Developing an effective Chinese-American telecollaborative learning program: an action research study
Luo H.; Gui M.
2021
Computer Assisted Language Learning
12
10.1080/09588221.2019.1633355
Despite the rapid development of telecollaboration in foreign language education, telecollaborative exchanges involving Chinese as the target language have not received sufficient attention. Adopting an action research approach, this study focuses on examining the student perceptions as well as the challenges of a carefully designed Chinese-American telecollaborative learning program involving Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) students at a small liberal arts college in the US and Chinese-speaking English majors at a large university in China. This study drew on a variety of data for analysis, including naturally occurring interaction data (i.e., Skype conversations, WeChat group discussion transcripts), students' weekly reflection journals, informal interviews with the students throughout the semester, end-of-program interviews, student responses to an end-of-semester questionnaire, and the teacher-researcher reflective journal. The results showed that this program was, in general, well received among the CFL students at the US college. The intermediate-level CFL students evaluated this program more positively than the elementary-level students. However, this program also faced many challenges, such as scheduling and technological issues with Skype conversations, target language proficiency gap, perceived irrelevance to Chinese proficiency development, heavy workload, lack of depth in WeChat group discussion, and the demanding role of the teacher-researcher. © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
action research; Chinese as a foreign language (CFL); online intercultural exchange; Telecollaboration; WeChat
Appel M.C., Tandem language learning by e-mail: Some basic principles and a case study. Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Occasional Paper 54, (1999); Avgousti M.I., Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 8, pp. 819-853, (2018); Belz J.A., Institutional and individual dimensions of translatlantic group work in network-based language teaching, ReCALL, 13, 2, pp. 129-147, (2001); Belz J.A., Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study, Language Learning & Technology, 6, 1, pp. 60-81, (2002); Belz J.A., Linguistic perspective on the development of intercultural communicative competence in telecollaboration, Language Learning & Technology, 7, pp. 68-117, (2003); Belz J.A., From the special editor, Language Learning & Technology, 7, 2, pp. 2-5, (2003); Belz J.A., Kinginger C., Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms, Language Learning, 53, 4, pp. 591-647, (2003); Belz J.A., Thorne S.L., Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, (2006); Brammerts H., Language learning in tandem using the Internet, Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, pp. 121-130, (1996); Chen D., Can language exchange help beginners develop Chinese proficiency?, Journal of Chinese Teaching and Research in the U.S, 12, pp. 1-11, (2017); Chun D.M., Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges, CALICO Journal, 28, 2, pp. 392-419, (2011); Chun D.M., Editor’s introduction, Cultura-inspired intercultural exchanges: Focus on Asian and Pacific languages, pp. xi-xx, (2014); Chun D.M., Language and culture learning in higher education via telecollaboration, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10, 1, pp. 5-21, (2015); Coghland D., Brannick T., Doing action research in your own organization, (2010); Constas M.A., Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures, American Educational Research Journal, 29, 2, pp. 253-266, (1992); Cziko G., Electronic tandem language learning (eTandem): A third approach to second language learning for the 21st century, CALICO Journal, 22, 1, pp. 25-39, (2004); Dooly M., Choosing the appropriate communication tools for an online exchange, Online intercultural exchange. An introduction for foreign language teachers, pp. 213-234, (2007); Dooly M., Understanding the many steps for effective collaborative language projects, Language Learning Journal, 36, 1, pp. 65-78, (2008); Dooly M., Teacher 2.0, Telecollaboration 2.0: Language and intercultural learning in the 21st century, pp. 277-304, (2010); Dooly M., Hauck M., Researching multimodal communicative competence in video and audio telecollaborative encounters, Researching online foreign language interaction and exchange, pp. 135-161, (2012); Dooly M., O'Dowd R., Researching online foreign language interaction and exchange: Theories, methods and challenges, (2012); Fuchs C., “Are you able to access this website at all?”–Team negotiations and macro-level challenges in telecollaboration, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 7, pp. 1152-1168, (2016); Guth S., Helm F., Telecollaboration 2.0. Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century, (2010); Guth S., Helm F., Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration, ELT Journal, 66, 1, pp. 42-52, (2011); Hauck M., Critical success factors in a TRIDEM exchange, ReCALL, 19, 2, pp. 202-223, (2007); Hauck M., Youngs B.L., Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 2, pp. 87-124, (2008); Helm F., Dooly M., Language Learning & Technology, 21, 1, pp. 166-185, (2017); Helm F., The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe, Language Learning & Technology, 19, 2, pp. 197-217, (2015); Helm F., Facilitated dialogue in online intercultural exchange, Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice, pp. 150-172, (2016); Jiang S., Wang H., Tschudi S., Intercultural learning on the web: Reflections on practice, Cultura-inspired intercultural exchanges: Focus on Asian and Pacific languages, pp. 121-137, (2014); Jin L., Erben T., Intercultural Learning via Instant Messenger Interaction, CALICO Journal, 24, 2, pp. 291-311, (2007); Kern R., Literacy and language teaching., (2000); Kern R., Technology as pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education, Modern Language Journal, 98, 1, pp. 340-357, (2014); Kern R., Warschauer M., Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, (2000); Kramsch C., Thorne S., Foreign language learning as global communicative practice, Language learning and teaching in the age of globalization, pp. 83-100, (2002); Lewis T., O'Dowd R., Online intercultural exchange and foreign language learning: A systematic review, Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice, pp. 21-68, (2016); Lincoln Y., Guba E., Naturalistic inquiry., (1985); Luo H., Yang C., Using WeChat in teaching L2 Chinese: An exploratory study, Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 7, 2, pp. 82-96, (2016); Luo H., Yang C., Twenty years of telecollaborative practice: Implications for teaching Chinese as a foreign language, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 5-6, pp. 546-571, (2018); Malinowski D., Kramsch C., The ambiguous world of heteroglossic computer mediated language learning, Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy, pp. 155-178, (2014); Merriam S.B., Qualitative research and case studies applications in education., (1998); Muller-Hartmann A., The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks, Language Learning & Technology, 4, 2, pp. 129-147, (2000); Muller-Hartmann A., The teacher role in telecollaboration: Setting up and managing exchanges, Online intercultural exchange. An introduction for foreign language teachers, pp. 167-192, (2007); Muller-Hartmann A., The classroom-based action research paradigm in telecollaboration, Research methods for online interaction and exchange, pp. 156-192, (2012); O'Dowd R., Understanding the “other side”: A qualitative analysis of intercultural learning in networked exchanges, Language Learning & Technology, 7, 2, pp. 118-144, (2003); O'Dowd R., Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange, ELT Journal, 61, 2, pp. 144-152, (2007); O'Dowd R., Intercultural communicative competence through telecollaboration, The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication, pp. 342-358, (2012); O'Dowd R., Emerging trends and new directions in telecollaborative learning, CALICO Journal, 33, 3, pp. 291-310, (2016); O'Dowd R., Eberbach K., Guides on the side? Tasks and challenges for teachers in telecollaborative projects, ReCALL, 16, 1, pp. 129-144, (2004); O'Dowd R., Ritter M., Understanding and working with “failed communication” in telecollaborative exchanges, CALICO Journal, 23, pp. 623-642, (2006); O'Dowd R., Ware P., Critical issues in telecollaborative task design, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, pp. 173-188, (2009); O'Rourke B., Models of telecollaboration (1): eTandem, Online intercultural exchange, pp. 41-61, (2007); Park M., An ecological perspective on intercultural telecollaborative learning between Korean learners of English and American Learners of Korean, (2014); Ryder L., Yamagata-Lynch L., Understanding tensions: Activity systems analysis of transpacific collaboration, CALICO Journal, 31, 2, pp. 201-220, (2014); Rubin J., The collaborative online international learning network, Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice, pp. 263-272, (2016); Schenker T., Intercultural competence and cultural learning through telecollaboration, CALICO Journal, 29, 3, pp. 449-470, (2012); Schwienhorst K., Virtual reality and learner autonomy in second language acquisition, (2000); St. John E., Cash D., Language learning via e-mail: Demonstrable success with German, Virtual connections, pp. 191-198, (1995); Strauss A., Corbin J., Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, (1998); Thorne S., Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research, Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, pp. 2-30, (2006); Tian J., Wang Y., Taking language learning outside the classroom: Learners’ perspectives of eTandem learning via Skype, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 3, pp. 181-197, (2010); Von der Emde S., Schneider J., Kotter M., Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs), Modern Language Journal, 85, 2, pp. 210-225, (2001); Wang D., Zou B., Xing M., Interactive learning between Chinese students learning English and English students learning Chinese on the platform of wiki, International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 3, pp. 70-85, (2011); Wang J., Berger C., Szilas N., Pedagogical design of an eTandem Chinese–French writing course, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18, 3, pp. 393-409, (2012); Wang J., Zou B., Wang D., Xing M., Students’ perception of a wiki platform and the impact of wiki engagement on intercultural communication, System, 41, 2, pp. 245-256, (2013); Wang L., Coleman J.A., A survey of Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education in China, ReCALL, 21, 1, pp. 113-129, (2009); Wang Y., Fang W.-C., Han J., Chen N.-S., Exploring the affordances of WeChat for facilitating teaching, social and cognitive presence in semi-synchronous language exchange, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 4, pp. 18-37, (2016); Wang Y., Tian J., Negotiation of meaning in multimodal Tandem Learning via Desktop Videoconferencing, International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 2, pp. 41-55, (2013); Wang-Szilas J., Berger C., Zhang L., eTandem language learning integrated in the curriculum: Reflection from students’ perspectives, European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, pp. 37-49, (2013); Ware P., ‘Missed’ communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration, Language Learning & Technology, 9, 2, pp. 64-89, (2005); Zhang S., Learning through a CMC-Based tandem project with native speakers: A descriptive Study of beginning CFL learners, Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 7, 2, pp. 58-81, (2016)
Routledge
Article
Scopus