CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
A Resource-Efficient Modular Course Design for Co-Teaching Integrated Sustainability in Higher Education: Developing the Next Generation of Entrepreneurial Leaders
Tác giả
Carey J.C.; Beitelspacher L.S.; Tosti-Kharas J.; Swanson E.
Năm xuất bản
2021
Source title
Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy
Số trích dẫn
6
DOI
10.1177/2515127420969967
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Society faces mounting pressures related to economic growth, social injustice, and environmental degradation. Building upon scholarly consensus regarding the necessity of multidisciplinary approaches to address such complex problems, the entrepreneurship classroom, broadly defined, can be a learning laboratory to integrate across disciplines, encouraging more impactful opportunity identification for students looking to create social, environmental, and economically inclusive value. We examined recent exit survey data from graduating seniors at a small, private business college in the US that emphasizes entrepreneurship, finding large gaps in skills and knowledge related to ethics and creative problem solving – both of which are key competencies central to meeting the challenges of building a more sustainable world. To address these identified needs, we developed a co-taught course focused on sustainability and consumerism across liberal arts, physical science, and business disciplines. We present our course material in the context of five key competencies related to teaching sustainability in higher education, and review the strengths and drawbacks of this approach for schools looking to implement a similar design. In a time of economic uncertainty in higher education, our model may be useful for other schools looking to integrate entrepreneurship across disciplines—with little added expense to the institution. © The Author(s) 2020.
Từ khóa
co-teaching; consumerism; multidisciplinary; pedagogy; sustainability
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bales K., Disposable people: New slavery in the global economy, (2012); Bales K., Blood and earth: Modern slavery, ecocide, and the secret to saving the world, (2016); Beitelspacher L., Rodgers V.L., Integrating corporate social responsibility awareness into a retail management course, Journal of Marketing Education, 40, 1, pp. 66-75, (2018); Byers T., Seelig T., Sheppard S., Weilerstein P., Its role in engineering education, The Bridge, 43, 2, (2013); Camillus J.C., Strategy as a wicked problem, Harvard Business Review, 86, 5, (2008); Crane A., Modern slavery as a management practice: Exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation, Academy of Management Review, 38, 1, pp. 49-69, (2013); Crowley K., Head B.W., The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: Revisiting Rittel and Weber, Policy Sciences, 50, 4, pp. 539-547, (2017); Curran M.A., Environmental life-cycle assessment, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1, 3, (1996); Fernald L.W., Solomon G.T., Tarabishy A., A new paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership, Southern Business Review, 30, 2, pp. 1-10, (2005); Fisher R.J., Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 2, (1993); Fuchs D.A., Lorek S., Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures, Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 3, pp. 261-288, (2005); Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N.M.P., Hultink E.J., The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, pp. 757-768, (2017); George B., Using transformational learning theory to develop a course in sustainable entrepreneurship, Evolving entrepreneurial education: Innovation in the Babson classroom, pp. 283-304, (2015); Gibbs D., O'Neill K., Green entrepreneurship: building a green economy?—Evidence from the UK, Social and Sustainable Enterprise: Changing the Nature of Business, 2, pp. 75-96, (2012); Greenberg D.N., Deets S., Erzurumlu S., Hunt J., Manwaring M., Rodgers V., Swanson E., Signing to living PRME: Learning from a journey towards responsible management education, The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 2, pp. 205-218, (2017); Greenberg D., McKone-Sweet K., Wilson H.J., (2011); Hitt M.A., Beamish P.W., Jackson S.E., Mathieu J.E., Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 6, pp. 1385-1399, (2007); Hoffman A.J., Haigh N., Positive deviance for a sustainable world: Linking sustainability and positive organizational scholarship, (2011); Holley K.A., Special issue: Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education, ASHE Higher Education Report, 35, 2, pp. 1-131, (2009); Howlett C., Ferreira J.-A., Blomfield J., Teaching sustainable development in higher education, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17, 3, pp. 305-321, (2016); Summary for Policymakers, Global Warming of 1.5°C, (2018); Isaksen S.G., Treffinger D.J., Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 2, pp. 75-101, (2004); Kara S., (2017); Kozlowski A., Bardecki M., Searcy C., Environmental impacts in the fashion industry: A life-cycle and stakeholder framework, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 45, pp. 17-36, (2012); Landman T., Larizza M., Inequality and human rights: Who controls what, when, and how, International Studies Quarterly, 53, 3, pp. 715-736, (2009); Lester T., Rodgers V.L., Teaching a cross-disciplinary environmental science, policy, and culture course on Costa Rica’s ecotourism to business students, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2, 3, pp. 234-238, (2012); Lewis H., Dwyer P., Hodkindson S., Waite L., Precarious lives: Forced labor, exploitation, and asylum, (2015); McDonough W., Braungart M., Anastas P.T., Zimmerman J.B., Peer reviewed: Applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-Cradle design, Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 23, pp. 434A-441A, (2003); McGrath R.G., MacMillan I.C., The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty, 284, (2000); McGregor S.L.T., Consumerism, the common good, and the human condition, Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 99, 3, pp. 15-22, (2007); Meadows D.H., Thinking in systems: A primer, (2008); Meyerson D., Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work, (2003); Moyn S., Not enough: Human rights in an unequal world, (2018); Murawski W.W., Dieker L., 50 ways to keep your co-teacher, Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 4, pp. 40-48, (2008); Murillo D., Lozano J.M., SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 3, pp. 227-240, (2006); Neck H.M., Murray C.P., Entrepreneurship: the practice & mindset, (2020); Nederhof A.J., Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review, European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 3, pp. 263-280, (1985); Nichols S., (1987); Nidumolu R., Prahalad C.K., Rangaswami M.R., Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation, Harvard Business Review, 87, 9, pp. 56-64, (2009); Parnes S.J., Creative Behavior Guidebook, (1967); Parrish B.D., Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design, Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 5, pp. 510-523, (2010); Porter T., Cordoba J., Three views of systems theories and their implications for sustainability education, Journal of Management Education, 33, 3, pp. 323-347, (2009); Rifkin J., The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis, (2009); Rittel H.W., Webber M.M., Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences, 4, 2, pp. 155-169, (1973); Robinson B., Schaible R.M., Collaborative teaching, College Teaching, 43, 2, pp. 57-59, (1995); Scheinedgar H., Organizational culture and leadership., 2, (2010); Seemiller C., Grace M., (2016); Steiner S.D., Brock D.D., Pittz T.G., Liguori E., Multi-disciplinary involvement in social entrepreneurship education: A uniquely threaded ecosystem, Journal of Ethics & Entrepreneurship, 8, 1, pp. 73-91, (2018); Surie G., Ashley A., Integrating pragmatism and ethics in entrepreneurial leadership for sustainable value creation, Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 1, pp. 235-246, (2008); Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems, System Dynamics Review: The Journal of The System Dynamics Society, 23, 2-3, pp. 285-311, (2007); Timmons J.A., Spinelli S., New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century, (2004); Organization OR Environment? Disentangling employees’ rationales behind organizational citizenship behavior toward the environment, Organization & Environment, 30, 3, pp. 187-210, (2017); Trentmann F., Multiple spaces of consumption: Some historical perspectives, pp. 55-70, (2016); Trudel R., Argo J.J., Meng M.D., Meng. The recycled self: Consumers’ disposal decisions of identity-linked products, Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 2, pp. 246-264, (2016); Twenge J.M., (2017); The heat is on taking stock of global climate ambition, (2019); Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, (2018); Vom Brocke J., Seidel S., Recker J., Green business process management: Towards the sustainable enterprise, (2012); 53, pp. 5-30, (2015); Warburton K., Deep learning and education for sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4, 1, pp. 44-56, (2003); Wiek A., Withycombe L., Redman C.L., Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development, Sustainability Science, 6, 2, pp. 203-218, (2011); Worsham E.L., Reflections and insights on teaching social entrepreneurship: an interview with Greg Dees, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 3, pp. 442-452, (2012)
Nơi xuất bản
SAGE Publications Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus