CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Speculating on the liberal arts: Exploring possible futures for humanities education

Tác giả

Steele S.

Năm xuất bản

2022

Source title

Arts and Humanities in Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

0

DOI

10.1177/14740222211050551

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119138542&doi=10.1177%2f14740222211050551&partnerID=40&md5=d311973f5d2c55248b04eccbfcb2e228

Tóm tắt

The article draws on concepts from speculative design to explore an alternative educational group existing outside the boundaries of an accredited university. Inspired by the imaginative approach of speculative design, I propose a small-scale reading and discussion group as a pathway to explore possible futures open to aspects of humanities education. The concept aims to reposition elements of the humanities from within the degree-granting Canadian university space to engage the wider public through a network meant to ideally foster an interconnected community of learners. This rhizomatic network would provide avenues for those without the means, access, or desire to pursue post-secondary education in the humanities to engage in questions that are relevant to their lived experience. I use an inquiry-based model of learning to explore probable, plausible, and preferable futures for liberal arts education as a way to challenge some current modes of thinking and provoke further discussion and research. © The Author(s) 2021.

Từ khóa

alternative education; humanities; inquiry-based learning; liberal arts; post-secondary education; problem-based learning; reading and discussion groups; rhizomatic education; speculative design

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler M.J., Wolff P., A General Introduction to the Great Books and to a Liberal Education, (1959); Barnett R., Imagining the University, (2013); Bowen W.G., More to hope than to fear: the future of the liberal arts colleges, Remaking College: Innovation and the Liberal Arts, pp. 189-201, (2014); Bernstein J.H., Transdisciplinarity: a review of its origins, development, and current issues, Journal of Research Practice, 11, 1, pp. 1-20, (2015); Chaplin H., Why John Seely Brown Says We Should Look Beyond Creativity to Cultivate Imagination, (2014); Chopp R., Remaking, renewing, reimagining: the liberal arts college takes advantage of change, Remaking College: Innovation and the Liberal Arts, pp. 13-24, (2014); Cote J.E., Allahar A., Lowering Higher Education: The Rise of Corporate Universities and the Fall of Liberal Education, (2011); Cormier D., Rhizomatic education: community as curriculum, Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4, 2, (2008); Cormier D., Rhizomatic learning – Why We Teach?, (2011); Deleuze G., Guattari F., A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, (1987); Dunne A., Raby F., Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, (2013); Ellison R., Invisible Man, (1952); Fanon F., The fact of blackness, Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader, pp. 257-265; Ferrall V.E., The liberal arts and Why We Should Care about them, Liberal Arts at the Brink, pp. 7-22, (2011); Kathleen F., Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University, (2019); Friere P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed, (1970); Greene M., Landscapes of Learning, (1978); Halse J., Ethnographies of the possible, Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, pp. 180-196, (2013); hooks B., Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, (1994); hooks B., Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope, (2003); Illich I., Celebration of Awareness: A Call for Institutional Revolution, (1969); Illich I., Deschooling Society, (1970); Kjaersgaard M.G., Smith R.C., Vangkilde K.T., Et al., Introduction: design anthropological futures, Design Anthropological Futures, pp. 1-16, (2016); McAuliffe J.D., The Networked College – Local, Global, Virtual. In: Rebecca C, Susan F, and Daniel HW (eds), Remaking College: Innovation and the Liberal Arts, pp. 13-24, (2014); McCaughan K., Et al., Theoretical anchors for Barrow’s PBL tutor guidelines, Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning, pp. 57-68, (2015); Miller P., Is design thinking the new liberal arts?”. The chronicle of higher education, (2015); Miller R.K., Linder B., Is Design Thinking the New Liberal Arts of Education?, (2015); Morrison T., Black matters, Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, pp. 3-28, (1992); Muscatine C., Fixing College Education: A New Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century, (2009); Newfield C., The Great Mistake: How We Wrecked Public Universities and How We Can Fix Them, (2016); Norgard R.T., Toft-Nielsen C., Whitton N., Playful learning in higher education: developing a signature pedagogy, International Journal of Play, 6, 3, pp. 272-282, (2017); Porterfield D.R., Technology, learning, and campus culture, Remaking College: Innovation and the Liberal Arts, pp. 115-122, (2014); Savery J.R., Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions, Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning, pp. 5-15, (2015); Schumacher E.F., Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered, (1973); Stanley D.J., Alternative Universities: Speculative Design for Innovation in Higher Education, (2019); Thomas D., Brown J.S., A New Culture of Learning: Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change, (2011); Woodcock J., Graham M., The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction, (2020); Wright E.O., Envisioning Real Utopias, (2010)

Nơi xuất bản

SAGE Publications Ltd

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus