CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Majorism: Neoliberalism in Student Culture
Tác giả
Carrigan C.; Bardini M.
Năm xuất bản
2021
Source title
Anthropology and Education Quarterly
Số trích dẫn
9
DOI
10.1111/aeq.12361
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Declining support for US higher education and the corporatization of this institution shape students’ experiences. This ethnography describes a campus culture stratified by an ideology called “majorism.” Majorism, a term particular to this study’s site, is the preferential treatment of science and technology over the Liberal Arts. By understanding majorism through the lived experiences of undergraduates, we can better understand what the US academy values, its purpose, and whom it does and does not serve. © 2021 by the American Anthropological Association
Từ khóa
Democratic Values; Educational Anthropology; Engineering; Higher Education; Liberal Arts; Neoliberalism; STS
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barth J.M., Guadagno R.E., Rice L., Eno C.A., Minney J.A., Untangling Life Goals and Occupational Stereotypes in Men’s and Women’s Career Interest, Sex Roles, 73, 11-12, pp. 502-518, (2015); Bauer H.H., Barriers against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS), Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 1, pp. 105-119, (1990); Bromell N., Summa Cum Avaritia, Harper’s, pp. 71-76, (2002); Brown W., Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution: Zone Books, (2015); Burack C., Franks S., Telling Stories about Engineering: Group Dynamics and Resistance to Diversity, National Women's Studies Association, 16, 1, pp. 79-95, (2004); Canaan J., Resisting the English Neoliberalising University: What Critical Pedagogy Can Offer, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, (2013); Canaan J., Shumar W., Structure and Agency in the Neoliberal University, (2008); Carrigan C.M., Yearning to Give Back: Searching for Social Purpose in Computer Science and Engineering, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017); Cech E.A., Ideological Wage Inequalities? The Technical/Social Dualism and the Gender Wage Gap in Engineering, Social Forces, 91, 4, pp. 1147-1182, (2013); Cech E.A., The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation, American Journal of Sociology, 119, 3, pp. 747-789, (2013); Cech E.A., Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39, 1, pp. 42-72, (2014); Cheryan S., Ziegler S.A., Montoya A.K., Jiang L., Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced Than Others?, Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1, pp. 1-35, (2016); Coetzee J.M., Elizabeth Costello, (2003); Cohen P., A Rising Call to Promote STEM Education and Cut Liberal Arts Funding, The New York Times, (2016); Diekman A.B., Brown E.R., Johnston A.M., Clark E.K., Seeking Congruity between Goals and Roles: A New Look at Why Women Opt out of STEM Careers, Psychological Science, 21, 8, pp. 1051-1057, (2010); Duggan L., The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy, (2003); Faulkner W., Dualism, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering, Social Studies of Science, 30, 5, pp. 759-792, (2000); Faulkner W., The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for "Making Gender Stick" to Engineers, Science, Technology and Human Values, 25, 1, pp. 87-119, (2000); Franklin S., Science as Culture, Cultures of Science, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, pp. 163-184, (1995); Fricker M., Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, (2007); Ganti T., Neoliberalism, Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, pp. 89-104, (2014); Giroux H., Neoliberalism, Corporate Culture, and the Promise of Higher Education: The University as a Democratic Public Sphere, Harvard Educational Review, 72, 4, pp. 425-464, (2002); Giroux H.A., Bare Pedagogy and the Scourge of Neoliberalism: Rethinking Higher Education as a Democratic Public Sphere, Educational Forum, 74, 3, pp. 184-196, (2010); Gramsci A., Prison Notebooks, (1971); Harvey D., A Brief History of Neoliberalism, (2005); Holland D.C., Eisenhart M.A., Educated in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture, (1990); Hyatt S., Shear B., Wright S., Processes of social transformation: An anthropology of English higher education policy, Learning Under Neoliberalism: Ethnographies of Governance in Higher Education, (2005); Kleinman D.L., Vallas S., Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the “Knowledge Worker”: The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States, Theory and Society, 30, 4, pp. 451-492, (2001); Lassiter L.E., Teacher's Corner: Doing Collaborative Ethnography. AnthroNotes, Spring, 10-14, AnthroNotes, Spring, pp. 10-14, (2004); Lassiter L.E., The New (Critical) Ethnography: On Feminist and Postmodern Approaches to Collaboration, The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography, (2005); Marginson S., Higher Education and the Common Good, Markets in Education, (2016); Marginson S., The Dream Is Over: The Crisis of Clark Kerr's California Idea of Higher Education, Markets in Education, (2016); Neiburg F., Guyer J.I., The real in the real economy, Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7, 3, pp. 261-279, (2017); Newfield C., Unmasking the Public University: The Forty-Year Assault on the Middle Class, (2008); Olssen M., Peters M.A., Neoliberalism Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism, Journal of Education Policy, 20, 3, pp. 313-345, (2007); Peters M.A., Bulut E., Cognitive capitalism, education, and digital labor, (2011); Posecznick A., Provoking Aspirations: Risk Management Through the Cultivation of Future Selves in College Recruitment, Policy Futures in Education, 13, 5, pp. 639-661, (2015); Richter D.M., Paretti M.C., Identifying Barriers to and Outcomes of Interdisciplinarity in the Engineering Classroom, European Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 1, pp. 29-45, (2009); Riley D., Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit, Engineering Studies, 9, 3, pp. 249-265, (2017); Roksa J., Levey T., What Can You Do With That Degree?: College Major and Occupational Status of College Graduates over Time, Social Forces, 89, 2, pp. 389-415, (2010); Ross A., Science wars, (1996); Scheper-Hughes N., Lock M.M., The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1, 1, pp. 6-41, (1987); Scott D.L., Rebellion J., How Higher Education in the US Was Destroyed in 5 Basic Steps, (2012); Seron C., Silbey S.S., Cech E., Rubineau B., Persistence is Cultural: Professional Socialization and the Reproduction of Sex Segregation, Work and Occupations, 43, 2, pp. 178-214, (2015); Shore C., Wright S., Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, pp. 557-575, (1999); Shumar W., College for Sale: A Critique of the Commodification of Higher Education, (1997); Shumar W., Making Strangers at Home: Anthropologists Studying Higher Education, Journal of Higher Education, 75, 1, pp. 23-41, (2004); Shumar W., Mir S., Cultural Anthropology Looks at Higher Education, A Companion to the Anthropology of Education, pp. 445-460, (2011); Simpson J.C., Segregated by Subject: Racial Differences in the Factors Influencing Academic Major between European Americans, Asian Americans, and African, Hispanic, and Native Americans, The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 1, pp. 63-100, (2001); Slaughter S., Leslie L.L., Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University, (1997); Slaughter S., Rhoades G., Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education, (2004); Thorkelson E., A Campus Fractured: Neoliberalization and the Clash of Academic Democracies in France, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 50, 1, pp. 97-113, (2019); Uricuoli B., The Experience of Neoliberal Education, (2018); Veteto J., Lockyer J., Applying Anthropology to What?, Tactical/ethical Decisions in an Age of Global Neoliberal Imperialism., 22, 1, pp. 357-367, (2015); Wright S., Shore C., Death of the Public University?: Uncertain Futures for Higher Education in the Knowledge Economy, (2017); Yang Y., Barth J.M., Gender Differences in STEM Undergraduates' Vocational Interests: People- Thing Orientation and Goal Affordances, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, pp. 65-75, (2015)
Nơi xuất bản
Wiley-Blackwell
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus