CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Choreographing decolonization: pedagogical confrontations at the intersection of traditional dance and liberal arts in higher education in India

Tác giả

Kaktikar A.

Năm xuất bản

2020

Source title

Research in Dance Education

Số trích dẫn

2

DOI

10.1080/14647893.2020.1764924

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085032556&doi=10.1080%2f14647893.2020.1764924&partnerID=40&md5=e2aca864a05aa6d1ca9f7f5fb8c7603c

Tóm tắt

When the traditional (dance) and the modern (university) intersect within the Liberal Arts, the pedagogical dynamics produced opens possible pathways to approach decolonization as an ongoing praxical pedagogical process. This un-archival unruly lived experience of decolonization proposes a possibility of evoking Indian pasts against the misuses of the present. Arguing for an un-archival response which mediates the insertion of traditional oral mnemocultres into academia, enables knowledge production through heterogeneous modes of practice sustained by an embodied relation with generativity. Examining the relationship between the curriculum, the teacher and the student created in this context, this paper theorizes decolonization as an epistemological move towards understanding, living and moving beyond the colonial translation. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Từ khóa

decolonization; India; Pedagogy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen H.M., Standardize, Classicize, and Nationalize, Performing Pasts: Reinventing the Arts in Modern South India, pp. 90-129, (2008); Banerji A., Nrityagram Tradition and Aesthetics of Transgression, How To Do Politics With Art, (2017); Chakravorty P., Dancing into Modernity: Multiple Narratives of India’s Kathak Dance, Dance Research Journal, 38, 1-2, pp. 115-136, (2006); Chatterjee P., The Partha Chatterjee Omnibus, (1999); Cherian A., Institutional Maneuvers, Nationalizing Performance, Delineating Genre: Reading the Sangeet Natak Akademi Reports 1953–1959, Third Frame: Literature, Culture and Society Vol. 2, No. 3, (2009); Clandinin D.J., Connelly F.M., Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research, (2000); Clandinin D.J., Narrative Inquiry: A Methodology for Studying Lived Experience, Research Studies in Music Education, 27, 1, pp. 44-54, (2006); Coorlawala U.A., The Sanskritized Body, Dance Research Journal, 36, 2, pp. 50-63, (2004); Cupples J., Coloniality Resurgent, Coloniality Interrupted, Unsettling Eurocentrism in the Westernized University, (2019); Dalidowicz M., Re-exporting Tradition: The Transcultural Practice of Kathak in Kolkata and the Creation of a New Female Body, Dance Matters: Performing India, (2010); Ellsworth E.A., Teaching Positions: Difference, Pedagogy, and the Power of Address, (1997); Foucault M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, (1979); Hooks B., Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, (1994); Kumar K., Political Agenda of Education: A Study of Colonialist and Nationalist Ideas, (2005); Meduri A., Bharatnatyam as a World Historical Form, Bharatnatyam: A Reader, (2010); Mohanty J.N., Indian Thought: Between Tradition and Modernity, Explorations in Philosophy: Essays by J. N. Mohanty, 1, (2001); Nair S., The Natyasastra and the Body in Performance: Essays on Indian Theories of Dance and Drama, (2015); (2013); Pagano M., Roselle L., Beyond Reflection through an Academic Lens: Refraction and International Experiential Education, The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad (Vol 18), pp. 217-229, (2009); Paranjape M.R., Debating the ‘Post’ Condition in India. Critical Vernaculars, Unauthorised Modernities, Post-Colonial Contentions, (2018); Pillai S., Rethinking Global Indian Dance through Local Eyes: The Contemporary Bharatanatyam Scene in Chennai, Dance Research Journal, 34, 2, pp. 14-29, (2002); Ram K., Dancing Off-Stage: Nationalism and Its Minor Practices in Tamil Nadu, Dance Matters, pp. 3-39, (2010); Rao D.V., Cultures of Memory in South Asia: Orality, Literacy and the Problem of Inheritance, (2014); Scott D., Hargreaves E., Handbook on Learning, (2014); (2017); Spivak G.C., The Post-Colonial Critic, (1990); Spivak G.C., Deconstruction and Cultural Studies: Arguments for a Deconstructive Cultural Studies, Deconstructions: A User’s Guide, pp. 15-16, (2000); Spivak G.C., An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization, (2013); Srinivasan A., Reform or Conformity?, Bharatnatyam: A Reader, (2010); Srivastava S., Constructing Post-Colonial India: National Character and the Doon School. Culture and Communication in Asia, (1998); Subramanian L., Embracing the Canonical: Identity, Tradition and Modernity in Karnatic Music, Performing Pasts: Reinventing the Arts in Modern South India, pp. 45-70, (2008); van der Veer P., The Modern Spirit of Asia: The Spiritual and the Secular in China and India, (2014); Vatsysyan K., Dance Scholarship and Its Future: Indian Context, Traversing Tradition, pp. 1-21, (2011); (2017); ‘What We Know Is Built on Erasure’ the Contemporary Journal on Translations, (2018); Weidman A.J., Singing the Classical, Voicing the Modern: The Postcolonial Politics of Music in South India, (2006); Zakaria F., Defense of a Liberal Education, (2015)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus