CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

The Closing of Academic Departments and Programs: A Core and Periphery Approach to the Liberal Arts and Practical Arts

Tác giả

Osley-Thomas R.

Năm xuất bản

2020

Source title

Minerva

Số trích dẫn

6

DOI

10.1007/s11024-019-09389-y

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074573710&doi=10.1007%2fs11024-019-09389-y&partnerID=40&md5=9efe2d5f289aaae809d635300107bf42

Tóm tắt

Did the liberal art disciplines at American universities have the highest failure rate between the 1970s and the early 2000s? Important theoretical traditions indeed believe that the liberal arts are the most threatened disciplines in the academy, while other theories have differing views. This paper reexamines the vulnerability of academic disciplines by assessing new data. It focuses on the closing of academic departments and programs, and it uses event history analysis to show that practical arts departments and programs failed at a much higher rate than liberal arts departments and programs. In doing so, this paper raises important questions about how American universities are changing during a time of budget cuts and retrenchment. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.

Từ khóa

Academic capitalism; Academic departments; Academic programs; University organization; University status

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bastedo M.N., Gumport P.J., Access to What? Mission Differentiation and Academic Stratification in U.S. Public Higher Education, Higher Education, 46, pp. 341-359, (2003); Bok D., Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should be Learning More, (2007); Brint S., Et al., Who are the early adopters of new academic fields? Comparing four perspectives on the institutionalization of degree granting programs in US four-year colleges and Universities, 1970–2005, Higher Education, 61, 5, pp. 563-585, (2011); Brint S., Riddle M., Turk-Bicakci L., Levy C.S., From the Liberal to the Practical Arts in American Colleges and Universities: Organizational Analysis and Curricular Change, The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 2, pp. 151-180, (2005); Brint S., Mulligan K., Rotondi M.B., Apkarian J., The College Catalog Study Database, 1975–2010, (2011); Brint S., Mulligan K., Rotondi M.B., Apkarian J., The Institutional Data Archive on American Higher Education, 1970–2010, (2011); Brint S., Karabel J., The Diverted Dream: Community Colleges and the Promise of Educational Opportunity in America, 1900–1985, (1991); Brint S., Proctor K., Mulligan K., Rotondi M.B., Hanneman R.A., Declining Academic Fields in U.S. Four-Year Colleges and Universities, 1970–2006, The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 4, pp. 582-613, (2012); Brint S., Proctor K., Murphy S.P., Hanneman R.A., The Market Model and the Growth and Decline of Academic Fields in U.S. Colleges and Universities, 1980-2000, Sociological Forum, 27, 2, pp. 275-299, (2012); Cameron K.S., Organizational adaptation and higher education, The Journal of Higher Education, 55, 2, pp. 122-144, (1984); Carlson S., Colleges ‘Unleash the Deans’ With Decentralized Budgets, Chronicle of Higher Education., (2015); Carroll G.R., Swaminathan A., Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing Industry, American Journal of Sociology, 106, pp. 715-762, (2000); Colyvas J.A., Jonsson S., Ubiquity and legitimacy: Disentangling diffusion and institutionalization, Sociological Theory, 29, 2, pp. 27-53, (2011); Davis G.F., Powell W.W., Organization-environment relations, Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Consulting Psychol, pp. 315-375, (1992); DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W., The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147-160, (1983); D'Aunno T., Succi M., Alexander J.A., The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, pp. 679-703, (2000); Eckel P.D., Decision rules used in academic program closure: Where the rubber meets the road, The Journal of Higher Education, 73, pp. 237-258, (2002); Eckel P.D., Changing course: Making the hard decisions to eliminate academic programs, (2003); Engell J., Dangerfield A., The Market-Model University: Humanities in the Age of Money, Harvard Magazine, 111, pp. 48-55, (1998); Finkelstein M.J., Farrar D., Pfnister A.O., The adaptation of liberal arts colleges to the 1970’s: An analysis of critical events, Journal of Higher Education, 55, 3, pp. 242-268, (1984); Foderaro L., Budget-Cutting Colleges Bid Some Languages Adie., (2010); Frank D.J., Gabler J., Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Shifts in Academia in the 20th Century, (2006); Frank D.J., Schofer E., Torres J.C., Rethinking History: Change in the University Curriculum, 1910–1990, Sociology of Education, 67, pp. 231-242, (1994); Gabler J., Frank D.J., The Natural Sciences in the University: Change and Variation over the 20th Century, Sociology of Education, 78, pp. 183-206, (2005); Gates G.S., Isomorphism, Homogeneity, and Rationalism in University Retrenchment, The Review of Higher Education, 20, pp. 253-275, (1997); Geiger R., Knowledge and Money: Research Universities and the Paradox of the Marketplace, (2004); Gumport P.J., The Contested Terrain of Academic Program Reduction, The Journal of Higher Education, 64, pp. 283-311, (1993); Gumport P.J., Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives, Higher Education, 39, pp. 67-91, (2000); Gumport P.J., Snydman S.K., The formal organization of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure, Journal of Higher Education, 73, pp. 375-408, (2002); Hackett E., Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science, Journal of Higher Education, 61, 3, pp. 241-279, (1990); Hannan M.T., Freeman J.H., The population ecology of organizations, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp. 929-964, (1977); Hannan M.T., Freeman J.H., Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American Sociological Review, 49, pp. 149-164, (1984); Hannan M.T., Freeman J., Organizational Ecology, (1989); Haveman H.A., David R.J., Ecologists and institutionalists: Friends or foes?, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 573-595, (2008); Hearn J.C., Belasco A.S., Commitment to the Core: A Longitudinal Analysis of Humanities Degree Production in Four-Year Colleges, The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 3, pp. 387-416, (2015); Herzog K., UW-Stevens Point rolls out Transformation that would cut 6 Liberal Arts Degrees, Focus on Careers, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel November, 12, (2018); Jaquette O., In Pursuit of Revenue and Prestige: The Adoption and Production of master’s Degrees by U.S. Colleges and Universities., (2011); Jaquette O., Ednaparra E., Using IPEDS for panel analyses: Core concepts, data challenges, and empirical applications, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 467-533, (2014); Jaschik S., Disappearing Languages at Albany, Inside Higher Ed October, 4, (2010); Kirp D.L., Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education, (2003); Kleinman D.L., Osley-Thomas R., Uneven Commercialization: Contradiction and Conflict in the Identity and Practices of American Universities, Minerva, 52, 1, pp. 1-26, (2014); Kraatz M., Learning By Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change, Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 621-643, (1998); Kraatz M.S., Zajac E.J., Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change, American Sociological Review, 61, 5, pp. 812-836, (1996); Morphew C.C., The Realities of Strategic Planning: Program Termination at East Central University, The Review of Higher Education, 23, 3, pp. 257-280, (2000); Olzak S., Kangas N., Organizational Innovation: Establishing Racial, Ethnic, and Women’s Studies Programs in the U.S, Sociology of Education, 8, pp. 163-188, (2008); Powell W.W., Owen-Smith J., The New World of Knowledge Production in the Life Sciences, The Future of the City of the Intellect: The Changing American University, pp. 107-130, (2002); Price M., Johns Hopkins Graduate Science Writing Program to Close, Science May, 1, (2013); Rawlings C., Between Strategy and Conformity: A Status-Based Explanation Of Academic Program Differentiation, (2012); Rawlings C., Becoming What You Are: Reproducing Status Orders In Uncertain Environments, American Sociological Association, Organizations Section Panel, (2013); Readings B., The University in Ruins, (1996); Reich E.S., Texas Holds Firm on Physics Closures: Undergraduate Programmes Face Termination Unless Graduation Rates Improve, Nature, (2011); Rogers M., Battle Over Budget Cuts, Inside Higher Ed November, 20, (2013); Sharma P., Hoy F., Astrachan J.H., Koiranen M., The Practice Driven Evolution of Family Business Education, Journal of Business Research, 60, pp. 1012-1021, (2007); Singerwillett J.D.J.B., Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence, (2003); Slaughter S., Retrenchment in the 1980s: the politics of prestige and gender, Journal of Higher Education, 64, 3, pp. 250-282, (1993); Slaughter S., Federal Policy and Supply-Side Institutional Resource Allocation at Public Research Universities, Review of Higher Education, 21, 3, pp. 209-244, (1998); Slaughter S., Leslie L., Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policy, and the Entrepreneurial University, (1997); Summers D., Prospects for the Humanities as Public Research Universities Privatize their Finances, Tracking Changes in the Humanities: Essays on Finance and Education, pp. 47-78, (2005); Taylor B.J., Cantwell B., Slaughter S., Quasi-Markets in US Higher Education: The Humanities and Institutional Revenues, The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 5, pp. 675-707, (2013); Thompson J.D., Organizations in Action, (1967); Tolbert P.S., Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, pp. 1-13, (1985); Volk C., Slaughter S., Thomas S., Models of Institutional Resource Allocation: Mission, Market, and Gender, Journal of Higher Education, 72, 4, pp. 387-413, (2001)

Nơi xuất bản

Springer

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus