CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Rewards and resistance: the importance of teaching women's and gender studies at a southern, comprehensive, liberal arts university

Tác giả

Millar K.

Năm xuất bản

2021

Source title

Gender and Education

Số trích dẫn

4

DOI

10.1080/09540253.2020.1722069

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078720201&doi=10.1080%2f09540253.2020.1722069&partnerID=40&md5=d40e605724dc3a0b16d12b1439e662c1

Tóm tắt

The discipline of women's and gender studies [WGS] often attracts criticism from the media, the public, and students. Few recent empirical studies focus on the experiences of faculty who teach WGS courses–particularly professors teaching in conservative areas. To address this gap in the literature, I conducted 30 interviews with faculty who teach courses related to women, gender, and/or sexuality at a Southern, public, liberal arts university in the United States. Participants noted the importance and rewards of teaching WGS. However, only half of participants reported integrating WGS content outside of gender-focused courses. This disparity between emphasising the importance of WGS and refraining from teaching gendered content outside of ‘special topics’ courses is likely due to professors aiming to avoid conflict and maintain credibility in the classroom and feeling sceptical of institutional support. My findings have broader implications that call for institutional change regarding support for professors and WGS. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Từ khóa

feminist pedagogy; resistance; Women’s and gender studies

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmed S., Living a Feminist Life, (2017); Allamark P., Boote J., Chambers E., Clarke A., McDonnell A., Thompson A., Tod A.M., Ethical Issues in the Use of In-Depth Interviews: Literature Review and Discussion, Research Ethics Review, 5, 2, pp. 46-54, (2009); Berheide C.W., Segal M.T., Teaching Sex and Gender: A Decade of Experience, Teaching Sociology, 12, 3, pp. 267-283, (1985); Bird E., The Sexual Politics of Introducing Women’s Studies: Memories and Reflections from North America and the United Kingdom 1965-1995, Gender and Education, 16, 1, pp. 51-64, (2004); Bohmer S., Briggs J.L., Teaching Privileged Students About Gender, Race, and Class Oppression, Teaching Sociology, 19, pp. 154-163, (1991); Bondy R., Nicholas J., Light T.P., Introduction: Feminist Pedagogy in Higher Education, Feminist Pedagogy in Higher Education: Critical Theory and Practice, pp. 1-9, (2015); Boxer M.J., For and about Women: The Theory and Practice of Women's Studies in the United States, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7, pp. 661-695, (1982); Briggs L., Whither Feminism in Higher Education in the Current Crisis?, Feminist Studies, 39, 2, pp. 502-506, (2013); Briskin L., Activist Feminist Pedagogies: Privileging Agency in Troubled Times, Feminist Pedagogy in Higher Education: Critical Theory and Practice, pp. 57-86, (2015); Brown W., The Impossibility of Women’s Studies, Women’s Studies on the Edge, pp. 17-39, (2008); Burke P.J., Difference in Higher Education Pedagogies: Gender, Emotion and Shame, Gender and Education, 29, 4, pp. 430-444, (2017); Crabtree R.D., Sapp D.A., Theoretical, Political, and Pedagogical Challenges in the Feminist Classroom: Our Struggles to Walk the Walk, College Teaching, 51, 4, pp. 131-140, (2003); Davis N.J., Teaching about Inequality: Student Resistance, Paralysis and Rage, Teaching Sociology, 20, 3, pp. 232-238, (1992); Dean J., The Guardian, (2011); Deay A., Stitzel J., Reshaping the Introductory Women’s Studies Course: Dealing Upfront with Anger, Resistance, and Reality, Feminist Teacher, 6, pp. 29-33, (1991); (2018); De Santis C., Serafini T., Classroom to Community: Reflections on Experiential Learning and Socially Just Citizenship, Feminist Pedagogy in Higher Education: Critical Theory and Practice, pp. 87-112, (2015); Diaz K., Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy; Freire P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed, (1970); Grahame K.M., Contesting Diversity in the Academy: Resistance to Women of Color Teaching Race, Class, and Gender, Race, Gender, and Class, 11, 3, pp. 54-73, (2004); Hammons-Bryner S., Teaching Gender Studies in a Small Southern College, Feminist Teacher, 10, 2, pp. 65-70, (1996); Hartung B., Selective Rejection: How Students Perceive Women’s Studies Teachers, NWSA Journal, 2, 2, pp. 254-263, (1990); Higgins K., ‘Making It Your own World’: Women's Studies and Freire, Women's Studies International Forum, 5, 1, pp. 87-98, (1982); hooks B., Toward a Revolutionary Feminist Pedagogy, Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black, pp. 49-54, (1989); Houvouras S., Carter J.S., The F Word: College Students’ Definitions of a Feminist, Sociological Forum, 23, pp. 234-256, (2008); Hughes K., Liberation? Domestication? Freire and Feminism in the University, Convergence, 31, 1-2, pp. 137-146, (1998); Ito K., Reflections of an Oriental Southern Belle Teaching Sociology in Arkansas, Teaching Sociology, 20, pp. 170-172, (1992); Johnson M.L., Lez Be Honest: Queer Feelings About Women’s Studies at a Public Regional University in the Southeastern United States, Feminist Formations, 27, 3, pp. 237-260, (2015); Katz J., Swindell S., Farrow S., Effects of Participation in a First Women’s Studies Course on Collective Self-Esteem, Gender-Related Attitudes, and Emotional Well-Being, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 10, pp. 2179-2199, (2004); Kirkup G., Whitelegg E., The Legacy and Impact of Open University Women’s/Gender Studies: 30 Years On, Gender and Education, 25, 1, pp. 6-22, (2013); Kitch S.L., Claiming Success: From Adversity to Responsibility in Women’s Studies, National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 14, 1, pp. 160-181, (2002); Kuvalanka K.A., Goldberg A.E., Oswald R.F., Incorporating LGBTQ Issues into Family Courses: Instructor Challenges and Strategies Relative to Perceived Teaching Climate, Family Relations, 62, pp. 699-713, (2013); Lawson E., Feminist Pedagogies: The Textuality of the Racialized Body in the Feminist Classroom, Atlantis, 35, 2, pp. 107-117, (2011); Lee J., Teaching Gender Politics, Teaching Sociology, 21, pp. 26-32, (1993); Lee M., A National Epidemic: Fatal Anti-Transgender Violence in America in 2018, (2018); Leef G., The National Review, (2019); Lipton B., Mackinlay E., We Only Talk Feminist Here: Feminist Academics, Voice, and Agency in the Neoliberal University, (2017); Lukas C.L., Independent Women’s Forum, (2019); Markowitz L., Unmasking Moral Dichotomies: Can Feminist Pedagogy Overcome Student Resistance?, Gender and Education, 17, 1, pp. 39-55, (2005); McCusker G., A Feminist Teacher’s Account of her Attempts to Achieve the Goals of Feminist Pedagogy, Gender and Education, 29, 4, pp. 445-460, (2017); Midkiff B., Exploring Women Faculty’s Experiences and Perceptions in Higher Education: The Effects of Feminism?, Gender and Education, 27, 4, pp. 376-392, (2015); Moore M., Student Resistance to Course Content: Reactions to the Gender of the Messenger, Teaching Sociology, 25, 2, pp. 128-133, (1997); Moore M., Trahan R., Biased and Political: Student Perceptions of Females Teaching About Gender, College Student Journal, 31, 4, pp. 434-445, (1997); (2013); Patai D., Koertge N., Introduction to the World of Women’s Studies, Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women’s Studies, pp. 1-10, (2003); Plikuhn M., Courting Controversy and Allowing for Awkward: Strategies for Teaching Difficult Topics, Learning from Each Other: Refining the Practice of Teaching in Higher Education, pp. 188-200, (2018); Ropers-Huilman B., Constructing Feminist Teachers: Complexities of Identity, Gender and Education, 9, 3, pp. 327-343, (1997); Schmitz R.M., Kazyak E., Checking Privilege at the Door: Men’s Reflections on Masculinity in Women’s and Gender Studies Courses, Gender Issues, 34, pp. 129-148, (2017); Stake J.E., Rose S., The Long-Term Impact of Women’s Studies on Students’ Personal Lives and Political Activism, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, pp. 403-412, (1994); Stake J.E., Sevelius J., Hanly S., Student Responsiveness to Women’s and Gender Studies Classes: The Importance of Initial Student Attitudes and Classroom Relationships, NWSA Journal, 20, 2, pp. 189-215, (2008); Pathways Magazine, (2018); Streamas J., How We Lost Our Academic Freedom: Difference and the Teaching of Ethnic and Gender Studies, Teaching with Tension: Race, Resistance, and Reality in the Classroom, pp. 143-162, (2019); Titus J.J., Engaging Student Resistance to Feminism: 'How is This Stuff Going to Make Us Better Teachers?, Gender and Education, 12, 1, pp. 21-37, (2000); Tuininga M., The Public Discourse, (2016); Turkel K.D., Teaching about Women to Male-Identified Students, Teaching Sociology, 14, pp. 188-190, (1986); (2018); Webber M., ‘Don’t Be So Feminist’: Exploring Student Resistance to Feminist Approaches in a Canadian University, Women’s Studies International Forum, 28, pp. 181-194, (2005); Weiler K., Freire and a Feminist Pedagogy of Difference, Harvard Educational Review, 61, pp. 449-475, (1991); White A.M., Psychology Meets Women’s Studies, Greets Black Studies, Treats Queer Studies: Teaching Diversity and Sexuality across Disciplines, Feminist Teacher, 16, 3, pp. 205-215, (2006); Williams C.D., The Personal Is Apolitical: Neoliberalism and Academic Capitalism in U.S. Women's Studies Programs, Women’s Studies International Forum, 74, pp. 1-8, (2019); Wilson M.A.F., Teaching Whiteness in the Neoliberal University: Positionality, Privilege, Resistance, and Transformation, Teaching with Tension: Race, Resistance, and Reality in the Classroom, pp. 217-236, (2019)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus