CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
FOSTERING QUALITY OF REFLECTION IN FIRST-YEAR HONOURS STUDENTS IN A BACHELOR ENGINEERING PROGRAM TECHNOLOGY, LIBERAL ARTS & SCIENCE
Tác giả
Wilhelm P.
Năm xuất bản
2021
Source title
Proceedings - SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This study focused on fostering the quality reflection displayed in semester self-evaluation reports (SERs) of First-year Honours Students in a Bachelor engineering program Technology, Liberal Arts and Science (ATLAS) of the University of Twente in the Netherlands. The underlying problem that inspired this study was that the quality of reflection was considered too low. In addition, there was unclarity in the program on to what was expected of students with respect to reflection. Twenty-nine participants, not previously exposed to academic training on reflection before, received a Reflection Guide on how to write written reflections in their SERs. Two online lectorials (interactive lectures) were provided to elaborate on the content of the guide and to address any questions of the students. Quality of reflection in the SERs was assessed using a standardized rubric and quality scores in the intervention group were compared with scores of the student cohort of the previous academic year (n = 33). Results showed that the intervention group reflected significantly on a higher level than the comparison group. © 2021 Proceedings - SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?. All Rights Reserved.
Từ khóa
Student reflection
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ash S.L., Clayton P.H., The articulated learning: An approach to reflection and assessment, Innovative Higher Education, 29, pp. 137-154, (2004); Gibbons M., The Self-directed learning Handbook: Challenging Adolescents Students to Excel, (2002); Goldberg D. E., Sommerville M., A whole new engineer, (2014); Gun B., Quality Self-reflection through Reflection Training, ELT Journal, 65, (2011); Kember D., McKay J., Sinclair K., Yuet Wong F.K., A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 4, pp. 369-379, (2008); Kori K., Pedaste M., Leijen A., Maeots M., Supporting reflection in technology-enhanced learning, Educational Research Review, 11, pp. 45-55, (2014); Rogers R. R., Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis, Innovative Higher Education, 26, 1, pp. 37-57, (2001); Russell T., Can reflective practice be taught?, Reflective Practice, 6, pp. 199-204, (2005); Saks S., Leijen A., Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the E-learning Context, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, pp. 190-198, (2014); Yost D. S., Sentner S. M., Forlenza-Bailey A., An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century, Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 1, (2000)
Nơi xuất bản
European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)
Hình thức xuất bản
Conference paper
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus