CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The promise of Bildung—or ‘a world of one's own’
Tác giả
Miller A.
Năm xuất bản
2021
Source title
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Số trích dẫn
5
DOI
10.1111/1467-9752.12528
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
To many philosophers of education who are dissatisfied with the current value-neutral goal-driven technocratic curriculum, the idea of Bildung—which I conceive here in the neo-humanist form associated with Wilhelm von Humboldt—holds great appeal. It seems to promise, on the one hand, a richer, culturally situated form of rationality, without the strong elements of cultural reproduction inherent in traditional liberal arts curricula; and on the other hand, a powerful means of critique, which makes it eminently suited to our ‘postmodern’ condition. However, much of the appeal of Bildung in its Humboldtian form only arises from its having discarded the most valuable elements in other traditions: initiation into a cultural tradition, vocational preparation and the cultivation of practical judgement. Moreover, it is destined to fail by its own standards because it has little relevance to most pupils. Bildung so conceived does not designate a universal educational ideal; rather, the outlook of a certain human type—the philosopher, scholar, artist or intellectual—whose introspective nature leads them to seek fulfilment in the life of the mind, in theoretical abstraction and aesthetic experience. © 2020 The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
Từ khóa
Bildung; Humboldt; liberal education; paideia; rational autonomy; vocational education
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adorno T.W., Horkheimer M., Dialectic of enlightenment, (1997); Bakhurst D., The formation of reason, (2011); Bakhurst D., Practice, sensibility and moral education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52, 4, pp. 677-694, (2018); Benner D., Wilhelm von Humboldts Bildungstheorie, (1990); Berglar P., Wilhelm von Humboldt, (1970); Bruford W.H., The German tradition of self-cultivation, (1975); Burrow J.W., Introduction to the limits of state action, (1969); Curtis S.J., Boultwood M.E.A., A short history of educational ideas, (1965); Derry J., From disembodied intellect to cultivated rationality, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50, 1, pp. 117-129, (2016); Dewey J., Democracy and education, (1966); Gadamer H.-G., Truth and method, (2003); Giacomoni P., Paper presented at the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Paideia as Bildung in Germany in the age of enlightenment, (1988); Gur-Ze'ev I., Bildung and critical theory in the face of postmodern education, Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity, pp. 75-92, (2003); Philosophy of Right, (1967); Hirst P.H., Knowledge and the curriculum, (1974); Hotam Y., Bildung: liberal education and its devout origins’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53, 4, pp. 619-632, (2019); Humboldt W.V., Der Königsberger und der litauischer schulplan, Wilhelm von Humboldt Werke in Fünf Bänden, IV, pp. 168-195, (1964); Humboldt W.V., The limits of state action, (1969); Humboldt W.V., Theory of Bildung, Teaching as a reflective practice: the German Didaktik tradition, (2015); Jaeger W., Paideia: the ideals of greek culture, 1, (1939); Jessop S., Education for citizenship and ‘ethical life’: an exploration of the Hegelian concepts of Bildung and Sittlichkeit, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46, 2, pp. 287-302, (2012); Kerschensteiner G., The idea of the industrial school, (1913); Kimball B.A., Orators and philosophers: a history of the idea of liberal education, (1995); Lovlie L., The promise of Bildung, Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity, (2003); Lovlie L., Mortensen K.P., Nordenbo S.E., Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity, (2003); Lovlie L., Standish P., Introduction: Bildung and the idea of a liberal education, Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity, pp. 1-24, (2003); Luth C., On Wilhelm von Humboldt's theory of Bildung, Teaching as a reflective practice: the German Didaktik tradition, (2015); MacIntyre A., Whose justice? Which rationality?, (1988); Marcuse H., One-dimensional man, (1986); Marrou H.I., A history of education in antiquity, (1964); McDowell J., Mind and world, (1996); Miller A., Rhetoric, Paideia and the old idea of a liberal education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41, 2, pp. 183-206, (2007); Miller A., A new vision of liberal education: the good of the unexamined life, (2016); Newman J.H., The idea of a university, (1982); Nordenbo S.E., Bildung and the thinking of Bildung, Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity, pp. 25-36, (2003); Oakeshott M., The voice of liberal learning, (2001); Reichenbach R., On irritation and transformation: A-teleological Bildung and its significance for the democratic form of living, Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity, pp. 93-103, (2003); Spranger E., Wilhelm von Humboldt und die humanitätsidee, (1909); Standish P., The disenchantment of education and the re-enchantment of the world, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50, 1, pp. 98-116, (2016); Sydow A.V., Wilhelm und Karoline von Humboldt in ihren Briefen, III, (1910); Sydow A.V., Wilhelm und Karoline von Humboldt in ihren Briefen, IV, (1910); Sydow A.V., Wilhelm und Karoline von Humboldt in ihren Briefen, V, (1910); Thompson C., The non-transparency of the self and the ethical value of Bildung, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39, 3, pp. 519-533, (2005); Weniger E., Didaktik as a theory of education, Teaching as a reflective practice: the German Didaktik tradition, pp. 111-126, (2015); Winch C., Education, work and social capital, (2000); Winch C., Dimensions of expertise: a conceptual exploration of vocational knowledge, (2010)
Nơi xuất bản
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus