CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Liberal education in turbulent times: Policy, pedagogy and their effects in European comparison
Tác giả
Kelly P.
Năm xuất bản
2020
Source title
London Review of Education
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.18546/LRE.18.1.03
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Europe has seen a national populist turn in recent years, a movement away from liberal elites and the rise of ‘post-truth’ politics. While populist parties may have passed the high point of their success, their politics has had a considerable impact on the mainstream, drawing traditional parties in populist directions. In this article, I consider the consequences of this for those of a liberal persuasion, who value openness and diversity and who are suspicious of those bringing simple solutions to complex problems. I reflect on the findings of a series of comparative education policy and pedagogy studies that I have conducted with colleagues in northern Europe over the past ten years, and in their light, make a number of suggestions for how education can defend liberalism while taking the concerns of national populists seriously. © 2020, UCL IOE Press. All rights reserved.
Từ khóa
Democratic governance; Educational purpose; Methodological pluralism; Neo-liberal education reform; Populism and education; Sceptical liberalism
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexiadou N., Policy learning and Europeanisation in education: The governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge, Transnational Policy Flows in European Education: The Making and Governing of Knowledge in The Educational Policy Field, pp. 123-140, (2014); Andreasen K., Kelly P., Kousholt K., McNess E., Ydesen C., Standardised testing in compulsory schooling in England and Denmark: A comparative study and analysis, Bildung Und Erziehung, 68, 3, pp. 329-348, (2015); Au W.W., Devising inequality: A Bernsteinian analysis of high?stakes testing and social reproduction in education, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29, 6, pp. 639-651, (2008); Ball S.J., The Education Debate, (2013); Ball S.J., Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers, Journal of Education Policy, 30, 3, pp. 299-301, (2015); Ball S.J., Bowe R., Subject departments and the “implementation” of national curriculum policy: An overview of the issues, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 2, pp. 97-115, (1992); Ball S.J., Maguire M., Braun A., How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools, (2012); Bauman Z., Liquid Modernity, (2000); Berlin I., Two concepts of liberty, Berlin, 1, pp. 118-172, (1969); Berlin I., Russian Thinkers, (1978); Berlin I., The Pursuit of the ideal’. in Berlin, I. the Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas, pp. 1-20, (2013); Bernstein B., Class, Codes and Control, 4, (1990); Bernstein B., Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique, (1996); Bernstein B., Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 2, pp. 157-173, (1999); Biesta G.J.J., Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research, Educational Theory, 57, 1, pp. 1-22, (2007); Biesta G.J.J., What is education for, Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy, pp. 10-27, (2010); Biesta G.J.J., Why “what works” still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 5, pp. 491-503, (2010); Bourdieu P., On the State: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1989–1992, (2014); Davis E., Post-Truth: Why We have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do about It, (2017); Eatwell R., Goodwin M., National Populism: The Revolt against Liberal Democracy, (2018); El Bouhali C., The OECD neoliberal governance: Policies of international testing and their impact on global education systems, Decolonizing Global Citizenship Education, pp. 119-129, (2015); Ertl H., Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany, Oxford Review of Education, 32, 5, pp. 619-634, (2006); Fuller S., Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game, (2018); Giddens A., The Consequences of Modernity, (1990); Giddens A., Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, (1991); Gray J., Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age, (1995); Gray J., Isaiah Berlin: An Interpretation of His Thought, (1996); Gray J., Two Faces of Liberalism, (2002); Green A., Education and State Formation: Europe, East Asia and the USA, (2013); Harvey D., Neoliberalism as creative destruction, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610, pp. 22-44, (2007); Hermann S., Magt Og Oplysning: Folkeskolen 1950–2006, (2007); Hirsch E.D., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, (1987); Testing and Assessment: Third Report of Session 2007–08, 1, (2008); Kelly A., Introduction, pp. xxiii-xxxv, (1978); Kelly P., Standardized assessment and the shaping of neoliberal student subjectivities, Testing and Inclusive Schooling: International Challenges and Opportunities, pp. 64-78, (2018); Kelly P., Dorf H., Pratt N., Hohmann U., Comparing teacher roles in Denmark and England, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44, 4, pp. 566-586, (2014); Kelly P., Egedal Andreasen K., Kousholt K., McNess E., Ydesen C., Education governance and standardised tests in Denmark and England, Journal of Education Policy, 33, 6, pp. 739-758, (2018); Kelly P., Hohmann U., Pratt N., Dorf H., Teachers as mediators: An exploration of situated English teaching, British Educational Research Journal, 39, 4, pp. 609-634, (2013); Kelly P., Kotthoff H.-G., Comparing episodes of mathematics teaching for higher achievers in England and Germany, Research in Comparative and International Education, 11, 4, pp. 394-405, (2016); Kelly P., Kotthoff H.-G., PISA, national and regional education policies and their effect on mathematics teaching in England and Germany, Research in Comparative and International Education, 12, 3, pp. 318-332, (2017); Kelly P., Pratt N., Dorf H., Hohmann U., Comparing pedagogy in mathematics in Denmark and England, European Educational Research Journal, 12, 4, pp. 553-567, (2013); Lingard B., Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research, Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 4, pp. 355-382, (2011); Lingard B., Martino W., Rezai-Rashti G., Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments, Journal of Education Policy, 28, 5, pp. 539-556, (2013); Marx K., Economic and philosophic manuscripts, Marx, K. Early Writings, pp. 279-400, (1975); Mundy K., Green A., Lingard B., Verger A., The Handbook of Global Education Policy, (2016); Nordin A., Sundberg D., Transnational Policy Flows in European Education: The Making and Governing of Knowledge in The Education Policy Field, (2014); Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA, (2001); Ozga J., Governing knowledge: Research steering and research quality, European Educational Research Journal, 7, 3, pp. 261-272, (2008); Sellar S., Lingard B., The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education, British Educational Research Journal, 40, 6, pp. 917-936, (2014); Sennett R., The Craftsman, (2009); Stevenson H., Wood P., Markets, managerialism and teachers’ work: The invisible hand of high stakes testing in England’, International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12, 2, pp. 42-61, (2013); Waldow F., What PISA did and did not do: Germany after the “PISA-shock, European Educational Research Journal, 8, 3, pp. 476-483, (2009); Whitty G., Furlong J., Knowledge and the Study of Education: An International Exploration, (2017); Young M.F.D., Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education, (2008)
Nơi xuất bản
UCL IOE Press
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus