CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Do Party Schools Report Higher Rates of Violence Against Women in Their Clery Data? A Latent Class Analysis
Tác giả
Wiersma-Mosley J.D.; Willis M.; Jozkowski K.N.; Cleveland M.J.
Năm xuất bản
2020
Source title
Violence Against Women
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.1177/1077801219840436
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The current study examined violent crimes against women among 1,384 four-year private and public college campuses using Clery Act data from 2014-2016 (i.e., rape, domestic and dating violence, stalking, and fondling). Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify five types of campuses: smaller (22%), liberal arts (25%), satellite (16%), private (19%), and party schools (18%). Smaller schools reported the lowest rates of violence against women (VAW), whereas private schools had significantly higher reported rapes. These findings have important implications for the types of campuses seem to be abiding by Clery law and reporting crimes that involve VAW. © The Author(s) 2019.
Từ khóa
Clery data; Greek life; latent class analysis; party schools; violence against women
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbey A., McAuslan P., A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, pp. 747-769, (2004); Adams M.A., Ding D., Sallis J.F., Bowles H.R., Ainsworth B.E., Bergman P., Et al., Patterns of neighborhood environment attributes related to physical activity across 11 countries: A latent class analysis, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, (2013); Adams-Curtis L.E., Forbes G.B., College women’s experiences of sexual coercion: A review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, pp. 91-122, (2004); Akaike H., A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, pp. 716-723, (1974); Campus sexual assault: Suggested policies and procedures, (2013); Armstrong E.A., Hamilton L.T., Sweeney B., Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape, Social Problems, 53, pp. 483-499, (2006); Banyard V.L., Plante E.G., Moynihan M.M., Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention, Journal of Community Psychology, 32, pp. 61-79, (2004); Bell K.M., Naugle A.E., Effects of social desirability on students’ self-reporting of partner abuse perpetration and victimization, Violence and Victims, 22, pp. 243-256, (2007); (2019); Bridgestock L., Guide to types of university in the US, Top Universities, (2015); Buhi E.R., Clayton H., Surrency H.H., Stalking victimization among college women and subsequent help-seeking behaviors, Journal of American College Health, 57, pp. 419-426, (2009); Cantalupo N.C., Institution-specific victimization surveys: Addressing legal and practical disincentives to gender-based violence reporting on college campuses, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15, pp. 227-241, (2014); Cantor D., Fisher W.B., Chibnall S., Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct, (2015); Title IX: Tracking sexual assault investigations, (2017); Cullmann A., Benchmarking and firm heterogeneity: A latent class analysis for German electricity distribution companies, Empirical Economics, 42, pp. 147-169, (2012); DeKeseredy W.S., Schwartz M.D., Male peer support and violence against women: The history and verification of a theory, (2013); Fisher B.S., Cullen F.T., Turner M.G., The sexual victimization of college women, (2000); Fisher B.S., Daigle L.E., Cullen F.T., Turner M.G., Acknowledging sexual victimization as rape: Results from a national-level study, Journal of Justice Quarterly, 20, pp. 535-574, (2003); Foubert J.D., Newberry J.T., Tatum J., Behavior differences seven months later: Effects of a rape prevention program, NASPA Journal, 44, pp. 728-749, (2007); Godenzi A., Schwartz M.D., DeKeseredy W.S., Toward a gendered social bond/male peer support theory of university woman abuse, Critical Criminology, 10, pp. 1-16, (2001); Guffey J.E., Crime on campus: Can Clery Act data from universities and colleges be trusted?, Journal of American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1, pp. 51-61, (2013); (2008); Hines D.A., Saudino K.J., Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactic Scales, Violence and Victims, 18, pp. 197-217, (2003); Humphrey S.E., Kahn A.S., Fraternities, athletic teams, and rape, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, pp. 1313-1320, (2000); Jenkins W., Federal title IX investigations, explained, Student Life, (2017); Jozkowski K.N., Wiersma-Mosley J.D., The Greek system: How gender inequality and class privilege perpetuate rape culture [Special issue: Feminist framings of sexual violence on college campuses], Family Relations, 66, pp. 89-103, (2017); Karjane H.M., Fisher B.S., Cullen F.T., Campus sexual assault: How America’s institutions of higher education respond, (2002); Katz J., Reconstructing masculinity in the locker room: Mentors in violence prevention, Harvard Educational Review, 65, pp. 163-174, (1995); Kimble N.B., Russo S.A., Bergman B.G., Galindo V.H., Revealing an empirical understanding of aggression and violent behavior in athletics, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, pp. 446-462, (2010); Kimmel M.S., Kimmel M.S., Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men, (2008); Klein L., Graham L.M., Treves-Kagan S., Deck P.G., DeLong S.M., Martin S.L., Leveraging data to strengthen campus sexual assault policies, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, pp. 3298-3314, (2018); Koss M.P., Gidycz C.A., Wisniewski N., The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, pp. 162-170, (1987); Krebs C.P., Lindquist C.H., Warner T.D., Fisher B.S., Martin S.L., The campus sexual assault (CSA) study: Final report, (2007); Lanza S.T., Collins L.M., Lemmon D.R., Schafer J.L., PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis, Structural Equation Modeling, 14, pp. 671-694, (2007); Lanza S.T., Flaherty B.P., Collins L.M., Latent class and latent transition models, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology, pp. 663-685, (2003); Lasky N.V., Fisher B.S., Henriksen C.B., Swan S.C., Binge drinking, Greek-life membership, and first-year undergraduates: The “perfect storm” for drugging victimization, Journal of School Violence, 16, pp. 173-188, (2017); Lindo J.M., Siminski P.M., Swensen I.D., College party culture and sexual assault, (2015); Marshall R., Will it really SaVE you? Analyzing the campus sexual violence elimination act, Legislation and Policy Brief, 6, pp. 271-293, (2014); Marsil D.F., McNamara C., An examination of the disparity between self-identified versus legally identified rape victimization: A pilot study, Journal of American College Health, 64, pp. 416-420, (2016); McCaskill C., Sexual violence on campus: How too many institutions of higher education are failing to protect students, (2014); Minow J.C., Einolf C.J., Sorority participation and sexual assault risk, Violence Against Women, 15, pp. 835-851, (2009); Minton R., Sports culture and sexual assault on US college campuses: Is there a correlation?, (2012); Muehlenhard C.L., Humphreys T.P., Jozkowski K.N., Peterson Z.D., The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review, Journal of Sex Research, 53, pp. 457-487, (2016); Muehlenhard C.L., Peterson Z.D., Humphreys T.P., Jozkowski K.N., Evaluating the one in five statistic: The prevalence of sexual assault among college students, Journal of Sex Research, 54, pp. 549-576, (2017); Murnen S.K., Wright C., Kaluzny G., If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression, Sex Roles, 46, pp. 359-375, (2002); O'Sullivan C., Acquaintance gang rape on campus, Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime, pp. 140-156, (1991); Palmer J., Alda E., Examining the impact of federal grants to reduce violent crimes against women on campus, Review of Higher Education, 40, 1, pp. 63-89, (2016); Parker E.M., Gielen A.C., Castillo R., Webster D.W., Glass N., Intimate partner violence and patterns of safety strategy use among women seeking temporary protective orders: A latent class analysis, Violence Against Women, 22, pp. 1663-1681, (2016); Planty M., Langton L., Krebs C., Berzofsky M., Smiley-McDonald H., Female victims of sexual violence, 1994-2010, (2013); Party schools, (2017); Sabina C., Ho L., Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision, Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 15, pp. 201-226, (2014); Safai P., Boys behaving badly: Popular literature on the misbehavior of male team sport athletes in North America, International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37, pp. 97-102, (2002); Sanday P.R., Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus, (1990); Schwartz M.D., DeKeseredy W.S., Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support, (1997); Schwartz M.D., DeKeseredy W.S., Tait D., Alvi S., Male peer support and a feminist routine activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus, Justice Quarterly, 18, pp. 623-649, (2001); Schwarz G., Estimating the dimension of a model, Annals of Statistics, 6, pp. 61-464, (1978); Stader D.L., Williams-Cunningham J.L., Campus sexual assault, institutional betrayal, and Title IX, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90, pp. 198-202, (2017); Stotzer R.L., MacCartney D., The role of institutional factors on on-campus reported rape prevalence, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, pp. 2687-2707, (2015); Strang E., Peterson Z.D., Use of a bogus pipeline to detect men’s underreporting of sexually aggressive behavior, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, (2016); (2011); pp. 89-92, (2013); Weiss K.G., Party school: Crime, campus, and community, (2013); Weiss K.G., Dilks L.M., Intoxication and crime risk: Contextualizing the effects of “party” routines on recurrent physical and sexual attacks among college students, Criminal Justice Review, 41, pp. 173-189, (2016); Not alone: The first report of the White House task force to protect students from sexual assault, (2014); Wiersma-Mosley J.D., DiLoreto J., The role of Title IX coordinators on college and university campuses, Behavioral Sciences Special Issue on Sexual Violence, 8, 4, pp. 38-52, (2018); Wiersma-Mosley J.D., Jozkowski K.N., Martinez T., An empirical investigation of campus demographics and reported rapes, Journal of American College Health, 65, pp. 482-491, (2017); Wilkins S., Huisman J., The international branch campus as transnational strategy in higher education, Higher Education, 64, pp. 627-645, (2012); Wolitzky-Taylor K.B., Resnick H.S., McCauley J.L., Amstadter A.B., Kilpatrick D.G., Ruggiero K.J., Is reporting of rape on the rise? A comparison of women with reported versus unreported rape experiences in the national women’s study-replication, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, pp. 807-832, (2011); Wood M., Stichman A., Not a big deal? Examining help-seeking behaviors of sexually victimized women on the college campus, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62, pp. 1415-1429, (2016); Yung C.R., Concealing campus sexual assault: An empirical examination, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21, 1, pp. 1-9, (2015); Zinzow H.M., Thompson M., Barriers to reporting sexual victimization: Prevalence and correlates among undergraduate women, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 20, pp. 711-725, (2011)
Nơi xuất bản
SAGE Publications Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus