Curricular considerations in world languages for advanced learners
MacFarlane B.
2021
Content-Based Curriculum for High-Ability Learners
0
10.4324/9781003233824-24
This chapter explores appropriate curriculum and instructional planning for teaching world languages to talented language students. The study of world languages has long been a valued component of a rich liberal arts education. Teacher preparation and professional development around differentiation of instruction for advanced learners is needed for an integrated second language education program to be successful. Like mathematics, second language learning provides another symbol system for providing challenge and complexity, two preferences that high-ability children demonstrate for learning new things. Like mathematics, foreign language is an easy subject to accelerate, and it is reasonably straightforward to provide appropriate instructional differentiation at key stages. With an integrated team approach between the world language teacher and the gifted education teacher, differentiated learning experiences can be developed in the curriculum. Exploration of resources in the classroom, the school, and the community is essential for maximizing opportunities for language learning. © 2017, by Taylor & Francis Group.
Allen M., Mabry E., Mattrey M., Bourhis J., Titsworth S., Burrell N., Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis, Journal of Communication, 54, pp. 402-420, (2004); American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century., (2006); American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Standards for foreign language learning., (2008); American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, ACTFL performance descriptors for language learners-2012 edition., (2012); American Educational Research Association, Research Points: Essential Information for Education Policy, 4, 1, pp. 1-4, (2006); Amselle J., Adios, bilingual ed, Policy Review, 86, pp. 52-55, (1997); Andreyeva O., Shaikhyzada Z., Communicative principle of teaching foreign language at non-linguistic specialties of the university, European Researcher, 41, pp. 354-358, (2013); Arrow K.J., Capron W.M., Dynamic shortages and price rises: The engineer-scientist case, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73, pp. 292-308, (1959); Barahona M., Preservice teachers’beliefs in the activity of learning to teach English in the Chilean context, Cultural-Historical Psychology, 10, pp. 116-122, (2014); Baska A., VanTassel-Baska J., Ancient roots and ruins., (2014); Brown E.A., Grants fund initiatives to boost number of TEMteachers, Education Daily, 43, 125, (2010); Brown H.D., Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy., (1994); Brown H.D., English language teaching in the “post-method” era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment, Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, pp. 9-18, (2002); Busse V., Walter C., Foreign language learning motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes, Modern Language Journal, 97, pp. 435-456, (2013); Butler Y.G., Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China, Research Papers in Education, 29, pp. 410-437, (2014); Butler Y., Parental factors in children’s motivation for learning English: A case in China, Research Papers in Education, 30, pp. 164-191, (2015); Chela-Flores B., Pronunciation and language learning: An integrative approach, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, pp. 85-101, (2001); Speech delivered by Hanford, G. The SAT and Statewide Assessment, Vital Speeches of the Day, 52, (1986); AP French Language and Culture: Course and exam description., (2011); Committee to Review the Title VI and Fulbright-Hays International Education Programs, International education and foreign languages: Keys to securing America’s future., (2007); Crookes G., Chaudron C., Guidelines for classroom language teaching, Teaching English as a second or foreign language, pp. 46-66, (1991); Dornyei Z., Csizer K., Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation. Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey, AppliedLinguistics, 23, pp. 421-462, (2002); Elliot A., Foreign language phonology: Field independence, attitude, and the success of formal instruction in Spanish pronunciation, Modern Language Journal, 79, pp. 530-542, (1995); Elliot A., On the teaching and acquisition of pronunciation within a communicative approach, Hispania, 80, pp. 95-108, (1997); Fares G., Zinke L., AP Spanish language teacher’s guide., (2008); Goranson D., Howland M., guide to K-12 program development in world languages., (1999); Graham S., Macfadyen T., Richards B., Learners’ perceptions of being identified as very able: Insights from modern foreign languages and physical education, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, pp. 323-348, (2012); Harvey L., Drew S., Smith M., The first year experience: A review of literature for the higher education academy., (2006); Hunton J., Fun learning activities for modern foreign languages: A complete toolkit for ensuring engagement, progress and achievement., (2015); Jorge M., Critical literacy, foreign language teaching and the education about race relations in Brazil, Latin Americanist, 56, 4, pp. 79-90, (2012); Kessler C., Quinn M.E., Positive effects of bilingualism on science problem-solving abilities, Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics: Current issues in bilingual education, pp. 295-308, (1980); Kobayashi Y., Europe versus Asia: Foreign language education other than English in Japan’s higher education, Higher Education, 66, pp. 269-281, (2013); MacFarlane B., Advanced Placement world language teacher perceptions of high ability students and differentiated instruction, (2008); MacFarlane B., Adapting world languages curricula for high-ability language learners, Content-based curriculum for gifted and talented students, pp. 283-302, (2011); MacFarlane B., Perspective from the periphery: Teaching gifted foreign language students, TEMPO, 33, 2, pp. 26-30, (2012); Met M., Research in foreign language curriculum, Handbook of research on improving student achievement, pp. 86-111, (1999); Moyer A., Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, pp. 81-108, (1999); Mulhair M., AP French language teachers guide., (2008); National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future., (2007); Norris J., Assessing advanced foreign language learning and learners: From measurement constructs to educational uses, Educating for advanced foreign language capacity: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment, pp. 167-187, (2005); Robinson A., Shore B., Enersen D., Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide., (2007); Schulz R.A., Foreign language instruction and curriculum, Education Digest, 64, 7, pp. 29-37, (1999); Shaw S., Grbic N., Franklin K., Applying language skills to interpretation: Student perspectives from signed and spoken language programs, Interpreting, 6, 1, pp. 69-100, (2004); Skorton D., Altschuler G., America’s foreign language deficit, Forbes., (2012); Snow R., Abilities in academic tasks, Mind in context: Interactionistperspectives on human intelligence, pp. 3-37, (1994); Stevens A., Marsh D., Foreign language teaching within special needs education: Learning from Europe-wide experience, Support for Learning, 20, pp. 109-114, (2005); Tedick D.J., Wesely P.M., A review of research on content-based foreign/second language education in US K-12 contexts, Language, Culture & Curriculum, 28, 1, pp. 25-40, (2015); VanTassel-Baska J., A case for the teaching of Latin to the verbally talented, Roeper Review, 9, pp. 159-161, (1987); VanTassel-Baska J., Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners., (2003); VanTassel-Baska J., Serving gifted learners beyond the traditional classroom: A guide to alternative programs and services., (2007); VanTassel-Baska J., Bass G.M., Ries R.R., Poland D.L., Avery L.D., A national pilot study of science curriculum effectiveness for high ability students, Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, pp. 200-211, (1998); VanTassel-Baska J., Johnson D.T., Hughes C.E., Boyce L.N., A study of the language arts curriculum effectiveness with gifted learners, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, pp. 461-480, (1996); VanTassel-Baska J., MacFarlane B., Baska A., NAGC Select: Second language learning.; VanTassel-Baska J., Zuo L., Avery L.D., Little C.A., A curriculum study of gifted student learning in the language arts, Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, pp. 30-44, (2002); Worley B., Talent development in the performing arts: Teacher characteristics, behaviors, and classroom practices, (2006); Yorke M., Longden B., The first year experience of higher education in the UK., (2008); Yiiksel H.G., Becoming a teacher: Tracing changes in pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ sense of efficacy, South African Journal of Education, 34, 3, pp. 1-8, (2014); Zehr M.A., NRC sees deficit in federal approach to foreign languages, Education Week., (2007); Zhang F., Yongbing L., A study of secondary school English teach-ers’beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China, Language Teaching Research, 18, pp. 187-204, (2014)
Taylor and Francis
Book chapter
Scopus