CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Can EFL Speakers Communicate in English-mediated Classes?: A Case of a Liberal Arts Class for Engineering Students in Korea

Tác giả

Choi J.; Tatar B.; Kim J.

Năm xuất bản

2014

Source title

Journal of Intercultural Communication Research

Số trích dẫn

5

DOI

10.1080/17475759.2014.989254

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84918570009&doi=10.1080%2f17475759.2014.989254&partnerID=40&md5=dc953bf86eba5afea5fd153af64e776d

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to explore what factors prevent English as a foreign language (EFL) students from participating in English-medium instruction classes; and (2) to examine how dialogic teaching techniques enhance students’ participation in classroom interaction. Utilizing the notions of “communicative competence” and “truncated repertoire,” we first investigated the barriers to communication in classrooms. We next examined how EFL speakers are able to communicate in English-medium instruction (EMI) classes. The findings suggest that when the instruction was designed to reduce cultural barriers and to facilitate authentic discussion, EFL students were able to participate in classroom interaction, and they perceived discussion as a way to learn an unfamiliar subject taught in English. © 2014, World Communication Association.

Từ khóa

Authentic Discussion; Classroom Participation; Communicative Competence; Dialogic Teaching; English-medium Instruction (EMI); Truncated Repertoire

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahn K., Conceptualization of American English native speaker norms: A case study of an English language classroom in South Korea, Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, pp. 691-702, (2011); Alexander R., Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk, (2008); Alpert B., Active, silent, and controlled discussions: Explaining variations in classroom conversation, Teaching & Teacher Education, 3, pp. 29-40, (1987); Bella D.A., Plug and chug, cram and flush, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 129, 1, pp. 32-39, (2003); Blommaert J., The sociolinguistics of globalization, (2010); Blommaert J., Collins J., Slembrouck S., Spaces of multilingualism, Language & Communication, 25, pp. 197-216, (2005); Boyd M., Markarian W., Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance, Language and Education, 25, pp. 515-534, (2011); Cazden C., Classroom discourse, (1988); Cazden C., Dell Hymes’s construct of ‘communicative competence’, Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42, pp. 364-369, (2011); Chang Y., English-medium instruction for subject courses in tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students, Taiwan International ESP Journal, 2, pp. 55-84, (2010); Chen G., Chung J., The Impact of confucianism on organizational communication, Communication Quarterly, 42, pp. 93-105, (1994); Chiu Y., Facilitating Asian students’ critical thinking in online discussions, British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, pp. 42-57, (2009); Cho J., Campus in English or campus in shock?, English Today, 28, pp. 18-25, (2012); Collins J., Socialization to text: Structure and contradiction in schooled literacy, Natural histories of discourse, pp. 203-228, (1996); Duff P., The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream, Applied Linguistics, 23, pp. 289-322, (2002); Haneda M., Wells G., Learning science through dialogic inquiry: Is it beneficial for English-as-additional-language students?, International Journal of Educational Research, 49, pp. 10-21, (2010); Ha M., EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in the EMI college classes, Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27, pp. 27-53, (2011); Hymes D.H., On communicative competence, Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, pp. 269-293, (1972); Kim E., Voices of learners from English-medium lectures, Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea, 18, pp. 145-163, (2002); Kim K., Korean professor and student perceptions of the efficacy of English-medium instruction, Linguistic Research, 28, pp. 711-741, (2011); Lu Y., Hsu C., Willingness to communicate in intercultural interactions between Chinese and Americans, Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, pp. 75-88, (2008); Mercer N., Dawes L., Staarman J., Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom, Language and Education, 23, pp. 353-369, (2009); Morell T., Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students, English for Specific Purposes, 23, pp. 325-338, (2004); Morell T., What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, pp. 222-237, (2007); Myhill D., Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse, Research Papers in Education, 21, pp. 19-41, (2006); Nystrand M., Gamoran A., Kachur R., Prendergast C., Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom, (1997); O'Connor M., Michaels S., Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy, Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, pp. 318-335, (1993); Oh H., Lee H., Characteristics of effective English medium instruction and support measures, Modern English Education, 11, pp. 191-202, (2010); Park J.S.Y., Naturalization of competence and the neoliberal subject: Success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20, pp. 22-38, (2010); Ryu M., But at school … I became a bit shy”: Korean immigrant adolescents discursive participation in science classrooms, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, pp. 649-671, (2013); Sacks H., Schegloff E., Jefferson G., A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, 50, pp. 696-735, (1974); Sinclair J., Coulthard M., Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils, (1975); Watson D., ‘Loss of face’ in Australian classrooms, Teaching in Higher Education, 4, pp. 355-362, (1999); Wortham S., Participant examples and classroom interaction, Linguistics and Education, 4, pp. 195-217, (1992)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus