CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
A vindication of transnational democratic education–replies to Michael Festl, Martin Beckstein and Michael Geiss
Tác giả
Culp J.
Năm xuất bản
2020
Source title
Ethics and Global Politics
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1080/16544951.2020.1821531
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
In Democratic Education in a Globalized World (Routledge, 2019) I defend a discourse theory of global justice as the appropriate normative 11 I would like to thank the guest editors of the book symposium, Klaus Dingwerth and Simon Pistor, as well as David Tresilian and Sharman Levinson for valuable exchanges on this article. ground for conceiving educational justice and citizenship education under conditions of economic and political globalization. In addition, I articulate democratic conceptions of global educational justice and citizenship education that recognize a moral-political right to democratically adequate education and call for the creation of transnational democratic consciousness. Based on these conceptions I spell out school practices such as historically informed, cross-cultural learning within socially diverse settings that would contribute to realizing these conceptions. In this article I reply to liberal perfectionist, communitarian-conservative and empiricist-historical critiques of Democratic Education in a Globalized World from Michael Festl, Martin Beckstein and Michael Geiss, respectively. I emphasize the feasibility of injustice-reducing educational practices, I explain how a discourse theory of justice accommodates considerations of both the good and the right, and I justify why the grim record of past educational experience does not render pointless the pursuit of progressive aims through education. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Từ khóa
citizenship education; Educational justice; global democracy; global justice; liberal education
Tài liệu tham khảo
Beck U., Die Neuvermessung der Ungleichheit unter den Menschen, (2008); Beckstein M., Cosmopolitan Arrogance, Epistemic Modesty and Motivational Prerequisites for Solidarity, Ethics & Global Politics, (2020); Biesta G., Resisting the Seduction of the Global Education Measurement Industry: Notes on the Social Psychology of PISA, Ethics and Education, 10, pp. 155-174, (2016); Costa V., Rawls, Citizenship, and Education, (2011); Culp J., Global Justice and Development, (2014); Culp J., Democratic Education in A Globalized World. A Normative Theory, (2019); Culp J., Special Issue on Global Justice and Education, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 12/1: i-ii, (2019); Culp J., Zwarthoed D., Education and Migration, (2020); Dingwerth K., Global Democracy and the Democratic Minimum. Why a Procedural Account Is Insufficient, European Journal of International Relations, 20, 4, pp. 1124-1147, (2014); Easterly W., The White Man’s Burden. Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good, (2006); Ellerman D., Helping People Help Themselves, (2005); [On Behalf of Ständige Konferenz Der Kultusminister Der Länder in Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland and Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit Und Entwicklung], (2016); Engartner T., Ökonomisierung schulischer Bildung. Analysen und Alternativen, (2020); Evans M.L.A., MacDonald I.A., Weber N., Mapping the ‘Global Dimension’ of Citizenship Education in Canada: The Complex Interplay of Theory, Practice, and Context, Citizenship, Teaching and Learning, 52, 2, pp. 16-34, (2009); Festl M., Global Education and the Liberal Project, Ethics & Global Politics, (2020); Forst R., Contexts of Justice. Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism, (2002); Forst R., The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, (2012); Forst R., Justification and Critique, (2014); Freire P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed, (1970); Geiss M., What Can Be Achieved through Education at All?, Ethics & Global Politics, (2020); Gutmann A., Civic Education and Social Diversity, Ethics, 105, pp. 557-579, (1995); Habermas J., Between Facts and Norms–Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, (1996); Kant I., Education, (1803); Krastev I., Holmes S., The Light that Failed–A Reckoning, (2019); Mannion G., Biesta G., Priestley M., Ross H., The Global Dimension in Education and Education for Global Citizenship: Genealogy and Critique, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9, 3-4, pp. 443-456, (2011); Milanovic B., Global Inequality, (2016); Moyo D., Dead Aid. Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is Another Way for Africa, (2009); Nida-Rumelin J., Philosophie einer humanen Bildung, (2013); Nussbaum M., Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, (2010); Pogge T., World Poverty and Human Rights, (2002); Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, (1971); Sandel M., The Limits of Liberalism, (1982); Sandel M., Democracy’s Discontents. America in Search of a Public Philosophy, (1996); Straehle C., National and Cosmopolitan Solidarity, Contemporary Political Theory, 9-1, pp. 110-120, (2010); Williams M., Citizenship as Agency within Communities of Shared Fate, Unsettled Legitimacy. Political Community, Power, and Authority in the Global Era, pp. 33-52, (2009); Young I., Justice and the Politics of Difference, (1990); Ypi L., Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency, (2011)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus