CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Lesbian, feminist, TERF: a queer attack on feminist studies

Tác giả

Thomsen C.; Essig L.

Năm xuất bản

2021

Source title

Journal of Lesbian Studies

Số trích dẫn

2

DOI

10.1080/10894160.2021.1950270

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85111630180&doi=10.1080%2f10894160.2021.1950270&partnerID=40&md5=808aab98186d78d775850390c47b72b6

Tóm tắt

While much has been said about the diversity industry and about transexclusionary radical feminists (TERFs), little has examined their relationship to one another or to academic feminist, queer, and trans studies. This article considers a “queer attack on feminist studies” at our small liberal arts college as a case study for thinking through these relations. A handful of students and diversity staff termed feminist studies faculty TERFs not because of any actual transphobic behavior, but because of our work to question gender systems and ideologies. By examining how some students and diversity office staff alike mobilized the TERF, as well as the ideologies that allow for slippages among the terms “lesbian,” “feminist,” and “TERF,” we outline how the lesbian and the feminist are in danger of becoming permanently reactionary figures. In so doing, we reflect on the relationship between performing diversity work and policing academic studies of gender and sexuality, ultimately arguing that the mobilization of the TERF can function both to further extend the work of the diversity industry and also to call into question academic feminist, queer, and trans studies. © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Từ khóa

diversity industry; feminist studies; lesbian feminist; moral panic; TERF

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmed S., A phenomenology of whiteness, Feminist Theory, 8, 2, pp. 149-168, (2007); Ahmed S., Living a feminist life, (2017); Briggs L., Activisms and epistemologies: Problems for transnationalisms, Social Text, 26, 4, pp. 79-95, (2008); Butler J., Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity, (1990); Chen S., The equity-diversity-inclusion industrial complex gets a makeover, (2020); (1973); Cohen C., Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics?, Glq: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 3, 4, pp. 437-465, (1997); Cohen S., Folk devils and moral panics, (2011); Edelman L., No future, (2004); Eng D., Puar J., Introduction: Left of queer, Social Text, 38, 4, pp. 1-23, (2020); (2012); Ferber A., (2020); (2013); Gardner A., A complete breakdown of the J.K. Rowling transgender comments controversy, (2020); Hemmings C., Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory, (2010); Mitchell G., Evangelical ecstasy meets feminist fury: Sex trafficking, moral panics, and homonationalism during global sporting events, Glq: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 22, 3, pp. 325-357, (2016); Nash J., Re-thinking intersectionality, Feminist Review, 89, 1, pp. 1-15, (2008); Nash J., Black feminism reimagined, (2019); Newkirk P., Diversity, Inc.: The failed promise of a billion-dollar business, (2019); Puar J., Terrorist assemblages, (2007); Raymond J., The trans sexual empire: The making of the she-male, (1979); Rubin G., Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality, pp. 143-178, (2006); Scott J., The evidence of experience, Critical Inquiry, 17, 4, pp. 773-797, (1991); Smythe V., I’m credited with having coined the word ‘Terf.’; Here’s how it happened, (2018); Soderling S., Thomsen C., White M., Critical mass, precarious value? Reflections on the gender, women’s, and feminist studies Ph.D. in Austere Times, Feminist Studies, 44, 2, pp. 229-251, (2018); Solanas V., Scum manifesto, (1967); Sullivan M., Kill daddy: Reproduction, futurity, and the survival of the radical feminist, WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44, 1-2, pp. 268-282, (2016); Taiwo O., Being-in-the-room privilege: Elite capture and epistemic deference, The Philosopher, 108, 4, (2020); Tiffany K., (2020); Tompkins K.W., (2016); Thomsen C., Finley J., On intersectionality: A review essay, Hypatia, 34, 1, pp. 155-160, (2019); Weed E., Schor N., Feminism meets queer theory, (1997); Weigman R., Object lessons, (2012)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus