CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The Effect of a Pedagogical STEAM Model on Students’ Project Competence and Learning Motivation
Tác giả
Lin C.-L.; Tsai C.-Y.
Năm xuất bản
2021
Source title
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Số trích dẫn
15
DOI
10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The development of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Liberal Arts, and Mathematics) curricula has emerged in the past decade. A pedagogical STEAM (Scaffolding, Tutoring, Engaging, Argumentation, and Modeling) model was proposed in this study to implement interdisciplinary STEAM curricula. The effects of this model on students’ project competence and learning motivation were evaluated. A quasi-experimental design was adopted in the study. One hundred fourteen participants were recruited from a high school in southern Taiwan. There were 57 students in the experimental group (27 males; 30 females) and 57 in the comparison group (35 males; 22 females). The results revealed that the implementation of the pedagogical STEAM model was able to enhance the project competence and learning motivation of the students in the experimental group. Qualitative data from student interviews also revealed that the students had positive perceptions of the model. The main implication of this study is that the pedagogical STEAM model has the potential to be used as a teaching guide for the high school interdisciplinary curricula. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
Từ khóa
Motivation; Pedagogical STEAM model; Project competence; Project-based learning; STEAM
Tài liệu tham khảo
Al Salami M., Makela C., Miranda M., Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching, International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27, 1, pp. 63-88, (2017); Bandura A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, (1997); Chalmers C., Carter M., Cooper T., Nason R., Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 1, pp. 25-43, (2017); Chen C.S., Lin J.W., A practical action research study of the impact of maker-centered STEM-PjBL on a rural middle school in Taiwan, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, pp. 85-108, (2019); Chien Y.H., Chu P.Y., The different learning outcomes of high school and college students on a 3D-Printing STEAM engineering design curriculum, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 6, pp. 1047-1064, (2018); Chu H.E., Martin S.N., Park J., A theoretical framework for developing an intercultural STEAM program for Australian and Korean students to enhance science teaching and learning, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, pp. 1251-1266, (2019); Cohen J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (1988); Fredricks J.A., Hofkens T., Wang M.-T., Mortenson E., Scott P., Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 2, pp. 271-298, (2018); Gardner M., Tillotson J.W., Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogicalal innovation within a public middle school context, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 7, pp. 1283-1300, (2019); Geitz G., Brinke D.J.-T., Kirschner P.A., Changing learning behaviour: Self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education, International Journal of Educational Research, 75, pp. 146-158, (2016); Guzey S.S., Harwell M., Moreno M., Peralta Y., Moore T.J., The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 2, pp. 207-222, (2017); Han S., Capraro R., Capraro M., How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affect high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 5, pp. 1089-1113, (2015); Hoeg D.G., Bencze J.L., Values underpinning STEM education in the USA: An analysis of the Next Generation Science Standards, Science Education, 101, 2, pp. 278-301, (2017); Kim P.W., The Wheel Model of STEAM education based on traditional Korean scientific contents, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12, 9, pp. 2353-2371, (2016); Korner M., Hopf M., Cross-age peer tutoring in physics: Tutors, tutees, and achievement in electricity, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 5, pp. 1039-1063, (2015); Kuo H.-C., Tseng Y.-C., Yang Y.-T.C., Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, pp. 1-10, (2019); Lee C.B., Jonassen D., Teo T., The role of model building in problem solving and conceptual change, Interactive Learning Environments, 19, 3, pp. 247-265, (2011); Lin C.L., The development of an instrument to measure the project competences of college students in online project-based learning, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 1, pp. 57-69, (2018); Lou S.-J., Shih R.-C., Diez C., Tseng K.-H., The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, pp. 195-215, (2011); Maltese A.V., Tai R.H., Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students, Science Education, 95, 5, pp. 877-907, (2011); Manneh I.A., Rundgren C.-J., Hamza K.M., Eriksson L., Tutor-student interaction in undergraduate chemistry: A case of learning to make relevant distinctions of molecular structures for determining oxidation states of atoms, International Journal of Science Education, 40, 16, pp. 2023-2043, (2018); Master A., Cheryan S., Moscatelli A., Meltzoff A.N., Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, pp. 92-106, (2017); Meluso A., Zheng M., Spires H.A., Lester J., Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning, Computers & Education, 59, 2, pp. 497-504, (2012); Developing a National STEM Workforce Strategy: A Workshop Summary, (2016); Newhouse C.P., STEM the boredom: Engage students in the Australian curriculum using ICT with problem-based learning and assessment, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 1, pp. 44-57, (2017); Roehrig G.H., Moore T.J., Wang H.-H., Park M.S., Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration, School Science and Mathematics, 112, 1, pp. 31-44, (2012); Seman L.O., Hausmann R., Bezerra E.A., On the students' perceptions of the knowledge formation when submitted to a project-based learning environment using web applications, Computers & Education, 117, pp. 16-30, (2018); Sengupta P., Clark D., Playing modeling games in the science classroom: The case for disciplinary integration, Educational Technology, 56, 3, pp. 16-22, (2016); Smith E., White P., Where do all the STEM graduates Go? Higher education, the labour market and career trajectories in the UK, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 1, pp. 26-40, (2019); Shien P.P., Tsai C.Y., Impact of a Scientist-Teacher Collaborative Model on students, teachers, and scientists, International Journal of Science Education, 37, 13, pp. 2147-2169, (2015); So W.W.M., Zhan Y., Chow S.C.F., Leung C.F., Analysis of STEM activities in primary students’ science projects in an informal learning environment, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 6, pp. 1003-1023, (2018); Thuneberg H.M., Salmi H.S., Bogner F.X., How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, pp. 153-160, (2018); Tsai C.Y., The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students’ scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes, Computers & Education, 116, pp. 14-27, (2018); Tuan H.-L., Chin C.-C., Shieh S.-H., The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning, International Journal of Science Education, 27, 6, pp. 639-654, (2005); Vennix J., den Brok P., Taconis R., Do outreach activities in secondary STEM education motivate students and improve their attitudes towards STEM?, International Journal of Science Education, 40, 11, pp. 1263-1283, (2018); Wells J.G., PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: Conceptual and pedagogicalal framework for classroom implementation, Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75, 6, pp. 12-19, (2016); Zhang L., VanLehn K., Girard S., Burleson W., Chavez-Echeagaray M.E., Gonzalez-Sanchez J., Hidalgo-Pontet Y., Evaluation of a meta-tutor for constructing models of dynamic systems, Computers & Education, 75, pp. 196-217, (2014)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus