CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Improving learning outcomes through choice-based course delivery: The Choice Model
Tác giả
Drea J.
Năm xuất bản
2022
Source title
Journal of Education for Business
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.1080/08832323.2021.1960469
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, faculty and administrators have been called to engage in pilot studies of new educational delivery models. A pilot study was conducted during the Fall 2020 semester at a midwestern liberal arts college involving 49 undergraduate students using a new alternative course delivery format called the “Choice Model.” The Choice Model featured courses taught simultaneously in-person and broadcast in Zoom. A key feature was that each student could choose each day the mode they would attend (in-person or Zoom), and both modes) used in-class quizzes through a learning platform to keep students engaged. The results of the Choice Model included a 7.17-point increase in performance on the final exam from Marketing students, class attendance of 92.2% during a pandemic, and students reported increased engagement during class sessions. While students expressed a strong preference for the Choice Model over alternative course delivery models (in-person only, Zoom-only, a 50-50 model), a limitation found the Choice Model was that some students made suboptimal choices for their own learning outcomes. © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Từ khóa
Course delivery model; COVID-19; management; marketing; Zoom
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bault N., Rusconi E., The art of influencing consumer choices: A reflection on recent advances in decision neuroscience, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, pp. 3007-3009, (2019); Beatty B.J., Hybrid flexible course design: Implementing student directed hybrid classes, (2019); Beatty B.J., Transitioning to an online world: Using HyFlex Courses to Bridge the Gap, Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2007–world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia & telecommunications, pp. 2701-2706, (2007); Botti S., McGill A.L., When choosing is not deciding: The effect of personal responsibility on satisfaction, Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 2, pp. 211-219, (2006); Davidson College, (2020); Feather N.T., Simon J.G., Causal attributions for success and failure in relation to expectations of success based on selective or manipulative control, Journal of Personality, 39, 4, pp. 527-541, (1971); Gonzales A.L., McCrory Calarco J., Lynch T., Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct, Communication Research, 47, 5, pp. 750-770, (2018); Govindarajan V., Srivastava A., A post-pandemic strategy for U.S. higher education, Harvard Business Review, (2020); Henri D.C., Morrell L.J., Scott G.W., Student perceptions of their autonomy at university, Higher Education, 75, 3, pp. 507-516, (2018); Liberman N., Trope Y., The psychology of transcending the here and now, Science, 21, pp. 1201-1205, (2008); O'Donoghue T., Rabin M., Doing it now or later, American Economic Review, 89, 1, pp. 103-124, (1999); Scott G.W., Furnell J., Murphy C.M., Goulder R., Teacher and student perceptions of the development of learner autonomy; a case study in the biological sciences, Studies in Higher Education, 40, 6, pp. 945-956, (2014); Xu D., Jaggars S.S., Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas, The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 5, pp. 633-659, (2014)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus