CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Scientific Literacy for Participation: A Systemic Functional Approach to Analysis of School Science Discourses
Tác giả
Knain E.
Năm xuất bản
2015
Source title
Scientific Literacy for Participation: A Systemic Functional Approach to Analysis of School Science Discourses
Số trích dẫn
29
DOI
10.1007/978-94-6209-896-1
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Scientific literacy is approached on the premise that language is key to understand the nature of both learning and participation, in scientists' practices as well as in liberal education for citizenship. Some of the questions that are addressed in the book are: • What does it take to be able to participate in different arenas in society involving science? • How does everyday language relate to scientific language? • How can students' texts be analyzed to gain insights into their learning? • How can images be analyzed alongside verbal language? This book offers a thorough introduction to key ideas in M. A. K. Halliday's systemic functional grammar through examples and practical analysis. Detailed analysis is offered of science textbooks and curriculum documents, classroom talk, experimental work, and students' discussions of complex environmental issues. Further, an analytical model guiding the design and analysis of science learning discourses is introduced. The book starts with introducing excerpts from whole-class discussions, group work, experimental reports and textbooks as text-in-context. From this starting point, key aspects of language are carefully explained. The role of grammatical metaphor in the development of science knowledge is an important topic throughout the book. Tools for analyzing multimodal representations, intertextuality and multiple voices are also among the topics covered for understanding and analyzing school science discourses. © 2015 Sense Publishers. All Rights Reserved.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aikenhead G.S., Border crossing into the subculture of science, Studies in Science Education, 27, pp. 1-52, (1996); Bakhtin M.M., Speech Genres & Other Late Essays, (1986); Baldry A., Thibault P.J., Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. a Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook, (2005); Barton D., Directions for literacy research: Analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world, Language and Education, 15, 2-3, pp. 92-104, (2001); Barton D., Lee C., Language Online. Investigating Digital Texts and Practices, (2013); Bazerman C., Shaping written knowledge, The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, (1988); Berge K.L., Flottum K., The rhetoric of science in practice–Experiences from Nordic Research on subject oriented texts and text cultures, Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Newcastle, (2007); Berge K.L., Kjeldsen J.E., Grue J., Rhetoric and the study of texts, text norms and text cultures, Scandinavian Studies in Rhetoric. Rhetorica Scandinavica 1997–2010 (Pp. 88–105). Åstorp, (2012); Bor D., The ravenous brain, How the New Science of Consciousness Explains Our Insatiable Search for Meaning, (2012); Borg C., Gericke N., Hoglund H.-O., Bergman E., The barriers encountered by teachers implementing education for sustainable development: Discipline bound differences and teaching traditions, Research in Science & Technological Education, 30, 2, pp. 185-207, (2012); Brandt T., Brandt H., Fonstad T., Naturfag 5-Timers Kurs. Oslo, Norway, (2000); Torija A.B., Progression in complexity: Contextualizing sustainable marine resources management in a 10th grade classroom, Research in Science Education, 42, pp. 5-23, (2012); Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid P., Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, 18, 1, pp. 32-42, (1989); Buxton C.A., Creating contextually authentic science in a “low-performing” urban elementary school, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 7, pp. 695-721, (2006); Bones O., Veim S., Naturlig Nok. Naturfag for Yrkesfaglige Studieretninger, (2000); Byhring A.K., Knain E., Intertextuality for Handling Complex Environmental Issues; Cobern W.W., Aikenhead G.S., Fraser B.J., Tobin K.G., Cultural aspects of learning science, International Handbook of Science Education, 2, pp. 39-52, (1998); Dewey J., Experience & Education, (1938); Drexhage J., Murphy D., Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio, (2010); Driver R., Leach J., Millar R., Scott P., Young people's images of science, Buckingham, (1996); Driver R., Newton P., Osborne J., Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms, Science Education, 84, pp. 287-312, (2000); Ekeland P.R., Johansen O.-I., Rygh O., Strand S.B., Tellus, (1997); Fairclough N., The Dialectics of Discourse. Textus, 14, 2, pp. 3-10, (2001); Fairclough N., Language and Power, (2001); Finstad H.S., Kolderup J., Jorgensen E.C., Trigger. Elevbok Naturfag 8. Klasse, (2006); Flewitt R., Hampel R., Hauck M., Lancaster L., Jewitt C., What are multimodal data and transcription, The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, pp. 44-59, (2013); Furberg A., Kluge A., Ludvigsen S., Student sensemaking with science diagrams in a computer-based setting, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 1, pp. 41-64, (2013); Furberg A., Ludvigsen S., Students' meaning-making of socio-scientific issues in computer mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 13, pp. 1775-1799, (2008); Gee J.P., Social Linguistics and Literacies, (2008); Giddens A., The Politics of Climate Change, (2009); Givry D., Roth W.-M., Toward a new conception of conceptions: Interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 10, pp. 1086-1109, (2006); Halliday M.A.K., Webster J., Language and Social Man, pp. 65-130, (1974); Halliday M.A.K., Webster J., The Act of Meaning, pp. 375-389, (1992); Halliday M.A.K., Halliday M.A.K., Martin J.R., On the language of physical science, Writing Science. Literacy and Discursive Power, pp. 54-68, (1993); Halliday M.A.K., Towards a language-based theory of learning, Linguistics and Education, 5, pp. 93-116, (1993); Halliday M.A.K., Webster J., On Language in Relation to the Evolution of Human Consciousness, pp. 390-432, (1995); Halliday M.A.K., Martin J.R., Veel R., Things and relations: Regrammaticing experience as technical knowledge, Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, pp. 185-235, (1998); Halliday M.A.K., On the "Architecture" of Human Language. in J. Webster (Ed.), on Language and Linguistics. London, (2003); Halliday M.A.K., Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar, (2013); Halliday M.A.K., Hasan R., Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective, (1989); Haug B., Odegaard M., From words to concepts: Focusing on word knowledge when teaching for conceptual understanding within an inquiry-based science setting, Research in Science Education, 44, 5, pp. 777-800, (2014); Hodge R., Kress G., Language as Ideology, (1993); Hodson D., Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 2, pp. 115-135, (1996); Hodson D., Time for action: Science education for an alternative future, International Journal of Science Education, 25, 6, pp. 645-670, (2003); Hodson D., Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values, Rotterdam, (2009); Hsu P.-L., Roth W.M., From a sense of stereotypically foreign to belonging in a science community: Ways of experiential descriptions about high school students’ science internship, Research in Science Education, 40, pp. 291-311, (2010); Ivanic R., Writing and identity, Amsterdam, (1998); Jenkins E.W., Pulic understanding of science and science education for action, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, pp. 601-611, (1994); Jewitt C., Technology, Literacy, Learning. a Multimodal Approach, (2006); Jewitt C., Jewitt C., Different approaches to multimodality, The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, pp. 31-43, (2013); Jewitt C., Jewitt C., An introduction to multimodality, The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, pp. 15-30, (2013); Jewitt C., Kress G., Ogborn J., Tsatsarelis C., Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of a science classroom, Educational Review, 53, 1, pp. 5-18, (2001); Kahneman D., Thinking, Fast and Slow, (2011); Kirch S.A., Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: A comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at work, Science Education, 94, 2, pp. 308-335, (2009); Kjeldsen J.E., Andersen O., Berge K.L., Retoriske kvaliteter i billeder, Retorikkens Relevans, 9, pp. 91-114, (2003); Kjeldsen J.E., Retorikk I vår Tid. En innføring I Moderne Retorisk Teori, (2004); Knain E., Den generelle læreplanen: Mellom danning og tilpasning, Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 83, 1, pp. 85-95, (1999); Knain E., Sense and sensibility in science education: Developing rational beliefs through cultural approaches, Studies in Science Education, 33, pp. 1-29, (1999); Knain E., Ideologies in school science textbooks, International Journal of Science Education, 23, 3, pp. 319-329, (2001); Knain E., Seeing, Drawing and Knowing the Onion Cell. Tensions in Meaning and Identity in Experimental Reports. Paper Presented at the 2Nd International Conference on Multimodality. Kristiansand, pp. 14-16, (2004); Knain E., Identity & genre literacy in high-school students’ experimental reports, International Journal of Science Education, 27, 5, pp. 607-624, (2005); Knain E., Bjonness B., Kolsto S.D., Knain E., Kolsto S.D., Rammer og støttestrukturer i utforskende arbeidsmåter, Elever Som Forskere I Naturfag, pp. 85-126, (2011); Knain E., Byhring A.K., Nordby M., Bruk Av læremidler I Komplekse miljøspørsmål. En Case Studie I Prosjektet Ark&App, Naturfaglig Studieprogram Vg1. Rapport Til Utdanningsdirektoratet, (2014); Knain E., Flyum K.H., Flottum K., Rastier F., Genre as a Resource for Science Education: The History of The Development of The Experimental Report, pp. 181-205, (2003); Kolsto S.D., Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues, Science Education, 85, pp. 291-310, (2001); Kragh H., Cosmology and controversy, The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe, (1996); Kress G., Literacy in the New Media Age, (2003); Kress G., Jewitt C., What is Mode?, pp. 60-75, (2013); Kress G., Jewitt C., Ogborn J., Tsatsarelis C., Multimodal Teaching and Learning. the Rhetorics of the Science Classroom, (2001); Kress G., van Leeuwen T., Reading Images. the Grammar of Visual Design, (2006); Lederman N.G., Lederman J.S., Fraser B.J., Tobin K., McRobbie C.J., Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professonal development, Second International Handbook of Science Education, (2012); Lemke J.L., Talking science: Language, Learning and Values, (1990); Liberg C., Af Geijerstam A., Folkeryd J.W., Linder C., Ostman L., Roberts D.A., Wickman P.-O., Erickson G., Mackinnon A., Scientific literacy and students' movability in science texts, Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy, (2011); Linder C., Ostman L., Roberts D.A., Wickman P.-O., Erickson G., Mackinnon A., Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy, (2011); Lunde T., När läroplan Och Tradition möts. Om lärerfortbildning Och undersökande Aktiviteters Syfte Inom Den Laborativa No-Undervisningen I Grundskolans Senare Del (Vol, (2014); Machin D., Mayr A., How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis, (2012); Macken-Horarik M., Johns A.M., Something to Shoot For": A Systemic Functional Approach to Teaching Genre in Secondary School Science, pp. 17-42, (2002); Martin J.R., Rose D., Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause, (2003); Maybin J., Literacy under and over the desk: Oppositions and heterogeneity, Language and Education, 21, 6, pp. 515-530, (2007); Mehan H., What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse, Theory into Practice, 28, 4, pp. 285-294, (1979); Mestad I., Kolsto S.D., Using the concept of ZPD to explore the challenges of and opportunities in designing discourse activities based on practical work, Science Education, 98, 6, pp. 1054-1076, (2014); Meyer P.G., Markkanen R., Shroder H., Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim, Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, pp. 21-41, (1997); Miller C.R., Genre as social action, Genre and the New Rhetoric, pp. 23-42, (1984); Murgatroyd S., ‘Wicked problems’ and the work of the school, European Journal of Education, 45, 2, pp. 259-279, (2010); Murphy P., Lunn S., Jones H., The impact of authentic learning on students’ engagement with physics, The Curriculum Journal, 17, 3, pp. 229-246, (2006); Nordby M.S., Knain E., Elevers møte med komplekse utfordringer i digitale spill i naturfag, Nordic Studies in Science Education, 10, 2, pp. 195-211, (2014); Norris S.P., Phillips L.M., How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy, Science Education, 87, 2, pp. 224-240, (2003); Oreskes N., Conway E.M., Merchants of doubt, How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, (2010); Ostman L., Socialisation Och Mening. No-Utbildning Som Politiskt Och miljömoraliskt Problem (Uppsala Studies in Education, (1995); Petraglia J., The real world of a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educatonial technology, Edcational Technology Research and Development, 46, 3, pp. 53-65, (1998); Roberts D.A., Fensham P., What counts as science education?, Development and Dilemmas in Science Education, pp. 27-54, (1988); Roberts D.A., Abell S.K., Lederman N.G., Scientific literacy/science literacy, Handbook of Research on Science Education, pp. 729-779, (2007); Roberts D.A., Linder C., Ostman L., Roberts D.A., Wickman P.-O., Erickson G., Mackinnon A., Competing visions of scientific literacy. The influence of a science curriculum policy image, Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy, pp. 11-27, (2011); Roth W.-M., Doing Qualitative Research. Praxis of Method, (2005); Roth W.-M., Lawless D., Science, culture and the emergence of language, Science Education , 86, pp. 368-385, (2002); Roth W.-M., Pozzer-Ardenghi L., Young Han J., Critical Graphiacy. Undersanding Visual Representation Practices in School Science, (2005); Ryder J., Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy, Studies in Science Education , 36, pp. 1-44, (2001); Sadler T.D., Sadler T.D., Socio-scientific isses-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI, Socio-Scientific Issues in the Classroom, pp. 355-369, (2011); Sadler T.D., Barab S., Scott B., What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry ?, Research in Science Education , 37, pp. 371-391, (2007); Sadler T.D., Klosterman M.L., Topcu M.S., Sadler T.D., Learning science content and socio-scientific reasoning through classroom explorations of global climate change, Socio Scientific Issues in the Classroom, pp. 45-77, (2011); Sadler T.D., Zeidler D.L., Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 1, pp. 112-138, (2005); Seah L.H., Clarke D.J., Hart C.E., Understanding the language demands on science students from an integrated science and language perspective, International Journal of Science Education, 36, 6, pp. 952-973, (2013); Selander S., Kress G., Design för lärande - ett multimodalt perspektiv, Stockholm, (2010); Sfard A., On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27, 2, pp. 4-13, (1994); Shaffer D.W., Resnick M., Thick, Authencitiy: New Media and Authentic Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research , 10 (2), 195–215, (1999); Shapin S., The Scientific Revolution, (1996); Shen B.S.P., Day S.B., Science literacy and the public understanding of science, Communication of Scientific Information. Basel, (1975); Siljan H., Metaforisering, nominalisering og normering. En teoretisk studie av grammatisk metafor og to empiriske undersøkelser av språktrekket i læreboktekster, Universitetet I Oslo, (2011); Simonneaux L., Bruguiere C., Tiberghien A., Clement P., Questions socialement vives and socio-scientific issues: New trends of research to meet the training needs of postmodern society, Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. 9Th ESERA Selected Conference Contributions, pp. 37-54, (2014); Sindoni G., Systemic-Functional Grammar and Multimodal Studies. an Introductin with Text Analysis, (2011); Sjoberg S., Naturfag Som Allmenndannelse. En Kritisk Fagdidaktikk (3. Utgave), (2009); Sterling S., Sustainable Education, (2001); Tang K.-S., Delgado C., Moje E.B., An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education, Science Education, 98, 2, pp. 305-326, (2014); Tang K.S., Tan S.C., Yeo J., Students’ multimodal construction of the work–energy concept, International Journal of Science Education, 33, 13, pp. 1775-1804, (2011); Curriculum for Primary, Secondary and Adult Education in Norway. Retrieved March 11, (1993); Tytler R., Prain V., Hubber P., Waldrip B., Constructing Representations to Learn in Science. Rotterdam, (2013); van Leeuwen T., It was just like magic–A multimodal analysis of children's writing, Linguistics and Education, 10, 3, pp. 273-305, (2000); Veel R., Christie F., Martin J.R., Learning how to mean–scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school, Genre and Institutions. Social Processes in the Workplace and School, pp. 161-195, (1997); Wallace C.S., Framing new research in science literacy and language use: Authenticity, multiple discourses, and the “third space’’, Science Education, 88, 6, pp. 901-914, (2004); Wallace C.S., Hand B., Prain V., Writing and Learning in the Science Classroom (Vol, (2004); Walters L.C., Aydelotte J., Miller J., Putting more public in policy analysis, Public Administration Review, 60, 4, pp. 349-359, (2000); Watson J.D., Crick F.H.C., Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid, Nature, 171, 4365, pp. 737-738, (1953); Wellington J., Osborne J., Language and Literacy in Science Education, (2001); Wells G., Dialogic Inquiry. Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education, (1999); Zeidler D.L., Sadler T.D., Applebaum S., Callahan B.E., Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1, pp. 74-101, (2009); Ziman J., Real Science. What It Is, and What It Means, (2000)
Nơi xuất bản
Sense Publishers
Hình thức xuất bản
Book
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus