CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Anti-intellectualism and education reform
Tác giả
Neem J.N.
Năm xuất bản
2020
Source title
Phi Delta Kappan
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.1177/0031721720917523
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
It is a strange and sobering experience to read Hofstadter in our own anti-intellectual era. If anything, left-leaning intellectuals’ sense of alienation has increased since the 1990s. To challenge anti-intellectualism in American education, the liberal arts and sciences will need to be restored to their central place in the curriculum. © 2020 by Phi Delta Kappa International.
Từ khóa
academic; anti-intellectualism; business; Common Core; curriculum; goals; Hofstadter; intellectual; liberal arts; liberal education; Mann; school; utilitarian
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cheney L., The end of history, Wall Street Journal, (1994); Coleman D., Middle school ELA curriculum video: Close reading of a text: ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail.’ Albany, (2012); Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, (2010); Cramer K., The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker, (2016); Fallace T., In the shadow of authoritarianism: American education in the twentieth century, (2018); Fitzpatrick K., Generous thinking: A radical approach to saving the university, (2019); Fraser J., Preparing America’ teachers: A history, (2007); Friedman T., How to get a job, New York Times, (2013); Gitlin T., Intellectuals and the flag, (2006); Gorski P., American covenant: A history of civil religion from the Puritans to the present, (2017); Haidt J., The age of outrage, City-Journal, (2017); Hartman A., A war for the soul of America: A history of the culture wars, (2015); Hirsch E.D., Why knowledge matters: Rescuing our children from failed educational theories, (2016); Hofstadter R., Anti-intellectualism in American life, (1963); Hofstadter R., The paranoid style and other essays, (1967); Joyce B., The first U.S. history textbooks: Constructing and disseminating the American tale in the nineteenth century, (2015); Labaree D., The trouble with ed schools, (2004); Lepore J., These truths: A history of the United States, (2018); Lepore J., This America: The case for the nation, (2019); Mann H., Twelfth annual report, Life and Works of Horace Mann, 4, (1848); Muller J., The tryanny of metrics, (2018); Nash G., Crabtree C.A., Dunn R.E., History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past, (1997); National standards for United States history, (1994); Raising standards for American education. A report to Congress, the Secretary of Education, the National Education Goals Panel, and the American people, (1992); Neem J., The Common Core and democratic education, The Hedgehog Review, pp. 102-110, (2015); Neem J., Democracy’s schools: The rise of public education in America, (2017); Nichols T., The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters, (2017); Ogren C., The American state normal school: An instrument of great good, (2005); Ravitch D., Left back: A century of failed school reforms, (2000); Ravitch D., The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education, (2010); Rorty R., The unpatriotic academy, New York Times, (1994); Sizer T., Secondary schools at the turn of the century, (1964); Strauss V., The quote that reveals how at least one corporate school reformer really views students, Washington Post, (2014); Tampio N., Learning versus the Common Core, (2019); Warner J., Why they can’t write: Killing the five-paragraph essay and other necessities, (2018); Wexler N., The knowledge gap: The hidden cause of America’s broken education system — and how to fix it, (2019); Zimmerman J., Whose America? Culture wars in the public schools, (2002)
Nơi xuất bản
SAGE Publications Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus