Staging transformative learning across collegiate language curricula: Student perceptions of structured reflection for language learning
Crane C.; Sosulski M.J.
2020
Foreign Language Annals
3
10.1111/flan.12437
Building on recent efforts to bridge transformative learning and world language education (Clifford & Reisinger, 2019; Johnson, 2015; Randolph & Johnson, 2017), this article explores how perspective-shifting can be fostered among L2 learners through critical reflection tasks staged across collegiate language curricula. A range of reflection tasks designed to decenter the self from existing assumptions, beliefs, and values as learners try on and respond to cultural perspectives different from their own is presented, focusing on the developmental needs of learners at different instructional levels. The study investigates how beginning to advanced collegiate L2 learners perceive working with structured reflection (SR) tasks across two German programs in the United States (an R1 state university and a private liberal arts college). Analysis of student surveys (n = 237) shows that L2 learners largely valued doing reflective work and that some learners found SR helped them to think about and evaluate their learning and facilitate perspective-shifting. © 2020 American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
critical and higher-level thinking; curriculum development; intercultural awareness and competence; post-secondary; value of language learning
Allwright D., Hanks J., The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice, (2009); Anderson C.S., Cunningham K., Culture, religion, and nationality: Developing ethnographic skills and reflective practices connected to study abroad, Integrating study abroad into the curriculum: Theory and practice across the disciplines, pp. 63-84, (2010); Baumgartner L.M., Mezirow's theory of transformative learning from 1975 to present, The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice, pp. 99-115, (2012); Bennett M.J., Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity, Education for the intercultural experience, pp. 109-135, (1993); Berger J.G., Dancing on the threshold of meaning: Recognizing and understanding the growing edge, Journal of Transformative Education, 2, pp. 336-351, (2004); Bettencourt M., Supporting student learning outcomes through service learning, Foreign Language Annals, 48, 3, pp. 473-490, (2015); Braun V., Clarke V., Successful qualitative research. A practical guide for beginners, (2013); Brookfield S., Teaching for critical thinking. Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions, (2012); Byram M., Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence, (1997); Byram M., Wagner M., Making a difference: Language teaching for intercultural and international dialogue, Foreign Language Annals, 51, 1, pp. 140-151, (2018); Clifford J., Reisinger D.S., Community-based language learning. A framework for educators, (2019); Correia M.G., Bleicher R.E., Making connections to teach reflection, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14, 2, pp. 41-49, (2008); Crane C., Fingerhuth M., Huenlich D., “What makes this so complicated?” On the value of disorienting dilemmas in language instruction, Engaging the world: Social pedagogies and language learning, pp. 227-252, (2018); Crane C., Making connections in beginning language instruction: Structured reflection and the World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages, The interconnected language curriculum: Critical transitions and interfaces in articulated K-16 contexts, pp. 51-74, (2018); Crane C., Sosulski M.J.; Cranton P., Understanding and promoting transformative learning. A guide to theory and practice, (2016); Cranton P., Hoggan C., Evaluating transformative learning, The handbook of transformative learning, pp. 520-535, (2012); Cunningham K., Putting the anthropological toolkit to use in international and intercultural learning, Practicing Anthropology, 32, 3, pp. 23-26, (2010); Deardorff D.K., Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization, Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, pp. 241-266, (2006); Durocher D.O., Teaching sensitivity to cultural difference in the first-year foreign language classroom, Foreign Language Annals, 40, 1, pp. 143-160, (2007); Eyler J., Giles D.E., Where's the learning in service-learning?, (1999); Foster E., Transformative learning in adult second language learning, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, pp. 33-40, (1997); Goulah J., Village voices, global visions: Digital video as a transformative foreign language learning tool, Foreign Language Annals, 40, 1, pp. 62-78, (2007); Grabove V., The many facets of transformative learning theory and practice, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, pp. 89-96, (1997); Grossman R., Structures for facilitating student reflection, College Teaching, 57, 1, pp. 15-22, (2009); Hall E.T., Beyond culture, (1976); Hasan R., Literacy, everyday talk and society, Literacy in society, pp. 377-424, (1996); Hatcher J.A., Bringle R.G., Reflection. Bridging the gap between service and learning, College Teaching, 45, 4, pp. 153-158, (1997); Ivers J.J., Metacognition and foreign language cultural instruction, Journal of Transformative Education, 5, 2, pp. 152-162, (2007); Johnson S.M., Adult learning in the language classroom, (2015); Johnson S.M., Mullins Nelson B., Above and beyond the syllabus: Transformation in an adult, foreign language classroom, Language Awareness, 19, 1, pp. 35-50, (2010); Kearney E., Intercultural learning in modern language education: Expanding meaning-making potentials, (2015); Kern R., Literacy and language teaching, (2000); Kiely R., A transformative learning model for service-learning: A longitudinal case study, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12, 1, pp. 5-22, (2005); King K.P., Examining learning activities and transformative learning, International Journal of University Adult Education, 36, 3, pp. 23-37, (1997); King K.P., A guide to perspective transformation and learning activities: The Learning Activities Survey, (1998); King K.P., The adult ESL experience: Facilitating perspective transformation in the classroom, Adult Basic Education, 10, 2, pp. 69-89, (2000); Kramsch C., The multilingual subject, (2009); Liddicoat A.J., Scarino A., Intercultural language teaching and learning, (2013); Mezirow J., Transformative dimensions of adult learning, (1991); Mezirow J., Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory, The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice, pp. 73-95, (2012); Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world, Profession, 2007, pp. 234-245, (2007); Moeller A.J., Osborn S.R.F., A pragmatist perspective on building intercultural communicative competency: From theory to classroom practice, Foreign Language Annals, 47, 4, pp. 669-683, (2014); World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages, (2015); Randolph L.J., Johnson S.M., Social justice in the language classroom: A call to action, Dimension, 2017, pp. 99-121, (2017); Rogers R.R., Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis, Innovative Higher Education, 26, 1, pp. 37-57, (2001); Snyder C., Grabbing hold of a moving target: Identifying and measuring the transformative learning process, Journal of Transformative Education, 6, pp. 159-181, (2008); Sosulski M.J., From Broadway to Berlin: Transformative learning through German hip-hop, Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 46, 1, pp. 91-105, (2013); Taylor E.W., Fostering transformative learning, Transformative learning in practice. Insights from community, workplace, and higher education, pp. 3-17, (2009); Taylor K., Elias D., Transformative learning. A developmental perspective, The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice, pp. 147-161, (2012)
Wiley-Blackwell
Article
Scopus