CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
A critical, analytical framework for the digital machine
Tác giả
Hall C.; Chown E.; Nascimento F.
Năm xuất bản
2021
Source title
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1080/03080188.2020.1865659
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The Faculty of Digital and Computational Studies (DCS) at Bowdoin College proposes a critical, analytical framework, referred to as the ‘4As,’ as an interdisciplinary means to interpret, evaluate, and create the data, operations, and devices of computing across all domains of knowledge production. Following other disciplines that have developed in symbiotic relationships to one another, DCS puts computation in conversation with fields from across the arts, humanities, physical, and social sciences. Our foundational premise is the bidirectional influence between these disciplines and digital artifacts and computation. The 4As (artifact, architecture, abstraction, and agency) benefit from both the scepticism of the liberal arts in the face of ubiquitous digital processes and the analytical opening for examining questions pertaining to creative and imaginative alternatives to the digital and computational status quo. We provide an ultra-contemporary case study to demonstrate the framework in use. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Từ khóa
4As; Abstraction; analytical framework; computation; computational social sciences; digital humanities; epistemology; liberal arts
Tài liệu tham khảo
(2020); Alexander B., Frost Davis R., Should Liberal Arts Campuses Do Digital Humanities?, Debates in the Digital Humanities, pp. 368-389, (2012); Alkhatib A., (2020); Amrute S., (2019); Barbieri C., Darnis J.-P., pp. 1-6, (2020); Benjamin R., Race After Technology, (2019); Blei D., Carin L., Dunson D., Probabilistic Topic Models, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, (2010); Christie M., Words, Ontologies and Aboriginal Databases, Media International Australia, 116, 1, pp. 52-63, (2005); Chun W., Pattern Discrimination, (2018); D'Ignazio C., Klein L.F., Data Feminism, (2020); Downey G., Memory Practices in the Sciences. By Geoffrey C. Bowker (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 2005) 312 Pp. $34.95, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 38, 1, pp. 99-101, (2007); Drucker J., Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5, 1, pp. 1-21, (2011); Duarte M.E., Network Sovereignty: Building the Internet Across Indian Country, (2017); (2020); Elish M.C., Boyd D., Situating Methods in the Magic of big Data and AI, Communication Monographs, 85, 1, pp. 57-80, (2018); Gitelman L., Jackson V., Introduction: Raw Data Is an Oxymoron, Raw Data Is an Oxymoron, pp. 1-15, (2013); (2020); Gruber J., (2020); Huhtamo E., Parikka J., Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, (2011); Kaplan D.M., Ricoeur’s Critical Theory, (2003); Kramer J., Is Abstraction the Key to Computing?, Communications of the ACM, 50, 4, pp. 36-42, (2007); Latour B., On Technical Mediation, Common Knowledge, 3, 2, pp. 29-64, (1994); Latour B., Reassembling the Social–An Introduction to Actor Network Theory, (2005); Liddell H.G., Scott R., (1940); Mauro A., Digital Liberal Arts and Project-Based Pedagogies, Doing Digital Humanities, pp. 373-383, (2016); McCall M.K., Skutsch M.M., Honey-Roses J., Surveillance in the COVID-19 Normal: Tracking, Tracing, and Snooping–TradeOffs in Safety and Autonomy in the E-City, International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10, 2, pp. 27-44, (2021); McCarty W., Modeling: A Study in Words and Meanings, A Companion to Digital Humanities, pp. 254-270, (2004); McIlwain C.D., Black Software: The Internet and Racial Justice, from the AfroNet to Black Lives Matter, (2019); McPherson T., Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? Or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation, Debates in Digital Humanities 2012, pp. 139-160, (2012); Morley J., Cowls J., Taddeo M., Floridi L., (2020); Noble S.U., Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, (2018); O'Neill P.H., (2020); Raposo V.L., Can China’s ‘Standard of Care’ for COVID-19 Be Replicated in Europe?, Journal of Medical Ethics, 46, pp. 451-454, (2020); Schneier B., (2020); Selbst A.D., Boyd D., Friedler S., Venkatasubramanian S., Vertesi J., (2019); Sinclair S., Rockwell G., (2016); Thompson S.A., Warzel C., (2019); Tufekci Z., Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, (2017); Wing J.M., Computational Thinking and Thinking About Computing, Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 366, 1881, pp. 3717-3725, (2008); Wnuk A., Oleksy T., Maison D., The Acceptance of Covid-19 Tracking Technologies: The Role of Perceived Threat, Lack of Control, and Ideological Beliefs, PLoS ONE, 15, 9, (2020)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus