The Byproducts of a Graphic Design Education: An Ethnographic Case Study
Bagchi P.
2021
Springer Series in Design and Innovation
0
10.1007/978-3-030-61671-7_55
This paper shares empirical insights gathered on the byproducts of a graphic design education. The term byproducts refer to the soft skills in communication, collaboration, and reflection developed by students studying graphic design. The data was gathered using ethnographic methods during field research for a doctoral project on transnational design education. The research explores the value of a British design education in Sri Lanka, a country with a different social, economic, and cultural context using the example of a transnational franchise partnership between a university in England and a private design institute in Sri Lanka. Upon reflection, design graduates at the Sri Lankan design institute deemed their soft skills as vital in equipping them with the resilience to navigate their local industry where academic qualifications in the field of design are not particularly valued. Accounts of professional experiences of graduates in England compared to examples of contextually specific challenges faced by graphic design students and graduates in Sri Lanka illustrate how their soft skills helped develop a sense of professional agency. The aim is to provoke considerations for contextually appropriate curricular development for transnational graphic design programs by borrowing from the essence a liberal education. © 2021, The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Design context; Soft skills; Transnational design education
Agarwal A., Data Reveals Why The ‘Soft’ In ‘Soft Skills’ Is A Major Misnomer, Forbes, (2018); Atkinson P., Transcriptions, Social Research Methods: A Reader. Routledge, (2004); British Council: National Policies Framework for International Engagement, (2016); International Mobility of Students, Research and Education provision, The Shape of Global Higher Education, (2017); Council B., Service G.A.E., Transnational Education: A Classification Framework and Data Collection Guidelines for International Programme and Provider Mobility, (2017); The evolution of transnational education: Data, definitions, opportunities and impacts analysis, The Shape of Things to Come, (2013); Buchanan R., The problem of character in design education: Liberal arts and professional specialization, Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., 11, 1, pp. 13-26, (2001); Crabtree A., Rouncefield M., Tolmie P., Doing Design Ethnography, (2012); Cross N., Designerly Ways of Knowing, (2006); Geertz C., Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture, (2001); Holmes D., Marcus G., Para-ethnography, The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, pp. 596-597, (2008); Samuel A., The Soft Skills of Great Digital Organizations, Harvard Business Review, (2016); Schon D., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, (1983); Tovey M., Design Pedagogy: Developments in Art and Design Education, (2015); Uluoglu B., Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques, Des. Stud., 21, 1, pp. 33-58, (2000); Wolff R., Where does design education begin?, Coll. Art J., 7, 4, (1948); Zakaria F., In Defense of a Liberal Education, 1st ed. W.W, Norton & Company, (2015)
Springer Nature
Book chapter
Scopus