CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

A comparative analysis of liberal arts models in three institutions from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan

Tác giả

Leping M.

Năm xuất bản

2021

Source title

Higher Education Forum

Số trích dẫn

0

DOI

10.15027/50747

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108159205&doi=10.15027%2f50747&partnerID=40&md5=5c0555abfcdb283f306d2ba5d3fdc825

Tóm tắt

This research aims to examine the liberal arts models of three institutions in three Chinese societies. The theoretical framework for the study is the capabilities approach. I use a qualitative method of document analysis to examine educational goals, missions, and curricula in the three institutions. The research finds that, with a focus on whole-person cultivation, liberal arts education in the three institutions follows the global model, but their curricula and understandings of liberal arts education are influenced by their social contexts and specific political, cultural, and historical factors. The study contributes to research regarding the diversification of university models at a time when the global research university dominates all ranking systems. © 2021, Hiroshima University,Research Institute for Higher Education,. All rights reserved.

Từ khóa

Capabilities approach; Chinese societies; Confucianism; East asia; General education; Liberal arts education; Whole person cultivation

Tài liệu tham khảo

Boyle M.-E., Global liberal education: Theorizing emergence and variability, Comparative & International Education, 63, 2, pp. 231-248, (2019); Boyle M.-E., Liberal Education across Continents: Transfer Elasticity and US Influence, Comparative Education Review, 64, 2, pp. 000-000, (2020); Chai W.Y., Adapting the Western Model of Liberal Arts Education in China: The Cases of Fudan University and Lingnan University, Liberal Arts Education and Colleges in East Asia, pp. 75-86, (2016); Chang F.T.-J., The Impact of the 1950s’ Sino-American Industrial Vocational Education Cooperative Project on the Current Technical Vocational Education in the Republic of China, (1991); Chopp R., Remaking, renewing, reimagining: The liberal arts college takes advantage of change, Remaking College: Innovation and the Liberal Arts, pp. 13-24, (2014); De Bary W.T., The Great Civilized Conversation: Education for a World Community, (2014); Godwin K.A., The worldwide emergence of liberal education, International Higher Education, 79, pp. 2-4, (2015); Godwin K.A., Altbach P.G., A historical and global perspective on liberal arts education, International Journal of Chinese Education, 5, 1, pp. 5-22, (2016); Harari Y.N., 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, (2018); Harari Y.N., Yuval Noah Harari: The world after coronavirus | Free to read, (2020); Huang C., Liberal arts education in postwar Taiwan: A case study on general education reform at National Taiwan University, Liberal Arts Education and Colleges in East Asia, pp. 87-97, (2016); TVET education in Taiwan, (2016); Jaffee D., The general education initiative in Hong Kong: Organized contradictions and emerging tensions, Higher Education, 64, 2, pp. 193-206, (2012); Jiang Y.G., Liberal arts education in a changing society: A new perspective on Chinese higher education, (2014); Jung I., Nishimura M., Sasao T., Liberal Arts Education and Colleges in East Asia, (2016); Kirby W.C., Liberal education in China, CIHE Perspectives, 8, pp. 34-39, (2017); Labaree D.F., A perfect mess: The unlikely ascendancy of American higher education, (2017); Lee T.H., Education in traditional China: A history, 13, (2000); Li M., Shi J., The Impacts of Liberal Arts Education on Undergraduate Programs:Fulfillment or Frustration?, (2013); McKay D., The Future of the Liberal Arts: A Global Conversation, (2016); McKinlay R., Little R., The Liberal, Socialist and Realist Models, Global problems and world order, pp. 24-89, (1986); Miller G.E., The Meaning of General Education: The Emergence of a Curriculum Paradigm, (1988); Mok K.H., Should higher education be vocationalised? The role of liberal-arts education in Hong Kong, American Universities Abroad: The Leadership of Independent Transnational Higher Education Institutions, (2017); Mok K.H., The quest for world-class university status: Implications for sustainable development of Asian universities, (2016); Mou L., Exploring Liberal Arts Education Models in the 21st Century: Insights from East Asia, North America, and West Europe, Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2020, (2020); Mou L., The Liberal Arts Curriculum in China’s Former Christian Universities, International Journal of Chinese Education, 9, 1, pp. 25-46, (2020); Nelson A., The “Invention” of Liberal Education in the United States, 1870-1940, (2020); Newman J.H., The Idea of a University. 1852, (1982); Ng P., Chongji yu yanda Weiyuan fu weiming [The relationship between Chung Chi College and Yenching University], (2020); Ng Y., Relationality and engagement: The spirit and contemporary relevance of the whole person education, Whole person education: Sino-West dialogue, pp. 82-95, (2017); Nussbaum M.C., Cultivating humanity, (1998); Nussbaum M.C., Women and human development: The capabilities approach, 3, (2001); Nussbaum M.C., Creating capabilities: The human development approach and its implementation, Hypatia, 24, 3, pp. 211-215, (2009); Nussbaum M.C., Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities, 2, (2010); Postiglione G., China’s search for its liberal arts and sciences model, Experiences in liberal arts and science education from America, Europe, and Asia, pp. 17-31, (2016); Sen A., The Capabilities Approach in Practice, 14, 3, pp. 351-376, (1993); Sen A., Development as Freedom, (1999); Shen W., Liberal education traditions in the United Kingdom and United States: An historical perspective, Higher Education Forum, 13, pp. 25-42, (2016); Shi J., Lu Y., Empiricism and Idealism, International Journal of Chinese Education, 5, 1, pp. 23-40, (2016); Spreafico A., Liberal arts education and the formation of valuable capabilities, Human Development and Capabilities, Re-Imagining the University of the Twenty-First Century, pp. 129-144, (2013); Van Der Wende M., Trends towards global excellence in undergraduate education: Taking the liberal arts experience into the 21st century, International Journal of Chinese Education, 2, 2, pp. 289-307, (2014); Wang W., Yuanpei Program in Peking University, (2015); Yang R., The East-West Axis? Liberal Arts Education in East Asian Universities, Liberal Arts Education and Colleges in East Asia, pp. 27-37, (2016); Zayed K.S., The Paradox of Mortimer J. Adler, Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 5, pp. 41-46, (2013)

Nơi xuất bản

Hiroshima University,Research Institute for Higher Education,

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus