CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Toleration, Liberal Education, and the Accommodation of Diversity
Tác giả
Hansen O.H.B.
Năm xuất bản
2021
Source title
The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_3
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Toleration is a central value in liberalism, and it is widely regarded as important for the accommodation of diversity. For these reasons, promoting toleration is also an integral part of liberal education. What such promotion should entail, however, is not entirely clear. A distinction is made between classical toleration, which requires that someone puts up with or endures what one disagrees with, and modern toleration, which conceives toleration more in terms of being openminded, unprejudiced, or appreciative towards diversity. As objectives for liberal education, both classical and modern toleration face challenges with respect to the accommodation of diversity: promoting classical toleration is an insufficient strategy for the purpose of accommodating diversity, because it falls short when it comes to changing pupil’s attitudes. Promoting modern toleration is a possible answer that challenge, but has also problems of its own, mainly related to the risk of exercising assimilative pressure on individuals and groups who do not fit a liberal mold. This chapter discusses whether a careful and dynamic combination of these strategies - a pedagogical toleration - could be more conducive to the liberal goal of accommodating diversity. This dual strategy may help to change pupils’ attitudes towards different kinds of diversity while also being attentive to those pupils and parents, who remain skeptical towards a liberal agenda, whether they are multiculturalism skeptics or autonomy skeptics. The crucial issue is how to balance this combination of the promotion of classical and modern toleration in order to achieve that. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
Từ khóa
Classical toleration; Diversity; Liberal education; Liberalism; Modern toleration; Pedagogical toleration
Tài liệu tham khảo
Citizenship for 16-19 year olds in education and training, (1998); Afdal G., Tolerance and curriculum: Conceptions of tolerance in the multicultural unitary Norwegian compulsory school, (2006); Afdal G., The maze of tolerance, International handbook of religious education, pp. 597-615, (2010); Andreassen B.A., Religionsdidaktikk, (2016); Balint P., Respecting toleration: Traditional liberalism and contemporary diversity, (2017); Bertram-Troost G., Miedema S., Semantic differences in European research cooperation from a methodological and theoretical perspective - translation and terminology, Teenagers’ perspectives on the role of religion in their lives, schools and societies, pp. 29-39, (2009); Bowen J.R., Can Islam be French? Pluralism and pragmatism in a secular state, (2010); Brettschneider C., When the state speaks, what should it say?, (2012); Brown W., Reflections on tolerance in the age of identity, Democracy and vision, pp. 99-117, (2001); Castiglione D., McKinnon K., Introduction: Beyond toleration?, Res Publica, 7, pp. 223-230, (2001); Signposts - policy and practice for teaching about religions and nonreligious world views in intercultural education, (2014); Creppell I., Toleration and identity - foundations in early modern thought, (2003); Flensner K.K., Religious education in contemporary pluralistic Sweden, (2015); Flensner K.K., von der Lippe M., Being safe from what and safe for whom? A critical discussion of the conceptual metaphor of ‘safe space’, Intercult Educ, 30, pp. 275-288, (2019); Forst R., Toleration, (2007); Forst R., Pierre Bayle’s reflexive theory of toleration, Toleration and its limits, pp. 78-113, (2008); Forst R., Toleration in conflict: Past and present, (2013); Galeotti A.E., Do we need tolerance as a moral virtue?, Res Publica, 7, pp. 273-292, (2001); Galston W., Liberal pluralism, (2002); Galston W., Anti-pluralism, (2018); Gardner P., Tolerance and education, Liberalism, multiculturalism and toleration, pp. 83-103, (1993); Grimen H., Hva er tillit?, (2009); Gutmann A., Civic education and social diversity, Ethics, 105, pp. 557-579, (1995); Hampton J., Should political philosophy be done without metaphysics?, Ethics, 99, 4, pp. 791-814, (1989); Hansen O.H.B., Promotion classical tolerance in public education: What should we do with the objection condition?, Ethics Educ, 8, 1, pp. 65-76, (2013); Heyd D., Is toleration a political virtue, Toleration and its limits, pp. 171-194, (2008); Horton J., Toleration, Blackwell encyclopedia of political thought, pp. 521-523, (1991); Horton J., Toleration as a virtue, Toleration - an elusive virtue, pp. 28-43, (1996); King P., Toleration, (1976); Larmore C., Patterns of moral complexity, (1987); Lidh C.H., Representera och bli representerad: Elever med religiös positionering talar om skolans religionskunskapsundervisning (To represent and be represented: Pupils who position themselves within a religious tradition talk about religious education in schools), (2016); McKinnon K., Toleration - a critical introduction, (2006); Muller J.W., What is populism?, (2016); Nehushtan Y., The limits of tolerance: A substantive-liberal perspective, Ratio Juris, 20, pp. 230-257, (2007); Oberdiek H., Tolerance - between forbearance and acceptance, (2001); Toledo guiding principles on teaching about religions and beliefs in public schools, (2007); Parekh B., Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory, (2000); Recommendation 1720, (2005); Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R., Wagner U., Christ O., Recent advances in intergroup contact theory, Int J Intercult Relat, 35, 3, pp. 271-280, (2011); Views about homosexuality, (2014); Ramadan T., The quest for meaning: Developing a philosophy of pluralism, (2010); Raphael D.D., The intolerable, Justifying toleration: Conceptual and historical perspectives, pp. 137-154, (1988); Rawls J., Political liberalism, (1996); Scanlon T.M., The difficulty of tolerance: Essays in political philosophy, (2003); Sunstein C., Why societies need dissent, (2003); Declaration of principles of tolerance, (1995); Walzer M., On toleration, (1997); Williams B., Toleration: An impossible virtue, Toleration - an elusive virtue, pp. 18-27, (1996); Winch C., Education, autonomy and critical thinking, (2006)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer International Publishing
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus