Comparison of teacher agency for collaboration within and across curriculum teams
Lau I.T.Y.
2021
Teacher Development
1
10.1080/13664530.2021.1942971
Teacher agency plays a vital role in professional learning. The revealing practice indicates its fluidity in the process of collaboration. Research suggests that learning through interaction happens by engaging teachers. However, the role of teacher agency remains unclear at a systemic level. This article reports a yearlong ethnographic study of overlapping members from two teams collaborating on contemporary liberal arts curriculum across two different education systems in a Hong Kong secondary school. Discourse analysis of collaborative meetings demonstrated that the overlapping members performed various functions in the two settings. The connections and disconnections suggested that teacher agency was conditional based on the ecological boundary. By identifying their patterns of practice, individual teachers collectively demonstrated different capacities in the two settings within and over time. The findings imply that collaboration is an embedded activity and strongly influenced by the school environment. Overall, this study contributes to a reconceptualisation of professional learning. © 2021 Teacher Development.
Collaboration; discourse analysis; ethnography; professional learning; teacher agency
Baker W.D., Green J.L., Limits to Certainty in Interpreting Video Data: Interactional Ethnography and Disciplinary Knowledge, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2, 3, pp. 191-204, (2007); Bandura A., Exercise of Human Agency through Collective Efficacy, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 3, pp. 75-78, (2000); Bannister N.A., Reframing Practice: Teacher Learning through Interactions in a Collaborative Group, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24, 3, pp. 347-372, (2015); Biesta G., Priestley M., Robinson S., The Role of Beliefs in Teacher Agency, Teachers and Teaching, 21, 6, pp. 624-640, (2015); Bridges S.M., Chan L.K., Hmelo-Silver C.E., Situated Learning and Educational Technologies: Theory and Practice, Educational Technologies in Medical and Health Sciences Education, pp. 1-6, (2016); Brinkmann S., Kvale S., Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, (2015); Bronfenbrenner U., Ecological Models of Human Development, Readings on the Development of Children, 2, 1, pp. 37-43, (1994); Charteris J., Dialogic Feedback as Divergent Assessment for Learning: An Ecological Approach to Teacher Professional Development, Critical Studies in Education, 57, 3, pp. 277-295, (2016); Clarke A., Triggs V., Nielsen W., Cooperating Teacher Participation in Teacher Education: A Review of the Literature, Review of Educational Research, 84, 2, pp. 163-202, (2014); Cole M., Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline, (1998); Creswell J.W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, (2013); Datnow A., Teacher Agency in Educational Reform: Lessons from Social Networks Research, American Journal of Education, 119, 1, pp. 193-201, (2012); Depelteau F., Structure and Agency Again, and Much More, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 42, 6, pp. 815-819, (2013); Edwards A., Relational Agency: Learning to Be a Resourceful Practitioner, International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 3, pp. 168-182, (2005); Edwards A., Relational Agency in Professional Practice: A CHAT Analysis, Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 3, pp. 1-17, (2007); Emirbayer M., Mische A., What Is Agency?, American Journal of Sociology, 103, 4, pp. 962-1023, (1998); Engestrom Y., Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization, Journal of Education and Work, 14, 1, pp. 133-156, (2001); Etelapelto A., Vahasantanen K., Hokka P., Paloniemi S., What Is Agency? Conceptualizing Professional Agency at Work, Educational Research Review, 10, pp. 45-65, (2013); Feeney E.J., How an Orientation to Learning Influences the Expansive–Restrictive Nature of Teacher Learning and Change, Teacher Development, 20, 4, pp. 458-481, (2016); Fung D.C.L., Lui W.M., Education Policy Analysis: Liberal Studies and National Education in Hong Kong, (2017); Gee J.P., An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, (2014); Gee J.P., Green J.L., Discourse Analysis, Learning, and Social Practice: A Methodological Study, Review of Research in Education, 23, pp. 119-169, (1998); Green J.L., Bridges S.M., Interactional Ethnography, International Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 475-488, (2018); Green J.L., Dixon C.N., Zaharlick A., Ethnography as a Logic of Inquiry, Methods of Research on Teaching the English Language Art, pp. 155-204, (2005); Greeno J.G., Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 4, pp. 537-547, (2006); Hargreaves A., O'Connor M.T., Collaborative Professionalism: When Teaching Together Means Learning for All, (2018); Herbers M.S., Antelo A., Ettling D., Buck M.A., Improving Teaching through a Community of Practice, Journal of Transformative Education, 9, 2, pp. 89-108, (2011); Horn I.S., Garner B., Kane B.D., Brasel J., A Taxonomy of Instructional Learning Opportunities in Teachers’ Workgroup Conversations, Journal of Teacher Education, 68, 1, pp. 41-54, (2017); Horn I.S., Little J.W., Attending to Problems of Practice: Routines and Resources for Professional Learning in Teachers’ Workplace Interactions, American Educational Research Journal, 47, 1, pp. 181-217, (2010); Kalthoff H., Practices of Grading: An Ethnographic Study of Educational Assessment, Ethnography and Education, 8, 1, pp. 89-104, (2013); Kramer M., Promoting Teachers’ Agency: Reflective Practice as Transformative Disposition, Reflective Practice, 19, 2, pp. 211-224, (2018); Lamont M., Molnar V., The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences, Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 1, pp. 167-195, (2002); Lave J., Wenger E., Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, (1991); Little J.W., Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 2, pp. 129-151, (1993); Little J.W., Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice, Teachers College Record, 105, 6, pp. 913-945, (2003); McNicholl J., Relational Agency and Teacher Development: A CHAT Analysis of A Collaborative Professional Inquiry Project with Biology Teachers, European Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 2, pp. 218-232, (2013); Mitchell J.C., Typicality and the Case Study, Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct, pp. 238-241, (1984); Moolenaar N.M., A Social Network Perspective on Teacher Collaboration in Schools: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, American Journal of Education, 119, 1, pp. 7-39, (2012); Opfer V.D., Pedder D., Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning, Review of Educational Research, 81, 3, pp. 376-407, (2011); Priestley M., Biesta G., Robinson S., Teachers as Agents of Change: Teacher Agency and Emerging Models of Curriculum, Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice, pp. 187-206, (2013); Priestley M., Biesta G., Robinson S., Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach, (2015); Putney L., Green J., Dixon C., Duran R., Yeager B., Consequential Progressions, Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research, pp. 86-126, (2000); Pyhalto K., Pietarinen J., Soini T., Comprehensive School Teachers’ Professional Agency in Large-Scale Educational Change, Journal of Educational Change, 15, 3, pp. 303-325, (2014); Riveros A., Newton P., Burgess D., A Situated Account of Teacher Agency and Learning: Critical Reflections on Professional Learning Communities, Canadian Journal of Education, 35, 1, pp. 202-216, (2012); Rojas-Drummond S.M., Albarran C., Littleton K.S., Collaboration, Creativity and the Co-Construction of Oral and Written Texts, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 3, pp. 177-191, (2008); Ronfeldt M., Farmer S.O., McQueen K., Grissom J.A., Teacher Collaboration in Instructional Teams and Student Achievement, American Educational Research Journal, 52, 3, pp. 475-514, (2015); Scribner J.P., Sawyer R.K., Watson S.T., Myers V.L., Teacher Teams and Distributed Leadership: A Study of Group Discourse and Collaboration, Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 1, pp. 67-100, (2007); Severance S., Penuel W.R., Sumner T., Leary H., Organizing for Teacher Agency in Curricular Co-Design, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 4, pp. 1-34, (2016); Sloan K., Teacher Identity and Agency in School Worlds: Beyond the All-Good/All-Bad Discourse on Accountability-Explicit Curriculum Policies, Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 2, pp. 119-152, (2006); Turner J.C., Christensen A., Kackar-Cam H.Z., Fulmer S.M., Trucano M., The Development of Professional Learning Communities and Their Teacher Leaders: An Activity Systems Analysis, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27, 1, pp. 49-88, (2018); Vidovich L., O'Donoghue T., Global–Local Dynamics of Curriculum Policy Development: A Case-Study from Singapore, The Curriculum Journal, 14, 3, pp. 351-370, (2003); Voogt J.M., Pieters J.M., Handelzalts A., Teacher Collaboration in Curriculum Design Teams: Effects, Mechanisms, and Conditions, Educational Research and Evaluation, 22, 3-4, pp. 121-140, (2016); Vygotsky L., Mind in Society, (1978); Williams J., Teacher Educator Professional Learning in the Third Space: Implications for Identity and Practice, Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 4, pp. 315-326, (2014); Woolley C.M., Meeting the Mixed Methods Challenge of Integration in a Sociological Study of Structure and Agency, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 1, pp. 7-25, (2009)
Routledge
Article
Scopus