CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Epistemic Injustice and College in Prison: How Liberal Arts Education Strengthens Epistemic Agency

Tác giả

McGloin D.

Năm xuất bản

2022

Source title

Histories and Philosophies of Carceral Education: Aims, Contradictions, Promises and Problems

Số trích dẫn

0

DOI

10.1007/978-3-030-86830-7_9

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85153639654&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-86830-7_9&partnerID=40&md5=61ebbb9f3c766d9b550b9b5bd9b1b9cb

Tóm tắt

This chapter aims to draw a connection between epistemic injustice and higher education in prison (HEP), motivated by the corresponding beliefs that HEP is a concrete application of epistemic injustice and that the theoretical framework of epistemic injustice provides a powerful justification for HEP. More specifically, the ways in which philosophers describe the harms of epistemic injustice and how they may be counteracted correspond to some of the benefits of HEP as understood by practitioners and students. A close look at the work of the relevant philosophers, practitioners, and students reveals that they often discuss the same phenomena in different terms with different objectives. This chapter will demonstrate that epistemic injustice is common in prison settings and that HEP provides at least a partial antidote. In doing so, it will show that the benefits associated with counteracting epistemic injustice can aid HEP practitioners and students in validating HEP as a tool to help right a social wrong inflicted on incarcerated men and women. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Earhart J., Overcoming isolation: A college program challenges prison culture through engagement, Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 33, 2, pp. 329-341, (2014); Evans D., The elevating connection of higher education in prison: An incarcerated student’s perspective, Critical Education, 9, 11, pp. 1-13, (2018); Fricker M., Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing, (2007); Fricker M., Evolving concepts of epistemic injustice, The Routledge handbook of epistemic justice, pp. 53-60, (2017); An epistemology of incarceration: Constructing knowing on the inside, Philosophia, 6, 1, pp. 9-25, (2016); Heider C., Lehman K., Education and transformation: An argument for college in prison, Critical Education, 10, 9, pp. 1-13, (2019); Isaacson W., The code breaker: Jennifer Doudna, gene editing, and the future of the human race, (2021); Lewen J., Prison higher education and social transformation, Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 33, 2, pp. 353-361, (2014); McCorkel J., DeFina R., Beyond recidivism: The value of higher education in prison, Critical Studies, 10, 7, pp. 1-17, (2019); McHugh N., Epistemic communities and institutions, The Routledge handbook of epistemic justice, pp. 270-278, (2017); Medina J., Varieties of hermeneutical injustice, The Routledge handbook of epistemic justice, pp. 41-52, (2017); Medina J., Whitt M.S., Epistemic activism and the politics of cred-ibility: Testimonial injustice inside/outside a North Carolina jail, Making the case: Feminist and critical race philosophers engaging case studies, pp. 293-324, (2021); Mohanty C., Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity, (2003); Simpson L.C., Epistemic and political agency, The Routledge handbook of epistemic justice, pp. 254-260, (2017); Smith C., Complex sentences: Searching for the purpose of education inside a Massachusetts state prison, Harvard Education Review, 87, 1, pp. 81-98, (2017); Spivey-Jones R., An insider’s perspective, BPI blog, (2019)

Nơi xuất bản

Springer International Publishing

Hình thức xuất bản

Book chapter

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus