CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

STEM education for the 21st century

Tác giả

Penprase B.E.

Năm xuất bản

2020

Source title

STEM Education for the 21st Century

Số trích dẫn

8

DOI

10.1007/978-3-030-41633-1

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85087420641&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-41633-1&partnerID=40&md5=687748db61f40c51f7a8877026a2a920

Tóm tắt

This book chronicles the revolution in STEM teaching and learning that has arisen from a convergence of educational research, emerging technologies, and innovative ways of structuring both the physical space and classroom activities in STEM higher education. Beginning with a historical overview of US higher education and an overview of diversity in STEM in the US, the book sets a context in which our present-day innovation in science and technology urgently needs to provide more diversity and inclusion within STEM fields. Research-validated pedagogies using active learning and new types of research-based curriculum is transforming how physics, biology and other fields are taught in leading universities, and the book gives profiles of leading innovators in science education and examples of exciting new research-based courses taking root in US institutions. The book includes interviews with leading scientists and educators, case studies of new courses and new institutions, and descriptions of site visits where new trends in 21st STEM education are being developed. The book also takes the reader into innovative learning environments in engineering where students are empowered by emerging technologies to develop new creative capacity in their STEM education, through new centers for design thinking and liberal arts-based engineering. Equally innovative are new conceptual frameworks for course design and learning, and the book explores the concepts of Scientific Teaching, Backward Course Design, Threshold Concepts and Learning Taxonomies in a systematic way with examples from diverse scientific fields. Finally, the book takes the reader inside the leading centers for online education, including Udacity, Coursera and EdX, interviews the leaders and founders of MOOC technology, and gives a sense of how online education is evolving and what this means for STEM education. This book provides a broad and deep exploration into the historical context of science education and into some of the cutting-edge innovations that are reshaping how leading universities teach science and engineering. The emergence of exponentially advancing technologies such as synthetic biology, artificial intelligence and materials sciences has been described as the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and the book explores how these technologies will shape our future will bring a transformation of STEM curriculum that can help students solve many the most urgent problems facing our world and society. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. All rights reserved.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Race and ethnicity of physics, (2019); Banaji M.R., Greenwald A.G., Blindspot, (2013); Bowen W.G., Bok D.C., The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in College and University Admissions, (1998); de Tocqueville A., Democracy in America, (1954); Duvall S.M., Themethodist episcopal church and education up to 1869, (1928); Geiger R.L., The history of American higher education: Learning and culture from the founding to world war Ii, (2015); Giamatti A.B., A free and ordered space: The real world of the university, (1988); 17th/18th century curriculum overview, (2017); Haynes B., Black undergraduates in higher education: An historical perspective, Metropolitan Universities, 17, 2, (2006); Hollis D.W., University of South Carolina, (1951); Jantti M., Et al., American exceptionalism in a new light: A comparison of intergenerational earnings mobility in the nordic countries, the United Kingdom, and the United State, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1938. Retreived January, 16, (2006); Jefferson T., Autobiography.University ofChicago, (1821); Johnson C., The Negro College Graduate, (1938); Levine D.O., The American College and the culture of aspiration, 1915-1940, (1986); Primary documents in American history-Morill Act, (2010); Malcolm S., Feder M., Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students' diverse pathways, National Academies Press, (2016); McCarthy N., The countries with the most STEM graduates, Forbes Magazine, (2017); Colleges of agriculture at the land grant universities: A profile, Chapter 1, National Academies Press, (1995); Expanding underrepresented minority participation, (2011); Morril Act (1862), (2019); 120 years of American education: A statistical portrait, (1993); Digest of educational statistics: Table 318.45, (2017); Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering, (2017); Doctorate recipients from U.S. Universities, (2017); National Science Board-Science and Engineering indicators 2018, (2018); Economic policy reforms:Going for growth 2010, (2010); Economic policy reforms 2018-Going for growth interim report, (2018); Financial security and mobility, (2016); IAT website, (2019); Salovey P., Yale and the American dream, Yale News, (2013); West point in the making of America, (2019); Vision and change in undergraduate biology education-A call to action, (2011); Armbruster P., Patel M., Johnson E., Weiss M., Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology, CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8, 3, (2017); Improving undergraduate biology education based on research in science learning, (2019); TheBioQUEST curriculum consortium, (2019); History of BioQUEST, (2019); Bothun G., The electronic universe, (2013); Campbell A.M., Ledbetter M., Hoopes L., Eckdahl T., Heyer L., Rosenwald A., Et al., Genome consortium for active teaching: Meeting the goals of BIO2010, CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, pp. 109-118, (2007); Crouch C., Mazur E., Peer instruction ten years of experience and results, American Journal of Physics, 69, pp. 970-977, (2001); Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M., Smith M.K., Okoroafor N., Jorda H., Wenderoth M.P., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, PNAS, (2014); Hake R., Lessons from the physics education reform effort, Conservation Ecology, 5, 2, (2002); Hake R., Interactive-engagement versus traditionalmethods:Asix-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, 66, (2005); Halloun I., Hestenes D., The initial knowledge state of college physics students, American Journal of Physics, 53, (1985); Handelsman talks scientific education, Yale Daily News, (2012); Hestenes D., Wells M., Swackhamer G., The Physics Teacher, 30, pp. 141-158, (1992); Inclusive excellence, (2019); Jordan T., Et al., A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students, MBio, 5, 1, pp. e01051-13, (2014); Kuhn T.S., The structure of scientific revolutions, (1996); Lambert C., Twilight of the lecture, Harvard Magazine, (2012); Mazur E., Peer instruction: A user's manual, (1996); Mazur E., Farewell lecture?, Science, 323, (2009); Mazur E., The flipped classroom will redefine the role of educators, Interview in the EvoLLLution Online Magazine, (2013); Mazur E., Schell J., Turn to your neighbour-Peer instruction network blog, (2019); Mihos C., Dynamical astronomy Javalab, (2013); Miller S., Pfund C., Pribbenow C.M., Handelsman J., Scientific teaching in practice, Science, 322, (2008); Moore T., Six ideas that shaped physics-A review of the goals, (2019); BIO2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists, (2003); Peterson N., Jungck J.R., Problem-posing, problem-solving, and persuasion in biology, Academic Computing, 2, 6, pp. 14-17, (1988); Rogers E., Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.), (2003); Semsar K., Knight J.K., Birol G., Smith M.K., The colorado learning attitudes about science survey (CLASS) for use in biology, CBE Life Science Education, 10, 3, (2011); TinyEarth-About us, (2019); Discovering tiny earth, (2019); Wieman C., Why not try a scientific approach to science education?, Change, 2007, (2007); Wieman C., The 'Curse of Knowledge,' or Why intuition about teaching often fails, APS News, 16, 10, (2007); Wieman C., A better way to evaluate undergraduate teaching, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47, 1, pp. 6-15, (2015); Wieman C., Improving how universities teach science-Lessons from the science education initiative, (2017); Wieman C., Gilbert S., The teaching practices inventory: A new tool for characterizing college and university teaching in mathematics and science, CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 3, (2014); Barnett R., Learning for an unknown future, Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 3, (2004); Belenky M.F., Clinchy B.M., Goldberger N.R., Tarulel J.M., Women's ways of knowing, (1986); Biggs J., Tang C., Applying constructive alignment to outcomes-based teaching and learning, (2009); Biggs J., Tang C., Teaching for quality learning at university, (2011); Bloom B., Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domains, (1956); Cheek K., Why is geologic time troublesome knowledge?, Threshold concepts and transformational learning, pp. 117-130, (2010); Dewey J., My pedagogic creed, (1897); Dewey J., Education and experience, (1938); Handelsman J., Miller S., Pfund C., Scientific teaching, (2007); Land R., Cousin G., Meyer J.H.F., Davies P., Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation, Improving student learning-Equality and diversity, (2005); Luft J., Ingham H., The JoHari window, a graphic model of interpersonal awareness, (1955); Martin M., Ice nucleation by bacteria, (2011); Mead J., Gray S., Contexts for threshold concepts (I): A conceptual structure for localizing candidates, Threshold concepts and transformational learning, pp. 97-116, (2010); Meyer J., Land R., Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 1-Linkages toways of thinking and practising, Improving student learning-Ten years on, (2003); Meyer J.H.F., Land R., Davies P., Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation, Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, (2006); Miller G.E., The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance, Academic Medicine, 63, pp. S63-S67, (1990); Moss P.M., Taylor C., Hughes C., Kofod M., Whitaker N., Lutze-Mann L., Tzioumis V., Threshold concepts: Challenging the way we think, teach and learn in biology, Threshold concepts and transformational learning, pp. 179-192, (2010); Teaching as clinical information processing, NIEConference on Studies in Teaching; Panel 6, (1975); Palmer J.A., Fifty modern thinkers on education, (2001); Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates, Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, (2012); Reichard D., Takayama K., Exploring student learning in unfamiliar territory:Ahumanist and a scientist compare notes, The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines, (2012); Shulman L.S., Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective, Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36, (1996); Takayama K., The value of uncertainty in the learning sciences: Intersections of technology and student engagement, (2016); Taylor C., Meyer H.F., The testable hypothesis as a threshold concept for biology students, Threshold concepts and transformational learning, pp. 179-192, (2010); Two examples of taxonomies of educational outcomes, (2005); Thomas L., Et al., Threshold concepts in computer science: An ongoing empirical investigation, Threshold concepts and transformational learning, pp. 241-258, (2010); Vonnegut K., Cat's cradle, (1963); Vygotsky L.S., Mind in society, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, (1978); Scientific Teaching Summer Institute, (2018); Boudreau K., Hanlan L.R., Dodson L., DiBiasio D., Abel C., Sullivan J.M., Gaudette G.R., Bergendahl J., Demetry C., Humanitarian engineering, past and present: A roleplaying first-year course, (2016); Bucciarelli L., Drew D., Tobias S., Liberal studies in engineering-Workshop report, (2015); Byars-Winston A., Estrada Y., Howard C., Davis D., Zalapa J., Influence of social cognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science and engineering: A multiple-groups analysis, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 2, (2010); Learn by doing lab, (2019); Center for expressive technology, (2019); Revolutionizing entrepreurship, (2019); What is SI?, (2019); Freedom to choose. LAES Brochure, (2019); Engineering Possibilities in College (EPIC), (2019); Clark L., Cal Poly is the Whitest Public University in California-By a lot, San Luis Obispo Tribune, (2018); Origin of the new space revolution, (2019); Cunningham W.J., Engineering at Yale: School, Department, Council, 1932-1982 (xiii, (1992); Guizzo E., The Olin experiment, IEEE Spectrum, (2006); Hi' to the Harvard Innovation Lab, (2011); Kembel G., d.school operators handbook, (2007); Letchford J., A small school with grand ambitions, Yale Daily News, (2009); Marcus J., An unknown quantity, National Cross Talk, (2002); Amy Smith, (2019); International design summits, (2019); The integration of the humanities and arts with sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education: Branches from the same tree, (2018); User oriented collaborative design, (2019); The academic experience, (2019); Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, (2012); Riley D.M., McNair L.D., Masters S., MAKER: An ethnography of maker and hacker spaces achieving diverse participation; Schwartz J., Re-engineering engineering, New York Times Magazine, (2007); Schwinger J., Einstein's legacy-The unity of space and time, (1986); Snow C.P., The Rede Lecture, 1959-The two cultures, (1959); Vanderlick K., Message from the Dean. Yale Engineering 2011, (2011); Wang K., Study on the careers of MIT Mechanical Engineering undergraduate alumni, (2015); Werner D., Cubesat co-inventor Jordi Puig-Suari sails into the sunset, Space News, (2018); Great problems seminar, (2019); Yale engineering, (2018); Y-Shaped engineers, (2019); Global freshman academy, (2019); Chuang I., Ho A., HarvardX and MITx: Four years of open online courses-fall 2012- summer 2016, (2016); By the numbers: MOOCs in 2017, (2017); Corcoran B., Udacity's lessons learned. EdSurge Online Journal, (2013); Downes S., Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge, Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5, 1, (2008); Farr C., Coursera nabs $43 M to bring online education to emerging markets, Venturebeat Online Journal, (2013); Harris P.L., SJSU plus: Fall 2013 update, SJSU Today, (2013); HarvardX: Year in review 2015-16, (2016); Hill P., Feldstein M., Everything you thought you knew about MOOCs could be wrong, ELI Online Spring Focus Session, (2013); Khosla V., Udacity to focus on individual student projects, The Economic Times (India), (2017); Koller D., What we are learning from online education?, TED Talk, (2012); Kolowich S., American council on education recommends 5MOOCs for credit, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2013); Lewin T., California bill seeks campus credit for online study, NewYork Times, (2013); Michelen A., High-ranking universities to sign a virtual exchange agreement, Engineering 360 from IEEE GlobalSpec, (2017); Milligan C., Littlejohn A., Margaryan A., Patterns of engagement in Connectivist MOOCs, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 2, (2013); Rosen R., The single biggest change in education since the printing press, The Atlantic., (2012); Shah D., Eyeing revenue sustainability: The two biggest MOOC providers adapt how their courses work, (2015); Shah D., Udacity's nanodegree plus comes with a job guarantee, (2016); Shah D., A product at every price: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2017, (2017); Shah D., Udacity shows strong growth, launches flying car nanodegree with MIT faculty, (2017); Siemens G., Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 1, pp. 3-10, (2005); Sinha N., 6 new degrees coming to coursera in computer science, data science, and public health, Coursera Blog, (2018); Stanford takes landmark step in online learning, appoints new vice provost, Stanford News, (2012); Data-driven research-Accelerating and scaling the science of learning at CAROL and the Stanford Lytics lab, (2017); Straumsheim C., Boost for udacity project, Inside Higher Education, (2013); Thrun S., A new job guarantee, (2016); Walker J.M., Relive the best moments from open edX2018, Open edX Blog, (2018); Walsh C., Harvard receives $40 million for innovative teaching and learning, Harvard Gazette, (2011); Walters H., Reinventing education for millenials: Anant Agarwal at TEDGlobal 2013, TED Blog, (2013); Wiener J., Inside the Coursera Hype Machine, The Nation, (2013); Integrative and applied learning VALUE rubric, (2010); Vision and change in undergraduate biology education-A call to action, Vision and Change, (2011); Educating doctors to provide high quality medical care-A vision for medical education in the United States, Report of the AAMC Ad Hoc Committee of Deans, (2004); The role of the private sector in training the next generation of bioscientists, Training the Next Generation of Biomedical Scientists, (2000); Auerbach S., The iCons four-year curriculum plan, (2015); Beane J.A., Toward a coherent curriculum. ASCD Yearbook, Association for Supervision and Curriuclum Development, (1995); Bialek W., Botstein D., Introductory science and mathematics education for 21st-century biologists, Science, 303, (2004); Bloom J., Patterns that connect: Rethinking our approach to learning, teaching, and curriculum, Curriculum and Teaching (James Nicholas Publishers), 19, pp. 5-26, (2004); Botstein D., Integrated Science curriculum, (2017); Bryk A.S., Gomez L.M., Grunow A., Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education, (2010); General Education Foundation (GEF) programme, (2017); Copp N.H., Black K., Gould S., Accelerated Integrated Science sequence: An interdisciplinary introductory course for science majors, Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 11, pp. A76-A81, (2012); Fogarty R., Ten ways to integrate curriculum, Educational Leadership., (1991); Interdisciplinarity-Survey report for the global research council, Annual Meeting, (2016); Harden R.M., The integration ladder, Medical Education, 34, (2000); Hubball H., Burt H., An integrated approach to developing and implementing learningcentered curricula, International Journal of Academic Development, 9, (2015); Hubball H., Gold N., The scholarship of curriculum practice and undergraduate program reform: Integrating theory into practice, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, (2007); B.S. in Integrated Science, (2017); Lattuca L.R., Creating interdisciplinarity, (2001); Malik A.S., Malik R.H., Twelve tips for developing an integrated curriculum, Medical Teacher, 33, pp. 99-104, (2011); Martensson K., Roxa T., Promoting learning and professional development through communities of practice, Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice, 5, (2014); Mathison S., Freeman M., The logic of interdisciplinary studies. ERIC, (1998); Honours Integrated Science program, (2017); Addressing the nation's changing needs for biomedical and behavioral scientists, (2000); Bio 2010-Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists, (2003); Integrated Science program, (2017); The five parts of the core, (2017); Oliver B., Jones S., Ferns S., Tucker B., Mapping curricula: Ensuring work-ready graduates by mapping course learning outcomes and higher order thinking skills. Presented at the Evaluations and Assessment Conference, Brisbane, (2007); Pearson M.L., Hubball H.T., Curricular integration in pharmacy education, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76, 10, (2012); Student profile, (2017); Integrated Science curriculum, (2017); Purvis-Roberts K.L., Edwalds-Gilbert G., Landsberg A.S., Copp N., Accelerated Integrated Science Sequence (AISS)-An introductory biology, chemistry and physics course, Journal of Chemical Education, 86, 11, (2009); Richlin L., Essington A., Overview of faculty learning communities, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, (2004); Simkins S., Maier M., Just-in-time teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy, (2009); Symons S.L., Colgoni A., Harvey C., Student perceptions of staged transfer to independent research skills during a four-year honours science undergraduate program, 8, 1, (2017); Science One, (2017); iCons program, (2017); Why iCons, (2017); SCNC112 fundamentals of modern science, (2017); The centre for interdisciplinary science, (2017); Integrated Science curriculum, (2017); Yale-NUS College common curriculum report, (2013); Scientific foundations for future physicians, (2009); Abate T., New bioengineering major culminated department's evolution, (2015); Atkeson A., Kehoe P., Modeling the transition to a new economy: Lessons from two technological revolutions, American Economic Review, pp. 64-88, (2007); Bostrom N., Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies, (2014); Bucciarelli L., Drew D., Liberal studies in engineering-A design plan, Engineering Studies, pp. 103-122, (2015); Burgess M., China's supercomputer simulated the universe with 10 trillion digital particles, Wired Magazine, (2017); Bush V., Science-The endless frontier, NSF, (1945); Cameron D., Bashor C., Collins J.J., Abrief history of synthetic biology, Nature Reviews Microbiology, pp. 381-390, (2014); Cyert M., Developing a new introductory biology curriculum, (2017); Das N., Recovery of precious metals through biosorption-A review, Hydrometallurgy, 103, (2010); Drexler K.E., Engines of creation, (1986); Eliot C.L., The new education, The Atlantic, (1869); Elrod S., Kezar A., Increasing student success in STEM: A guide to systemic institutional change, (2016); Endy A., Yale-NUS college STEM innovation conference, (2016); Gershenfeld N., How to make almost anything, Foreign Affairs, 91, 6, pp. 43-57, (2012); Godwin K., Pickus N., Liberal arts & sciences innovation in China: Six recommendations to shape the future, Publications-Center for international higher education, (2017); Gregorian V., American higher education: An obligation to the future, Carnegie Reporter (Carnegie Foundation), pp. 82-91, (2014); Hilborn R.C., Howes R.H., Krane K.S., Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics, (2003); Hobsbawm E., Industry and empire-The birth of the industrial revolution, (1968); Kurzweil R., The singularity is near, (2005); Liberal arts consortium for online learning, (2017); Mammino L., Zunin V.G., Worldwide trends in green chemistry education, (2015); Mazur E., Farewell, lecture, Science, 323, pp. 50-51, (2009); Mendez C., This is CS50 (Harvard Crimson ed.), (2014); Institute-wide task force on the future of MIT education, (2013); Artificial intelligence and machine learning to accelerate translational research: Proceedings of a workshop in brief, (2018); Biodefense in the age of synthetic biology, (2018); Perry C., In Ap 50, students own their education, (2013); Peters M., Technological unemployment: educating for the fourth industrial revolution, Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 5, 1, pp. 25-33, (2017); Philp J., The bioeconomy, the challenge of the century for policymakers, NewBiotechnology, 40, pp. 11-19, (2017); Rogers A., The way the world ends: not with a bang but a paperclip, Wired Magazine, (2017); Roll N., For-credit MOOC: Best of both worlds, (2017); Rosen W., The most powerful idea in the world-A story of steam, industry and invention, (2010); Rosenberg J.S., An educated core, HarvardMagazine, (2017); Schwab K., The fourth industrial revolution: What it means and how to respond, (2016); General education curriculum, (2018); Learning and living at stanford-An exploration of undergraduate experiences in the future, (2013); Wallace-Wells D., The uninhabitable earth, (2017); Weightman G., The industrial revolutionaries, (2007); Accelerating workforce reskilling for the fourth industrial revolution an agenda for leaders to shape the future of education, gender and work, (2017); Realizing human potential in the fourth industrial revolution- An agenda for leaders to shape the future of education, gender and work, (2017); Reports on the course of instruction in Yale College, (1828); Yampolskiy R.V., Artificial superintelligence: a futuristic approach, (2016)

Nơi xuất bản

Springer International Publishing

Hình thức xuất bản

Book

Open Access

All Open Access; Green Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus