CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The death of the educative subject? The limits of criticality under datafication
Tác giả
Sefton-Green J.; Pangrazio L.
Năm xuất bản
2022
Source title
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Số trích dẫn
7
DOI
10.1080/00131857.2021.1978072
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Amidst ongoing technological and social change, this article explores the implications for critical education that result from a data-driven model of digital governance. The article argues that traditional notions of critique which rely upon the deconstruction and analysis of texts are increasingly redundant in the age of datafication, where the production of information is automated and hidden. The article explains the concept of the ‘educative subject’ within the liberal education tradition, with specific focus on the role of critique and reflexivity in their becoming. It explores how the logics and practices of datafication and automation pose unprecedented challenges to the educative subject, examining three features in particular: the creation of data subjects; the rise of correlationalism; and the move from representation to operationalisation. The article concludes by outlining a research agenda to address the existential challenges posed by data education. © 2021 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.
Từ khóa
correlationalism; critical pedagogy; data education; data subjects; Datafication; post-representation
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander R., Culture and Pedagogy, (2001); Amsler S.S., The Education of Radical Democracy, (2015); Andrejevic M., Automated Media, (2020); Apple M., Au W., Gandin L.A., The Routledge International Hanbook of Critical Education, (2009); Ball S.J., Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers, Journal of Education Policy, 30, 3, pp. 299-301, (2015); Barthes R., The death of the author, Image Music Text, pp. 79-124, (1967); Bradbury A., Datafied at four: The role of data in the ‘schoolification’ of early childhood education in, England. Learning, Media and Technology, 44, 1, pp. 7-21, (2019); Brunton F., Nissenbaum H., Obfuscation: A user’s Guide for Privacy and Protest, (2015); Buckingham D., (Ed.), (1998); Castro L., Critical Pedagogy and Marx, Vygotsky and Freire, Palgrave Macmillan, (2015); Cheney-Lippold J., A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control, Theory, Culture & Society, 28, 6, pp. 164-181, (2011); Cheney-Lippold J., We are Data: Algorithms and the Making of Our Digital Selves, (2017); Couldry N., Recovering critique in an age of datafication, New Media & Society, 22, 7, pp. 1135-1151, (2020); Couldry N., Mejias U.A., The Costs of Connection: How Data is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capital, (2019); Dewey J., Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, (1916); Durkheim E., Moral Education, (2012); (2020); Foucault M., Power / Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, (1995); Freire P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed, (2017); Frischmann B., Selinger E., Re-Engineering Humanity, (2018); Gorur R., Producing calculable worlds: Education at a glance, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 4, pp. 578-595, (2015); Grek S., Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe, Journal of Education Policy, 24, 1, pp. 23-37, (2009); Hacking I., The Taming of Chance, (1990); Hearn A., Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital ‘reputation’ economy, Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10, 4, pp. 412-438, (2010); Hintz A., Dencik L., Wahl-Jorgensen K., (2019); Hunter I., Rethinking the school: Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism, (1994); Illeris K., How We Learn: Learning and Non-Learning in School and Beyond, (2007); Ilouz E., Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism, (2007); Kerssens N., van Dijck J., The platformization of primary education in The Netherlands, Learning, Media and Technology, 46, 3, pp. 250-263, (2021); Kirylo J.D., Reinventing pedagogy of the oppressed., (2020); Koopman C., How We Become Our Data. a Genealogy of the Informational Person, (2019); Kukutai T., Taylor J., Data sovereignty for indigenous peoples: Current practice and future needs, Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda, pp. 25-38, (2016); Kusche I., The old in the new: Voter surveillance in political clientelism and datafied campaigning, Big Data & Society, 7, 1, (2020); Langlois G., Elmer G., Impersonal subjectivation from platforms to infrastructures, Media, Culture and Society, 41, 2, pp. 1-18, (2019); Levinson B., Foley D., Holland D., Cultural Production of the Educated Person: Critical Ethnographies of Schooling and Local Practice, (1996); Luke A., Critical literacy, schooling, and social justice: The selected works of Allan Luke, (2018); Lupton D., Williamson B., The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights, New Media & Society, 19, 5, pp. 780-794, (2017); Manolev J., Sullivan A., Slee R., The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture, Learning, Media and Technology, 44, 1, pp. 36-51, (2019); Moro J., Against cop shit., (2020); Noble S.U., Algorithms of oppression, (2018); Pangrazio L., Selwyn N., ‘ Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data, New Media & Society, 21, 2, pp. 419-437, (2019); Perrotta C., Gulson N., Williamson B., Witzenberger K., Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom, Critical Studies in Education, pp. 1-17, (2020); Piattoeva N., Elastic numbers: national examinations data as a technology of government, Journal of Education Policy, 30, 3, pp. 316-334, (2015); Ranciere J., The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation (K, (1991); Rose N., Governing the Soul: Shaping of the Private Self, (1999); Rousseau J.-J., Emile, Or, On Education, UPNE, (2010); Ruppert E., Population objects: Interpassive subjects, Sociology, 45, 2, pp. 218-233, (2011); Sellar S., Lingard B., The OECD and global governance in education, Journal of Education Policy, 28, 5, pp. 710-725, (2013); Simondon G., The limits of human progress: A critical study, Cultural Politics: An International Journal, 6, 2, pp. 229-236, (2010); Sinha C., Situated Selves: Learning to be a learner, Learning Sites: Social and Technological Resources for Learning, pp. 32-48, (1999); Smith K., From dividual and individual selves to porous subjects, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 23, 1, pp. 50-64, (2012); van Dijck J., Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology, Surveillance & Society, 12, 2, pp. 197-208, (2014); van Dijck J., Poell T., Social media platforms and education, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, pp. 579-591, (2018); Venn C., Walkerdine V., Henriques J., Hollway W., Urwin C., Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity, (1998); Weber M., The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T, (2003); Williamson B., Hogan A., Commercialisation and Privatisation In/Of Education in the Context of Covid-19, (2020); Wylie C., Mindfuck, Grasset, (2020); Zuboff S., The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at The New Frontier of Power, (2019)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus