24-32, (2011); Taylor A., Jones M.G., Broadwell B., Oppewal T., Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists’ and teachers’ perceptions of science education, Science Education, 92, 1058–, (2008); Zeichner K., Pena-Sandoval C., Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the u. S.: The role of the new schools venture fund, Teachers College Record, 117, 6, (2015)
Springer International Publishing
Book chapter
Scopus