In the streets with a degree: How political generations, educational attainment and student status affect engagement in protest politics
Olcese C.; Saunders C.; Tzavidis N.
2014
International Sociology
25
10.1177/0268580914551305
Using survey data collected at 52 major street demonstrations across five European countries during 2009–2012, this article contributes to the debate on the (contentious) politics of the highly educated in Europe. In particular, it explores which of the theories explaining student activism better capture differences in motivations and ways of engaging in protests between protesters who have a university education and those who do not. The findings build on the literature explaining student participation in protest in terms of campus-based politicization. Some support for the liberal education theory comes from the finding that protesters with a university degree are more likely to be left-wing than those without a university education. The article also provides some insights on the importance of political generations. © The Author(s) 2014.
Educación superior; Enseignement supérieur; Europa; Europe; Europe; higher education; jeunesse; juventud; mouvements sociaux; movimientos sociales; social movements; youth
Aminzade R.R., Goldstone J.A., McAdam D., Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, (2001); Bennett W.L., Segerberg A., The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics, Information, Communication and Society, 15, 5, pp. 739-768, (2012); Bourdieu P., Sociology in Question, (1993); Burawoy M., For public sociology, American Sociological Review, 70, 1, pp. 4-28, (2005); Corrigall-Brown C., Patterns of Protest: Trajectories of Participation in Social Movements, (2011); Crossley N., Making Sense of Social Movements, (2002); Crossley N., From reproduction to transformation: Social movement fields and the radical habitus, Theory, Culture and Society, 20, 43, pp. 42-69, (2003); Crossley N., Social networks and student activism: On the politicising effect of campus connections, The Sociological Review, 56, 1, pp. 18-38, (2008); Dalton R., Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, (2002); Delanty G., Challenging Knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society, (2001); Della Porta D., Diani M., Social Movements: An Introduction, (1999); Doherty B., Plows A., Wall D., ‘The preferred way of doing things’: The British direct action movement, Parliamentary Affairs, 56, 4, pp. 669-686, (2003); Downton J., Wehr P., The Persistent Activist, (1997); Edmunds J., Turner B.S., Generations, Culture and Society, (2002); Feuer L., The Conflict of Generations: The Character and Significance of Student Movements, (1969); Fendrich J., Lovoy K., Back to the future, American Sociological Review, 53, 5, pp. 780-784, (1988); Gerlach L.P., Hine V.H., People, Power, Change: Movements of Social Transformation, (1970); Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements, (2001); Gould R.V., Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871, American Sociological Review, 56, 6, pp. 716-729, (1991); Habermas J., The Theory of Communicative Action Volume II: System and Lifeworld, (1987); Hanna E., The English student movement: An evaluation of the literature, Sociology Compass, 2, 5, pp. 1539-1552, (2008); Henn M., Weinstein M., Wring D., A generation apart? Youth and political participation in Britain, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4, 2, pp. 167-192, (2002); Henn M., Weinstein M., Forrest S., Uninterested youth? Young people’s attitudes towards party politics in Britain, Political Studies, 53, 3, pp. 556-578, (2005); Howker E., Malik S., Jilted Generation: How Britain has Bankrupted its Youth, (2010); Hundal S., Why the student movement in England is essentially dead, Liberal Conspiracy, (2011); Inglehart R., The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, (1977); Inglehart R., Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity, The American Political Science Review, 75, 4, pp. 880-900, (1981); Jasper J.M., The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements, (1997); Jennings M.K., Residues of a movement: The aging of the American protest generation, The American Political Science Review, 81, 2, pp. 367-382, (1987); Kelly C., Breinlinger S., The Social Psychology of Collective Action: Identity, Injustice and Gender, (1996); Klandermans B., The Social Psychology of Protest, (1997); McAdam D., Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970, (1982); McAdam D., Recruitment to high risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer, American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1, pp. 64-90, (1986); McAdam D., Freedom Summer, (1988); McAdam D., Paulsen R., Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism, American Journal of Sociology, 99, 3, pp. 640-667, (1993); Mannheim K., Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, (1952); Marsh A., Protest and Political Consciousness, (1977); Munson Z., Mobilizing on campus: Conservative movements and today’s college students, Sociological Forum, 25, 4, pp. 769-786, (2010); Musgrove F., Ecstasy and Holiness: Counter Culture and the Open Society, (1974); Norris P., Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour, (2004); Norris P., Walgrave S., VanAelst, Who demonstrates? Anti-state rebels, conventional participants, or everyone?, Comparative Politics, 37, 2, pp. 189-205, (2005); Oberschall A., Social Conflict and Social Movements, (1973); Pirie M., Worcester R.M., The Millennial Generation, (1998); Putnam R.D., Bowling Alone: Civic Disengagement in America, (2000); Rootes C., Student radicalism: Politics of moral protest and legitimation problems of the modern capitalist state, Theory and Society, 9, 3, pp. 473-502, (1980); Rootes C., The politics of the higher educated, Melbourne Journal of Politics, 18, pp. 184-200, (1986); Rootes C., Social Movements and Social Classes, (1995); Schuetze H., Slowey M., Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education, Higher Education, 44, pp. 309-327, (2002); Schussman A., Soule S.A., Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation, Social Forces, 84, 2, pp. 1083-1108, (2005); Searle J., The Campus Wars: A Sympathetic Look at the University in Agony, (1972); Sennett R., The Spaces of Democracy, (1998); Sherkat D.E., Blocker T.J., Explaining the political and personal consequences of protest, Social Forces, 75, 3, pp. 1049-1070, (1997); Siegfried D., Between Marx and Coca-Cola: Youth Cultures in Changing European Societies 1960–1980, (2006); Sloam J., Rebooting democracy: Youth participation in politics in the UK, Parliamentary Affairs, 60, 4, pp. 548-567, (2007); Snow D.A., Zurcher L.A., Ekland-Olson S., Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment, American Sociological Review, 45, 5, pp. 787-801, (1980); Thomassen J.J.A., Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, (1990); Van Stekelenburg J., Klandermans B., Handbook of Social Movements across 24 Disciplines, (2007); Verba S., Schlozman K.L., Brady H.E., Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, (1995); Verhulst J., Van Laer J., Determinants of sustained activism across movement issues. In:, 2nd ECPR Graduate Conference; Verhulst J., Walgrave S., The first time is the hardest? A cross-national and cross-issue comparison of first-time protest participants, Political Behavior, 31, 3, pp. 455-484, (2009); Walgrave S., Verhulst J., Selection and response bias in protest surveys, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 16, 2, pp. 203-222, (2011); Willetts D., The Pinch: How the Baby Boomers Took Their Children’s Future – And Why They Should Give it Back, (2013); Wood J.L., The Sources of American Student Activism, (1974)
SAGE Publications Ltd
Article
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Scopus