CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Kant, Hegel, and our fate as a zoôn politikon
Tác giả
Westphal K.R.
Năm xuất bản
2020
Source title
Hegel and Contemporary Practical Philosophy: Beyond Kantian Constructivism
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.4324/9781351205559-10
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Hume’s key insight is that, even if the most fundamental principles of justice are our artifacts, they are not arbitrary: they are necessary for human life on Earth, individually and collectively (§2). This is central to “Natural Law Constructivism, " a methodology which identifies and justifies basic, strictly objective moral norms, regardless of issues about moral (ir)realism or motivation. This is underscored by two key points of Hobbes’s state of nature (§3). Two points about social ontology made by Aristotle show why we are a zoôn politikon (§4). Kant argues anew that we as individual moral agents are fundamentally zoae politike (§§5, 6). These results highlight how the first two parts of Hegel’s Philosophical Outlines of Justice (1821, Rph) map directly onto Kant’s Doctrines of Justice and of Virtue (§7). Hegel’s account of Sittlichkeit undergirds Kant’s agreement with Aristotle by showing how the customs, economy, civil institutions, and law of a republican nation are artifacts produced by our free agency and activity. Fundamental to our human nature is this second moral, social and historical nature. These findings illuminate basic features of sound republican constitutionalism and liberal education (§8). © 2020 Taylor & Francis.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aristotle, Aristoteles [Operae] Graece, 3, (1831); Aristotle., The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2, (1995); Aristotle., Politics, (1998); Bacin S., The Perfect Duty to Oneself Merely as a Moral Being (TL 6:428-437), Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: AComprehensive Commentary, pp. 245-268, (2013); Bourgeois B., Hegel: Textes pédagogiques présentation et traduction, (1978); Broad C.D., Five Types of Ethical Theory, (1930); Buttner S., Hegels Bildungstheorie dargestellt anhand seiner Nürnberger Gymnasialreden nebst einer Reflexion auf die Situation der Bildung in der heutigen Weltgesellschaft, Bildung und Wissensgesellschaft (Heidelberger Jahrbücher 49), pp. 59-82, (2006); Curren R., Aristotle on the Necessity of Public Education, (2000); Curren R., Aristotle’s Educational Politics and the Aristotelian Renaissance in Philosophy of Education, Oxford Review of Education, 36, 5, pp. 543-559, (2010); Denis L., Virtue and its Ends (TL 6:394-398), Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: AComprehensive Commentary, pp. 159-181, (2013); Dorflinger B., Ethische Methodenlehre: Didaktik und Asketik (TL 6:477-485), Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: AComprehensive Commentary, pp. 383-410, (2013); Dum J., Guay R., Hegel and Honneth’s Theoretical Deficit: Education, Social Freedom and the Institutions of Modern Life, Hegel Bulletin, 38, 2, pp. 293-317, (2017); Ferguson A., An Essay on the History of Civil Society, (1767); Ferguson A., Versuch über die Geschichte der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, (1768); Frankena W., Three Historical Philosophies of Education: Aristotle, Kant, Dewey, (1965); Geismann G., Recht und Moral in der Philosophie Kants, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 14, pp. 3-124, (2006); Green T., Voices: The Educational Formation of Conscience, (1999); Greenberg K., Dratel J., The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib, (2005); Grossman L., Brownshirt Princess: AStudy of the “Nazi Conscience”, (2009); Harris H.S., Hegel’s Development, Towards the Sunlight, (1972); Harris H.S., Hegel’s Development, Night Thoughts: Jena 1801-1806, (1984); Harris H.S., Hegel’s Ladder, 2, (1997); Hegel G.W.F., Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse, (1821); Hegel G.W.F., Hegel’s Ansichten über Erziehung und Unterricht, 3, (1853); Hegel G.W.F., Werke in 20 Bänden, (1970); Hegel G.W.F., Gesammelte Werke, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, mit der Hegel-Kommission der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und dem Hegel-Archiv der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 21, (1986); Hegel G.W.F., Report on Teaching Philosophy at the Gymnasium, trans. S. Schütz, Miscellaneous Writings of G.W.F. Hegel, pp. 323-331, (2002); Hegel G.W.F., Hegels Werk im Kontext, (2006); Hegel G.W.F., Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825-26, 3, (2006); Herman B., Moral Literacy, (2007); Hume D., A Treatise of Human Nature, (1739); Jhering R., Law in Daily Life: Acollection of legal questions connected with the ordinary events of everyday life, (1904); Kant I., Kants Gesammelte Schriften, (1902); Kant I., Anthropologie “Dohna-Wundlacken, Graf zu” (1791/92), Die philosophischen Hauptvorlesungen Immanuel Kants, 25, (1924); Kant I., The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation, 16, (1995); Kant I., Practical Philosophy, (1996); Kant I., Kant im Kontext III: Kompleteausgabe, (2009); Kant I., Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, (2016); Koonz C., The Nazi Conscience, (2003); Lankford A., Promoting Aggression and Violence at Abu Ghraib: The U.S. Military’s Transformation of Ordinary People into Torturers, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 5, pp. 388-395, (2009); LeBar M., Slote M., Justice as a Virtue, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (2016); Ludwig B., Die Wiederentdeckung des Epikurischen Naturrechts: Zu Thomas Hobbes’ philosophischer Entwicklung von De Cive zum Leviathan im Pariser Exil 1640-1651, (1998); Ludwig B., Die Einteilungen de, Metaphysik der Sitten im Allgemeinen und die der Tugendlehre im Besonderen, pp. 59-84, (2013); Luqueer F.L., Hegel as Educator, (1896); Miles S., Abu Ghraib: Its Legacy for Military Medicine, The Lancet, 364, 9435, pp. 725-729, (2004); Mill J.S., Utilitarianism, 10, pp. 205-259, (1861); Mill J.S., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 33, (1963); Montesquieu C.S., Baron de, De l’esprit des lois, OEuvres complètes de Montesquieu, 5-6, (1748); O'Neill O., Constructivism in Rawls and Kant, The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, pp. 347-367, (2003); Plant R., Hegel and Political Economy, 2 parts, New Left Review, 103, (1977); Plato, Platonis opera quae extant omia, 3, (1578); Plato., The Laws, (1975); Plato., Complete Works, (1997); Reeve C.D.C., Introduction, Politics, (1998); Rosenkranz K., Die Pädagogik als System. Ein Grundriß, (1848); Rosenkranz K., Pedagogics as a System, (1872); Rosenkranz K., The Science of Education, (1878); Rosenkranz K., The Philosophy of Education, (1892); Rousseau J-J., Du Contrat Social, (1762); Rousseau J-J., Du contract social, Oeuvres completes, 3, pp. 347-470, (1976); Rousseau J-J., The Social Contract, in Social Contract, Discourse on the Virtue Most Necessary for a Hero, Political Fragments, and Geneva Manuscript, Collected Writings of Rousseau, 4, pp. 129-224, (1994); Sarracino C., Scott K.M., The Porning of America: The Rise of Porn Culture, What It Means, and Where We Go from Here, (2008); Schadow S., Recht und Ethik in Kants Metaphysic der Sitten, Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: AComprehensive Commentary, pp. 85-111, (2013); Sidgwick H., Practical Ethics: ACollection of Addresses and Essays, (1898); Sidgwick H., Miscellaneous Essays and Addresses, (1904); Stout L., Cultivating Conscience: How Good Laws make Good People, (2011); Timmermann J., Duties to Oneself as Such (TL 6:417-420), Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: AComprehensive Commentary, pp. 207-219, (2013); Trampota A., The Concept and Necessity of an End in Ethics, Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: AComprehensive Commentary, pp. 139-157, (2013); Westphal K.R., How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law: Justifying Strict Objectivity without Debating Moral Realism, (2016); Westphal K.R., Back to the 3 R’s: Rights, Responsibilities and Reasoning, SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy, 17, 1, pp. 21-60, (2016); Westphal K.R., Grounds of Pragmatic Realism: Hegel’s Internal Critique and Transformation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, (2018); Westphal K.R., Hegel’s Critique of Theoretical Spirit: Kant’s Functionalist Cognitive Psychology in Context, Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit: A Critical Guide, pp. 57-80, (2019); Westphal K.R., Hegel’s Civic Republicanism: Integrating Natural Law with Kant’s Moral Constructivism, (2020); Westphal K.R., Kant’s Analytic of Principles, Kant, pp. 254-273, (2020)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus